0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
"Stalking" may be too strong. Sorry.But, all I'm seeing is you calling him "Hillary" in multiple one-liners on assorted threads.You need some better material. And we have an unwritten rule here about "playing the ball..and not the man". It works.I'm simply speaking as a member here, btw.
Stalking? Really? Is disagreeing with one who uses ad hominem attacks stalking? Must be a new definition. Sink's first impression certainly has counted.
'At a CPAC speech in 1977, Reagan talked about broadening the party: “If we are to attract more working men and women of this country, we will do so not by simply ‘making room’ for them, but by making certain they have a say in what goes on in the party.” '
Thanks, apology accepted.I guess Sinkspur isn't aware of the unwritten rule.
When it goes from thread to thread, using the same words and form each time, yes.
Yes, the way he changes epithets from post-to post is simply inspiring. Study, Grasshopper, at the feet of the master.
So it's acceptable if the poster changes the words like some here? I can do that.
You do have a certain flair for it. You're still #1 on my list!
And you have a flair for prescience. How did you know what I was going to say?
I was wondering about that too. Did you delete and repost?
The rules do not apply to sinkspur, who is in a protected category.
No, I only thought about doing it...