0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Me? Because to call them puppets is to trivialize the evil they did of their own free will.
What would you do if it would not trivialize a lesser evil to consider a greater evil?
What?
But, it's not an"either or". Both conditions can be true. And probably are in this case.
Exactly, and based on what I can tell, both conditions generally are true. A puppet can be a powerful person and still be managed by a higher money-power.I usually just assume that is the case because it always has been as far as I can tell...
If he was used to smuggle Romanov wealth, he was doing it for someone else. Else he would have kept that wealth himself. Puppet? Yes...