Not me. And Rubio can beat Hillary. Trump.............. not a chance.
Rubio would be a smart choice. But still, in the way that things used to be done, Rubio would be vying for the Veep slot, not the Big Job. But that's before the recent fad of electing first term Senators to the Presidency and watching the whole shebang go to hell.
That's, really, my big issue with Cruz - when all is said done, does he have the seasoning, the stature and the leadership credentials? Haven't we learned that the Presidency can't be the amateur hour?
Remember when the deep bench of dynamic GOP governors, steeped in executive experience, was touted as our strength? Walker and Jindal and Pataki crapped out, and Christie, Kasich and Bush are just hanging on. (Actually, they are cannibalizing each other's support. If the RNC were as sinister and smart as some folks pronounce they are, they'd get those three in a room, knock their heads together, and decide which one of the three will proceed forward with the support of the others. Then a traditionally-qualified candidate can perhaps emerge to take on the Napoleons.)
In the end, the biggest challenge may be to unite the clans so we can win the damn thing. Right now, my dream ticket is Fiorina/Rubio or Fiorina/Kasich. Fiorina's executive experience rivals the governors, and she's the sort of fighter the base is pining for. She brings a moral authority to social issues. Rubio is a talented communicator and idea man, and the Veep slot is perfect for him. Or go with Kasich, who's got everyone beat on the credentials of conventional experience, and holds the key to Ohio (which is the key to the election)