If he has serious electability problems why do you GOPers feel it necessary to insult and denigrate Trump and his supporters. Isn't that a waste of time and resources? Why not provide positive policies and accomplish ments of those you support?
Because right now there is a serious risk that y'all are going to saddle us with this unelectable chump. And just because you don't like them doesn't make the facts insulting or denigrating. Finally, once upon a time, and from time to time, we do try to explain why the more adult of the candidates is preferable, but (a) you always shout us down with cries of GOPe and GOProg, and (b) we acknowledge that the others have flaws, which makes it hard to discuss anything with true believers who's founding tenets include the belief in the infallibility of their hero.
Immigration is a complicated issue, with solutions that are not eminently ideologically satisfactory, but any time someone tries to have an adult conversation about it, we get shouted down with cries of "amnesty" "doesn't know what illegal means" and other inanities. And all you and your hero can come up with are stupefyingly simple solutions that epitomize H.L. Mencken's aphorism that "for every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."
Islamic terrorism and the syrian refugee crisis are other problems that are individually complicated and together even more complicated because intertwined. But again, all you and your hero can come up with are stupefyingly simple, and wrong, solutions. Not all muslims hate America or Americans, certainly not the vast majority who are themselves Americans; so only a stupefying simpleton would claim that all muslims hate America, or propose as a solution that all muslims be rounded up and registered, like so many dogs with licenses. And then we get Fishrrman, with his pix of Jews being loaded onto cattle cars by the Nazis, and his exhortation to "do it right this time." That goes beyond simply being clear, simple, and wrong. It's also immoral.
