Author Topic: Navy Releases Timeline of Iran’s Capture of U.S. Sailors  (Read 835 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline truth_seeker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,386
  • Gender: Male
  • Common Sense Results Oriented Conservative Veteran
Navy Releases Timeline of Iran’s Capture of U.S. Sailors
« on: January 18, 2016, 09:56:38 pm »
Navy Releases Timeline of Iran’s Capture of U.S. Sailors

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/19/us/politics/navy-releases-timeline-of-irans-capture-of-us-sailors.html?_r=0

By MICHAEL S. SCHMIDTJAN. 18, 2016

In an effort to defuse the controversy over the brief capture of 10 Navy sailors last week, the Defense Department on Monday released a timeline of events surrounding the seizure, but the account was spare on new details and left several fundamental questions unanswered.

The timeline did not explain why the crews of two patrol boats — which the military said were supposed to remain in international waterways — deviated from their course and strayed into Iranian territorial waters. Nor did it explain why they allowed Iranian sailors to board their boats, or why the boats’ communications equipment apparently failed, cutting them off from their superiors.

Senior Pentagon officials said the timeline contained limited new information because the Navy was reviewing the actions of the sailors, who could face stiff judicial and administrative punishment for the episode. The Navy does not want to prejudice the outcome of that inquiry by offering too many details, the officials said.

The capture was highly embarrassing for the Navy. It came just hours before President Obama’s last State of the Union address and while American and Iranian diplomats were in the final stages of negotiating a prisoner swap. The Iranian government was also taking its last measures to comply with the nuclear deal, which allowed economic sanctions against the country to be lifted on Saturday.

The information released on Monday gave a few specific times that had not previously been made public. But it did not go much beyond the general narrative that emerged last week — which was based largely on statements from Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter — that the crews were not on a clandestine mission and had “misnavigated” when they came within a few miles of Farsi Island, where Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps has a naval base in the middle of the Persian Gulf.

The timeline said that last Tuesday, the crews were taking two riverine command boats, which are typically used to patrol shallow waterways, from Kuwait to Bahrain. The boats departed Kuwait at 12:23 p.m. local time and were supposed to refuel from a Coast Guard cutter in the Persian Gulf at 5 p.m.

“The planned transit path for the mission was down the middle of the gulf and not through the territorial waters of any country other than Kuwait and Bahrain,” according to the timeline released by the United States Central Command, which oversees all American military operations in the Middle East.

Around 5:10 p.m., the Navy received a report that the boats “were being queried by Iranians.” At 5:29 p.m., the Navy “was advised of degraded communications” with the boats. And then at 5:45 p.m., the Navy “was notified of a total loss of communications with” the craft, prompting a search-and-rescue operation.

The Navy tried to contact Iranian military units near Farsi Island “by broadcasting information regarding their search-and-rescue effort over marine radio,” according to the timeline. “Officials also separately notified Iranian coast guard units by phone about the search for their personnel.”

A little less than four hours after the sailors were taken, a Navy cruiser “received a communication from the Iranians” that they were in Iranian custody “and were safe and healthy.”

“Initial operational reports showed that while in transit from Kuwait to Bahrain the RCBS deviated from their planned course on their way to the refueling,” the timeline said, using the acronym for the riverine command boats. “The command investigation will determine what caused the change in course and why the RCBS entered into Iranian territorial waters in the vicinity of Farsi Island.”

According to the timeline, one of the boats had a mechanical issue with its diesel engine that caused both boats to stop to “begin troubleshooting.”

The boats had stopped in Iranian territorial waters, “although it’s not clear the crew was aware of their exact location,” the timeline said.

While the crew members were investigating the mechanical issue, two small Iranian boats with armed personnel approached, the timeline said. “Soon after, two more Iranian military vessels arrived on scene also with armed personnel on board.”

The Iranian and American sailors had a verbal exchange, but there was no gunfire, the military said. Then, armed Iranian military personnel boarded the boats “while other Iranian personnel aboard the Iranian vessels conducted armed over-watch of the boats with mounted machine guns.”

The boats were escorted at gunpoint to Farsi Island, where the American sailors disembarked and were detained for about 15 hours, the timeline said.

There is no indication the sailors were physically harmed.

“The Navy command investigation will focus on the sailors’ treatment while in Iranian custody, including any interrogation by Iranian personnel,” Central Command said.

At 11:43 a.m. on Wednesday, the sailors were released. Other sailors were brought in to take over the boats, which continued on to Bahrain; the crews members who had been taken captive were flown to land by Navy aircraft.

An inventory of the boats found that the Iranians had not taken any weapons, ammunition or communications gear. But two SIM cards, which can store data, from hand-held satellite phones were missing.

“The sailors are in good health and continue to go through the reintegration process,” the military said. “The Navy command investigation continues, and more details will be provided when it is completed.”
"God must love the common man, he made so many of them.�  Abe Lincoln

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Re: Navy Releases Timeline of Iran’s Capture of U.S. Sailors
« Reply #1 on: January 18, 2016, 10:22:06 pm »
CENTRAL VIEW for Monday, January 18, 2016

by William Hamilton, J.D., Ph.D.
Iranian coup: A tale of two U.S. Navy vessels

Last week, the U.S. Navy dispatched two of its fearsomely armed Riverine Command Boats (RCBs) to patrol between Kuwait and Bahrain. Somehow, the RCBs were seized by the Iranian Navy; the crewmembers arrested, and -- even though the U.S. and Iran are not technically at war -- treated as Prisoners of War (POWs). How could this happen?

The Swedish-designed, U.S.- manufactured RCBs cost $2.8 million per copy. Each RCB carries six machine guns, to include a .50 caliber Gatling gun, plus grenade launchers. Covered with armor plating able to deflect AK-47 fire, the RCB’s 49.4 mile-per-hour top speed means RCBs can outrun every known surface warship.

To guard against surprise attack, RCBs carry the Sea FLIR III infrared sensor system, thermal imaging, a laser rangefinder, and long-range radar. Navigation is by a top-of-the line GPS and chart plotter system, along with traditional chart and compass back-up. The RCB’s world-wide communications gear nets with ships, aircraft, and ground forces.

Operating in pairs, the RCBs provide each other with mutual fire support. If one RCB is disabled, the other RCB can tow it to safety. Thus, the question arises: How could two RCBs lose their ability to navigate at the same time and stray into Iranian waters? And how could two world-class weapons platforms be seized by the, arguably, inferior Iranian Navy?

Apparently, one of the RCBs had a propulsion problem and radioed U.S. 5th Fleet in Bahrain for assistance. Congressman Louis Gohmert (R) of Texas claims the Obama White House intervened, asked the Iranian Navy to provide assistance, and ordered the U.S. 5th Fleet to stand down.

By long-standing naval custom, disabled boats found in territorial waters are rendered assistance, and simply escorted back into international waters. Their crews are not subjected to POW treatment or put on world-wide video display, looking like criminals.

But, instead of being treated as distressed vessels exercising the mariners’ right of innocent passage, the Iranians arrested the crew members, treated them as POWs, and, somehow, got the officer-in-charge to make filmed statements praising the Iranians and saying the treatment the crew received was: "Fantastic."

Absent Congressman Gohmert’s explanation -- citing White House intervention -- it appears Articles II and V of the U.S. military’s Code of Conduct were violated. Article II states: "I will never surrender of my own free will. If in command, I will never surrender the members of my command while they still have the means to resist." Article V reads: "When questioned, should I become a prisoner of war, I am required to give name, rank, service number, and date of birth. I will evade answering further questions to the best of my ability. I will make no oral or written statements disloyal to my country and its allies or harmful to their cause."

Alternatively, could it be that the White House-imposed Rules of Engagement (ROE) robbed the RCBs of their "means to resist"? Were the RCB’s awesome weapons even permitted to be loaded? Congress should demand to see the Operations Order under which the two RCBs left Kuwait for Bahrain and demand copies of all the communications between the RCBs, U.S. 5th Fleet, and the White House. Meanwhile, the RCB crews are left twisting in the wind.

Nationally syndicated columnist, William Hamilton, is a laureate of the Oklahoma Journalism Hall of Fame, the Colorado Aviation Hall of Fame, the Oklahoma University Army ROTC Wall of Fame, and is a recipient of the University of Nebraska 2015 Alumni Achievement Award. He was educated at the University of Oklahoma, the George Washington University, the Infantry School, the U.S Naval War College, the University of Nebraska, and Harvard University.

http://www.central-view.com/default.asp
« Last Edit: January 18, 2016, 10:22:40 pm by rangerrebew »