Hillary: Let’s make it easier for minority suspects to sue the police

[rangerrebew]

Hillary: Let’s make it easier for minority suspects to sue the police
 
By Dan Calabrese -- Bio and Archives  November 2, 2015
 

It makes perfect sense to me that a candidate for president who has a long history of breaking the law - including her blatant disregard for national security in the way she handled sensitive information via a non-secured homebrew e-mail server, not to mention lying to the American public about a terrorist attack that killed four people - would be interested in ways to make life more difficult for law enforcement. Who hates the police more than dishonest people who consider themselves above the law and constantly rely on legal maneuvers to get away with living that belief?

Also, when your entire public life consists of spouting meaningless bromides based neither on sincere principle nor any real knowledge, you end up proposing things like banning racial profiling by police, which makes you sound pretty stupid because laws are already in place that do this. So how do you recover from that? No problem. Send your campaign staff out to explain that you want to go even further and expose every police department in America to frivolous lawsuits:

    She proposed a legal ban on racial profiling by police. Clinton hasn’t detailed how her idea would go beyond existing law, but her campaign cited previous congressional proposals that would make it easier for alleged profiling victims to recover damages from government agencies in civil court.

It’s not hard to see where this takes us. Every minority in America who has an encounter with police that doesn’t result in the person being charged will now be able to run to race-mongering Al Sharpton types and get access to lawyers who will file suit - probably for a fee of one-third of their clients’ award and/or settlement - against the police merely for questioning their clients.
Special: One Trick Stops Erectile Dysfunction - Doctors Are Speechless

Police departments will now have to choose between risking litigation or jeopardizing their ability to solve cases, because every minority they might want to question will now present a litigation risk. That’s the direction in which Hillary wants to move the needle with respect to crime and justice in this country. Not only are the police getting attacked in the media every time they have to use force to corral a hostile suspect, but now they would have to face lawsuits just for deciding to question certain people.

Here’s a brain-teaser: Would it be worse if she had actually thought this through and believed it was a good idea? Or is it worse the way it really is, which is that she doesn’t know or care one way or the other if this is good policy, but says it anyway to appeal to cop-hating left that makes up so much of the Democrat primary voting base?

Why does anyone take this woman seriously?
 
http://canadafreepress.com/article/76481

[libertybele]

Let's see.. Clinton thinks there are a disproportionate amount of minorities who get the death  penalty and we should make it easier for minorities to sue. Nope, she's not trying to get the Black or Hispanic vote at all; nor is there a racist thought in her comments.   

[GourmetDan]

Police departments will now have to choose between risking litigation or jeopardizing their ability to solve cases, because every minority they might want to question will now present a litigation risk. That’s the direction in which Hillary wants to move the needle with respect to crime and justice in this country. Not only are the police getting attacked in the media every time they have to use force to corral a hostile suspect, but now they would have to face lawsuits just for deciding to question certain people.

Just the logical next-step for globalist 'leaders' whose aim is to destroy the culture of the United States and make the NWO easier to accept.

Her Heinous does not need to pander for black and hispanic votes in the first place...

[andy58-in-nh]

Perhaps it is because I grew up in the country formerly known as the "United States of America" that I recall from my schooling that "due process" and "equal justice under the law" were vital constitutional precepts that precluded any consideration of race.  We all had the same rights, the same duties, the same responsibilities, or should have.  And..... it's gone.

It's gone because "affirmative action" killed it. Once the Supreme Court signed off on it (the Bakke decision), the jig was up (can I still say that, or is that now some species of racist "micro-aggression"?) 

Once the camel's nose was invited under the tent (that's anti-Islamic, right?), it became acceptable for government or individuals acting under color of law to discriminate in favor of one group as long as they were deemed to be "disadvantaged", while all the while pretending not to be discriminating against another.

Thus, the Supreme Court signed off on the creation of one class of accredited victims, and by logical extension, another class of designated oppressors who one was free to attack and plunder, without admitting as much.

"Political correctness", as we now know it, was born of the invidious, divisive, frankly anti-American idea that immutable personal characteristics such as race and gender (all twelve of them, now, at last count) trump equality under the law. 

And today, the bitter harvest of a rotten crop is making us all sicker by the day.