Author Topic: Coca Cola, Allies and Terror  (Read 1023 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Coca Cola, Allies and Terror
« on: December 17, 2015, 04:33:11 pm »
Coca Cola, Allies and Terror
by Robert Murphy

Journal Article | December 13, 2015 - 2:56pm
 

Coca Cola, Allies and Terror

Robert Murphy

    “Purify your soul from all unclean things. Tame your soul. Convince it. Make it understand. Completely forget something called “this World.” Pray the supplication as you leave your hotel, when riding in the taxi and entering the airport. Pray the supplication before you step aboard the plane, and at the moment of death. Bless your body with verses of scripture. Rub the verses on your luggage, your clothes, your passport. Polish your knife with the verses, and be sure the blade is sharp; you must not discomfort your sacrifice.”

    -Final instructions discovered in baggage of a 9-11 hijacker

America’s approach to the threat of global terror has been one dimensional and strategically ineffective. We have slaughtered thousands of terrorist leaders and their adherents with staggering efficiency, yet have failed to be effective in destroying the beast that spawns them. This is because terrorism isn’t a global entity, it defies space and time by living in human imagination[ii]. We have neglected the philosophical underpinnings of terror that inspire hate because they are politically and socially unpopular to tackle. The conditions we either control or dismiss will determine if these ideas take root or turn into dust.

America must assault the ideologies of terror with the vigor and effort of the targeted assaults on Bin Laden and Al Zarqawi. The contemporary anti-terrorism strategy has largely been a military endeavor, and must expand to harness the power residing in American culture and intellect. Without an accompanying informational line of effort, resourced to provide a commensurate level of effectiveness, the military’s effort will be politically expedient and emotionally gratifying, but nothing else.

A new strategy must capitalize on the success of counter-terror (CT) operations through an increase the resources available to our CT organizations, who have proven themselves so effective at destroying near-term, existential terrorist threats. These threats are far more existential than those posed by threats best addressed by conventional forces. Therefore, defense budget prioritization must be oriented on enhancing CT readiness and capability. Relative to conventional warfare requirements, and given their limited scope, counter-terrorism organizations and their supporting entities are a cost effective means to protect ourselves, and deny the victories essential to terrorist recruitment.

This resource prioritization proposal is not, nor should be, a ‘this or that’ dilemma. This recommended prioritization does not advocate the complete siphoning of resources to conventional forces, but an adjustment based on a comparison of the frequency, likelihood and consequence of CT risks compared to conventional risks, and an assessment of which tools most successfully address them.

America’s assault on the ideologies that advocate terror begins with a sober assessment of our own activities to determine which are contributing to the expansion of terrorist ideology. America supports activities and regimes that fertilize otherwise dormant seeds of terror. We encourage harmful ideology through inaction and hypocrisy. We allow weeds to flourish in neglected corners of the earth and express surprise when they flower.

America allies itself and provides military support to nations like Saudi Arabia, whose ultra conservative, Wahabbist madrassas proliferate the globe and generate legions of fanatically anti-western youth[iii]. Pakistan, which encourages and sponsors many of these madrassas also explicitly organized and supported the Taliban, and likely continues to do so surreptitiously[iv].

Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are relatively simple examples. Less flagrant examples include our support for governments in Africa, Central and South America and in Asia. The analysis of our policies toward foreign states and leaders must also account for the type of hypocrisy that contributes to resentment of America’s actions. Any legitimacy regarding our obsession with removing Assad from power in Syria is perverted  by our open support of totalitarian regimes in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Azerbaijan, most of the ‘stans, Chad, Rwanda, Uganda, to name a few[v].

Our inaction in preventing Iraqi sectarianism to divide their security forces largely negating any gains made in increasing their capacity and capability.  Our further inaction to stem the growth of ISIS, as they steamrolled their way through Mosul and Ramadi revealed our true reliability as security partners, simultaneously enhancing ISIS’ esteem among an Arab youth intrigued with the group, and discouraging the commitment of necessary security partners. At least we are consistent. The Shi’a and Kurds who rose up against Saddam after the first gulf war, and Ngo Dinh Diem can attest to that.

America also consistently chooses to ignore the places on our earth not illuminated by our immediate vital interests. Somalia, for example, got our attention as a hotbed of piracy and famine, but not to the extent that we appreciated it as fertile ground to raise Al Shabaab. So too the Philippines, where the conditions of weak centralized government control and a pre-existing Islamic militant group spawned Abu Sayyaf[vi]. Both Al Shabaab and Abu Sayyaf have succeeded in expanding terror beyond the boundaries of their remote bases.

Adjusting our foreign policy is not sufficient; America must weaponize its intellect and culture. We assume that our way of life is so good, it sells itself. This is cultural hubris and what proponents of critical thinking would label as mirroring. A kid growing up in one the Saudi funded madrassas in Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Area will need more than a Coke and Star Wars to pull him off the Quranic diet that has left him with a permanent rug burn on his forehead.

Our military has deployed anthropologic research teams to support an historically unimaginative attempt to win hearts and minds in Iraq and Afghanistan. We’ve discovered that tribal populations like clean water and electricity, conveniently forgetting that these same populations exist, and have existed without either. Having read volumes of Human Assessment Team reports[vii], one consistent theme appears; Americans ignore the unpleasant social truth that a majority of those we interact with in the world really don’t care about nor understand our focus on individual liberty and egalitarianism. Yet we are inspired and encouraged by the purple fingered goatherd in a form of perverse confirmation bias that has misdirected our intellectual energies.

We have a history of leveraging Hollywood, among others, to help sell what we offer. Our reluctance or inability to do so as a nation has resulted in an inappropriate and overwhelming demand on our military public relations efforts, who are restricted by law and by resourcing from producing content in the volume and quality required to win hearts and minds. Moreover, we’ve missed an opportunity to engage an ambivalent, yet powerfully influential segment of our society, as partners in this war.

It is evident that contemporary terrorists and their aspirants are voracious consumers of social media and online content[viii]. Whereas our military employs cyber operations to manipulate this content, it is also constrained by law[ix] and resources. A joint effort between our nations’ security apparatus, the entertainment industry, commercial marketing organizations and online service providers is a critical element to eroding support for the ideologies that inspire terror.

A well organized effort to identify the social and cultural entry points into a terrorist’s recruitment population, combined with the slickness produced by the entertainment industry’s marketing and production arms would undoubtedly help eradicate terrorism’s base.

Our special operators and their supporting cast are doing a magnificent job keeping the barbarians away from the gates, but the odds of eventual success are in the terrorists’ favor. Success for a terrorist is ridiculously easy; a bomb that explodes at the first layer of any security system is sufficient to generate intimidation.

America must build a team that augments preventative CT operations with smart foreign policy and an informational blitz that dilutes the philosophical pheromones that attract so many of the World’s youth to terror.

End Notes

http://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/coca-cola-allies-and-terror
« Last Edit: December 17, 2015, 04:34:33 pm by rangerrebew »

Offline GAJohnnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,866
Re: Coca Cola, Allies and Terror
« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2015, 04:53:44 pm »
No what we need to do is complete the job rather then run away once we have the job 90% complete. Ran away from Afghanistan in 1989 got us Bin Laden and 09-11. Ran away from Iraq in 1991 and had to go back in 2003.  0 decides, for domestic political reason to pull out of Iraq in 2011, when ISIL was 95% exterminated, which allowed them to rebuild and form a "caliphate"

The problem isn't that we are not attacking the right targets, the problem is we never finish the job. We like a boxer that keeps knocking down our foe but never puts them out for the count.

Offline sinkspur

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,567
Re: Coca Cola, Allies and Terror
« Reply #2 on: December 17, 2015, 05:24:18 pm »
Ran away from Afghanistan in 1989 got us Bin Laden and 09-11

Uh, the US was never in Afghanistan in the 1980s.  You're thinking of the Soviet Union.
Roy Moore's "spiritual warfare" is driving past a junior high without stopping.

Offline GAJohnnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,866
Re: Coca Cola, Allies and Terror
« Reply #3 on: December 17, 2015, 05:32:23 pm »
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_State_of_Iraq_and_the_Levant

The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, IPA /ˈaɪsÉ™l/), alternatively translated the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria or Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS, /ˈaɪsɨs/),[29] is a Salafi jihadist militant group that adheres to an Islamic fundamentalist, Wahhabi doctrine of Sunni Islam.[30] Derived from its Arabic name ad-Dawlah al-Islāmiyah fÄ« ‘l-Ê¿Irāq wa-sh-Shām (الدولة الإسلامية في العراق والشام‎), the group is also known under the acronym Da’ish or Daesh (داعش‎, IPA: [ˈdaːʕiʃ]).[31][32]

The group has referred to itself as the Islamic State (الدولة الإسلامية‎ ad-Dawlah al-Islāmiyah) or IS[33] since it proclaimed a worldwide caliphate in June 2014[34][35] and named Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi as its caliph.[36] As a caliphate, it claims religious, political and military authority over all Muslims worldwide.[37] The group’s adoption of the name “Islamic State” and idea of a caliphate have been widely criticised, with the United Nations, various governments, and mainstream Muslim groups rejecting both. As of December 2015, the group has control over vast territories in Iraq and Syria with population estimates ranging between 2.8 million[38] and 8 million people,[39] where it enforces Sharia law. ISIL affiliates control small areas of Libya, Nigeria and Afghanistan and operate in other parts of the world, including North Africa and South Asia.[40][41][42]

ISIL gained prominence, when in early 2014 it drove Iraqi government forces out of key cities in its Western Iraq offensive,[43] followed by the capture of Mosul[44] and the Sinjar massacre,[45] almost causing a collapse of the Iraqi government and prompting a renewal of US military action in Iraq. In Syria, the group has conducted ground attacks on both government forces and rebel factions. The number of fighters the group commands in Iraq and Syria, was estimated by the CIA at 31,000, with foreign fighters accounting for around two thirds,[46] while ISIL leaders claim 40,000 fighters, with the majority being Iraqi and Syrian nationals.[26]

Adept at social media, ISIL became notorious for its videos of beheadings[47] of both soldiers and civilians, including journalists and aid workers, and for the destruction of cultural heritage sites.[48] The United Nations holds ISIL responsible for human rights abuses and war crimes, and Amnesty International has charged the group with ethnic cleansing on a “historic scale” in northern Iraq.[49] Around the world, Islamic religious leaders have overwhelmingly condemned ISIL’s ideology and actions, arguing that the group has strayed from the path of true Islam and that its actions do not reflect the religion’s real teachings or virtues.[50] The group has been designated a terrorist organisation by the United Nations, the European Union and its member states, the United States, India, Indonesia, Israel, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Iran and other countries. Over 60 countries are directly or indirectly waging war against ISIL.

The group originated as Jama’at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad in 1999, which pledged allegiance to al-Qaeda and participated in the Iraqi insurgency following the March 2003 invasion of Iraq by Western forces. Joining other Sunni insurgent groups to form the Mujahideen Shura Council, it proclaimed the formation of the Islamic State of Iraq (ISI) in October 2006. In August 2011, following the outbreak of the Syrian Civil War, ISI, under the leadership of al-Baghdadi, delegated a mission into Syria, which under the name Jabhat an-Nuá¹£rah li-Ahli ash-Shām (or al-Nusra Front) established a large presence in Sunni-majority Al-Raqqah, Idlib, Deir ez-Zor, and Aleppo provinces. The merger of ISI with al-Nusra Front to form the “Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant” (ISIL), as announced in April 2013 by al-Baghdadi, was however rejected by al-Nusra leader al-Julani and al-Qaeda leader al-Zawahiri, who subsequently cut all ties with ISIL by February 2014.[3][51][52][53]

The group has had various names since being founded in 1999 by Jordanian radical Abu Musab al-Zarqawi as Jamāʻat al-Tawḥīd wa-al-Jihād (lit. ”The Organisation of Monotheism and Jihad”).[28] When in October 2004, al-Zarqawi swore loyalty to Osama bin Laden, he renamed the group again to Tanẓīm Qāʻidat al-Jihād fÄ« Bilād al-Rāfidayn (lit. ”The Organisation of Jihad’s Base in Mesopotamia”), commonly known as al-Qaeda in Iraq or AQI.[54][55] Although the group never called itself so, al-Qaeda in Iraq remained its informal name over the years.[56]

In January 2006, AQI merged with several other Sunni insurgent groups to form the Mujahideen Shura Council.[57] After al-Zarqawi was killed in June 2006, the Mujahideen Shura Council merged in October 2006 with several more insurgent factions to establish ad-Dawlah al-Ê»Iraq al-Islāmiyah, also known as the Islamic State of Iraq (ISI),[58] led by Abu Omar al-Baghdadi and Abu Ayyub al-Masri,[59] who were killed in a US–Iraqi operation in April 2010, being succeeded by Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi as the group’s new leader.

Offline GourmetDan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,277
Re: Coca Cola, Allies and Terror
« Reply #4 on: December 17, 2015, 05:55:14 pm »
America must assault the ideologies of terror with the vigor and effort of the targeted assaults on Bin Laden and Al Zarqawi. The contemporary anti-terrorism strategy has largely been a military endeavor, and must expand to harness the power residing in American culture and intellect. Without an accompanying informational line of effort, resourced to provide a commensurate level of effectiveness, the military’s effort will be politically expedient and emotionally gratifying, but nothing else.

Actually, the way to fight muslim terrorism is at the psychological-level... defile their dead bodies (or what's left of them) so that the living ones will believe they will go to hell for their efforts instead of to heaven.

This will save both 'infidel' and muslim lives...


"The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left." - Ecclesiastes 10:2

"The sole purpose of the Republican Party is to serve as an ineffective alternative to the Democrat Party." - GourmetDan

Offline GAJohnnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,866
Re: Coca Cola, Allies and Terror
« Reply #5 on: December 17, 2015, 06:02:08 pm »
Actually, the way to fight muslim terrorism is at the psychological-level... defile their dead bodies (or what's left of them) so that the living ones will believe they will go to hell for their efforts instead of to heaven.

This will save both 'infidel' and muslim lives...

Islamic Terrorist grows when it is allowed a safe haven to train in and a funding stream to recruit with. Kill both of those and you will kill Islamic Terrorism. The problem the West has is our political/media elite see the problem as a minor annoyance, not an existential threat. We spend trillions trying to defend everything all the time instead of strangling the problem in its cradle.

Offline Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 52,405
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
Re: Coca Cola, Allies and Terror
« Reply #6 on: December 17, 2015, 06:04:32 pm »
Islamic Terrorist grows when it is allowed a safe haven to train in and a funding stream to recruit with. Kill both of those and you will kill Islamic Terrorism. The problem the West has is our political/media elite see the problem as a minor annoyance, not an existential threat. We spend trillions trying to defend everything all the time instead of strangling the problem in its cradle.

Which is exactly why the Mullah regime in Iran MUST be removed!
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien

Offline katzenjammer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,512
Re: Coca Cola, Allies and Terror
« Reply #7 on: December 17, 2015, 06:16:23 pm »
Which is exactly why the Mullah regime in Iran MUST be removed!

That is about the only regime change that makes any sense!

Give Persia back to the Persians!!