Author Topic: In 2013, Cruz suggested 'Compromise' was Possible on the 11 Million  (Read 252 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sinkspur

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,567
In 2013, Cruz Suggested ‘Compromise’ Was Possible on the 11 Million

 by ELIANA JOHNSON   

December 19, 2015 1:06 PM

 The Republican primary this week has been dominated by the clash between Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz over the nature of an amendment Cruz offered to the Gang of Eight bill and whether, by stripping the path to citizenship from the bill Cruz was trying to kill the bill, as he claims, or to aid its passage, as Rubio claims.  The result has been an increasing focus on Cruz’s true beliefs about immigration, and whether he has changed his views to shore up his support among the party’s rightmost voters.

 A 2013 interview between Cruz and CBS News’s Jan Crawford may serve only to muddy the waters further. Many have raised questions about what Cruz proposes to do with the 11 million immigrants currently in the country illegally. In the interview with Crawford, which aired about three weeks before he offered the amendment stripping the path to citizenship from the Gang of Eight bill, Cruz said, “I think there could probably be a compromise on that…if the path to citizenship was taken off the table.”

 CRAWFORD: What would you do with the eleven million people who are here illegally?

 CRUZ: I think there probably could be a compromise on that…

 CRAWFORD: A compromise?

 CRUZ: …if a path to citizenship was taken off the table.

Cruz’s national spokesman, Rick Tyler, says Cruz was merely using the language of the bill’s supporters in order to sell his amendment. “That doesn’t mean that he would give them a path to legalization, he would not,” Tyler says, “and he never supported the underlying bill, but he was using that amendment to show that this whole thing was a farce, and it worked.”

In the Republican debate earlier this week, Cruz, pressed on what he would do with the 11 million here illegally, said, “I have never supported legalization, and I do not intend to support legalization.”  Cruz also tells Crawford that he doesn’t believe the president wanted an immigration bill to pass. “I think the President wants to campaign on immigration reform in 2014 and 2016,” he said, “and I think the reason that the White House is insisting on a path to citizenship for those who are here illegally is because the White House knows that insisting on that is very likely to scuttle the bill.” That would seem to undermine Cruz’s claim that his goal in offering an amendment that removed the path to citizenship was to kill the bill. 

It wasn’t the only time Cruz made the claim. In an interview with Sean Hannity in early April of 2013, he said the path to citizenship was, on the president’s part, “designed to be a poison pill to scuttle the whole bill, so he can have a political issue in 2014 and 2016. I think that’s really unfortunate.”

According to Tyler, Cruz was responding to a “dynamic” and “changing” situation, one in which Democrats were trying to put Republicans in a “heads I win, tails you lose” situation: either they would attempt to use immigration as a political issue on the campaign trail, or they would have millions of new Democratic voters on the rolls. And that ultimately, Cruz succeeded in exposing the Gang of Eight legislation as an “amnesty bill.”

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/428789/ted-cruz-marco-rubio-immigration-2016?utm_campaign=trueAnthem%3A+Trending+Content&utm_content=5676216f04d3010901b2a95b&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter
Roy Moore's "spiritual warfare" is driving past a junior high without stopping.