Author Topic: Human Rights Activist: China's One-Child Policy 'Greatest Human Rights Atrocity on Earth’  (Read 1000 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest

Human Rights Activist: China's One-Child Policy 'Greatest Human Rights Atrocity on Earth’

(CNSNews.com) – Visiting Chinese President Xi Jinping’s state dinner in Washington Friday is taking place on the 35th anniversary of the launch of Beijing’s controversial “one-child” policy, prompting a campaigner against the policy to urge him in an open letter to “end the greatest human rights atrocity on earth today.”

Designed by the communist regime to keep China’s population growth in check, the birth-limitation regulations have been enforced, according to researchers, through abuses ranging from coerced abortions and sterilizations to prohibitive fines, loss of jobs or other punishments for those who contravene their birth quota.

Despite amendments to the policy in recent years – for instance, allowing urban couples to have a second child if one parent is an only child, rather than both parents as previously mandated – critics say rampant abuses continue.

“It is time for the coercive enforcement of the one-child policy to end,” Women’s Rights Without Frontiers president Reggie Littlejohn wrote in the open letter to the Chinese leader.

“It will not work to replace it by a ‘two-child policy’ as some of your advisors have suggested. Rather, official, state-sponsored forced abortion under the one-child policy should be eradicated from the face of the earth, because it has caused more violence toward women and girls than any other official policy on earth, and any other official policy in the history of the world.”

On Friday night, President Obama will host Xi for a lavish state dinner at the White House – the ninth of Obama’s presidency – with fine wines, Colorado lamb, Maine lobster and R&B entertainment on the menu.

September 25, 1980 is generally viewed as the start date of the one-child policy. On that day the Communist Party’s central committee sent an open letter to all party members and the Communist Youth League, instructing all to adhere to a “one-couple one-child” rule that had been voluntarily and unevenly applied over the previous several years.

Government officials characterize as a success the fact that 400 million births have been “prevented” since the policy was put into place.

“We’ve taken only 30 years to almost achieve what developed countries have done with population control targets in 100 years,” the head of Beijing’s family planning body, Zhang Weiqing, boasted several years ago. “I have to say our work is commendable.”

In her letter to Xi Littlejohn, an American attorney who has testified to lawmakers in the U.S., Europe and Canada on the China policy, cited that 400 million figure.

“These births have been prevented through forced abortions, involuntary sterilizations, confiscatory ‘terror fines,’ gendercide and infanticide – all in violation of international human rights law,” she wrote.

Obama urged to press Xi on human rights

In a society that favors boys for cultural and economic reasons but where family sizes are also limited by the state, sex-selective abortions are believed to occur frequently.

The result has been an increasingly lopsided boy-to-girl ratio in Chinese society, which experts warn could seriously destabilize Chinese society in the coming years. The policy has already been blamed for a recorded rise in cross-border trafficking of women and girls into China from south-east Asia and elsewhere.

“The Chinese government’s birth limitation policy and a cultural preference for sons create a skewed sex ratio of 117 boys to 100 girls in China, which may serve to increase the demand for prostitution and for foreign women as brides for Chinese men – both of which may be procured by force or coercion,” the State Department says in its 2015 trafficking in persons report.

“Women and girls are recruited through marriage brokers and transported to China, where some are subjected to forced prostitution or forced labor.”

Other less obvious social ills attributed to China’s policy include people being driven to mental breakdown or suicide, and recorded increases in Chinese rates of breast cancer [1], allegedly linked to abortion, and especially to multiple abortions. (Some 13 million abortions take places in China each year, according to official figures.)

“President Xi Jinping, you are uniquely positioned to end the greatest human rights atrocity on earth today,” Littlejohn wrote. “Since you are able to accomplish this, you are morally obligated to do so.”

“Let this be the legacy of your presidency: to transform Chinese law and culture so that women can truly ‘hold up half the sky,’” she concluded, citing an expression attributed to communist China’s founder Mao Zedong.

Human rights campaigners say that China’s human rights record in general has worsened under Xi’s presidency.

At a Congressional-Executive Commission on China hearing [2] last week, chairman Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J.) said the commission’s latest annual report, to be released within weeks, will find that Beijing’s efforts “to silence dissent, suppress human rights advocacy, and control civil society are broader in scope than any other period documented since the commission started issuing annual reports in 2002.”

Half a dozen human rights groups are organizing a lunchtime rally outside the White House Friday, to urge Obama to press Xi on human rights during the visit.

“Since Xi Jinping became president of China, Chinese Christians, journalists, human rights lawyers, Tibetans, Uighurs, Mongols and many other communities have suffered increased persecution and an unrelenting assault on their basic human rights,” according to China Aid Association, one of the participating groups.

Source URL: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/35th-anniversary-one-child-policy-campaigner-challenges-xi-end

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Millions of children starving is a better "human right," I guess. :shrug:

Offline musiclady

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,682
"Family planning" = slaughtering innocent children.

I'm surprised the murderous left hasn't mandated this policy in America.
Character still matters.  It always matters.

I wear a mask as an exercise in liberty and love for others.  To see it as an infringement of liberty is to entirely miss the point.  Be kind.

"Sometimes I think the Church would be better off if we would call a moratorium on activity for about six weeks and just wait on God to see what He is waiting to do for us. That's what they did before Pentecost."   - A. W. Tozer

Use the time God is giving us to seek His will and feel His presence.

Godzilla

  • Guest
Millions of children starving is a better "human right," I guess. :shrug:

This.

Offline musiclady

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,682
Millions of children starving is a better "human right," I guess. :shrug:

I'm not sure what you're saying here.  Would you mind explaining?
Character still matters.  It always matters.

I wear a mask as an exercise in liberty and love for others.  To see it as an infringement of liberty is to entirely miss the point.  Be kind.

"Sometimes I think the Church would be better off if we would call a moratorium on activity for about six weeks and just wait on God to see what He is waiting to do for us. That's what they did before Pentecost."   - A. W. Tozer

Use the time God is giving us to seek His will and feel His presence.

Offline massadvj

  • Editorial Advisor
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,366
  • Gender: Male
I'm surprised the murderous left hasn't mandated this policy in America.

It's just a matter of time. 

Offline musiclady

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,682
It's just a matter of time.

I'm afraid you're right about that. 

They're already 'celebrating' their abortions.  How long can it be until they force them on others to assure 'women's health?'
Character still matters.  It always matters.

I wear a mask as an exercise in liberty and love for others.  To see it as an infringement of liberty is to entirely miss the point.  Be kind.

"Sometimes I think the Church would be better off if we would call a moratorium on activity for about six weeks and just wait on God to see what He is waiting to do for us. That's what they did before Pentecost."   - A. W. Tozer

Use the time God is giving us to seek His will and feel His presence.

Offline mountaineer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,950
What Vic said, exactly. I'm reminded of Francis Schaeffer's "Whatever Happened to the Human Race?"
Support Israel's emergency medical service. afmda.org

Offline musiclady

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,682
What Vic said, exactly. I'm reminded of Francis Schaeffer's "Whatever Happened to the Human Race?"

Schaeffer was prescient in so many ways.

I remember when Time Magazine referred to him as a "pseudo-intellectual."  Not hard to see that even 30 years ago the left couldn't tolerate a brilliant Christian.  To them it was an oxymoron.  Christians, to the left, are by their very nature, stupid people.
Character still matters.  It always matters.

I wear a mask as an exercise in liberty and love for others.  To see it as an infringement of liberty is to entirely miss the point.  Be kind.

"Sometimes I think the Church would be better off if we would call a moratorium on activity for about six weeks and just wait on God to see what He is waiting to do for us. That's what they did before Pentecost."   - A. W. Tozer

Use the time God is giving us to seek His will and feel His presence.

Offline flowers

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,798


Offline flowers

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,798
It's just a matter of time.
The gov will appoint another czar, call it the Family Planing Czar.


Godzilla

  • Guest
I'm not sure what you're saying here.  Would you mind explaining?

China suffered massive famines as their population outstripped their ability to feed themselves.

So it boils down to an aborted baby or one dead from starvation.  Both are dead.  Which choice would you find more humane.
« Last Edit: September 26, 2015, 08:09:51 pm by Godzilla »

Offline musiclady

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,682
China suffered massive famines as their population outstripped their ability to feed themselves.

So it boils down to an aborted baby or one dead from starvation.  Both are dead.  Which choice would you find more humane.

Extremely careless logic.  You are presuming the death of the child that was born, but you cannot prove that child, or any other would starve because of a birth.

You are murdering one child in hopes, but no guarantee of saving another.

VERY bad choice.  VERY inhumane.
Character still matters.  It always matters.

I wear a mask as an exercise in liberty and love for others.  To see it as an infringement of liberty is to entirely miss the point.  Be kind.

"Sometimes I think the Church would be better off if we would call a moratorium on activity for about six weeks and just wait on God to see what He is waiting to do for us. That's what they did before Pentecost."   - A. W. Tozer

Use the time God is giving us to seek His will and feel His presence.

Godzilla

  • Guest
Extremely careless logic.  You are presuming the death of the child that was born, but you cannot prove that child, or any other would starve because of a birth.

You are murdering one child in hopes, but no guarantee of saving another.

VERY bad choice.  VERY inhumane.

Not on the farmer's level.  When the farmer's family is starving, the wife is pregnant, and they have two children... the choice becomes simple.

Sell the children into indentured servitude, kill the unborn child, sell the land and hope for better in a city, or starve.

The Chinese people lived through just that.  And their government chose the option of abortion as the least awful.

You should read "The Good Earth" for an idea of how China was in the late 1800s and early 20th century.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Good_Earth

Offline musiclady

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,682
Not on the farmer's level.  When the farmer's family is starving, the wife is pregnant, and they have two children... the choice becomes simple.

Sell the children into indentured servitude, kill the unborn child, sell the land and hope for better in a city, or starve.

The Chinese people lived through just that.  And their government chose the option of abortion as the least awful.

You should read "The Good Earth" for an idea of how China was in the late 1800s and early 20th century.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Good_Earth

Thanks for the recommendation of the book.   (I have seen the 1937 movie version with Paul Muni)

Regardless of the situation, however, no amount of hardship excuses the murder of a child.  It is such indifference to the lives of the unborn that have gotten us into the deep, evil mess we're in now.

I'm not disagreeing that killing your own child might be something that an impoverished farmer (especially to one who doesn't know the love of Christ) might want to make, but it is never a 'humane' decision.  It is always wrong, unless the mother will surely die if the child is born.

And that almost never, ever happens.
Character still matters.  It always matters.

I wear a mask as an exercise in liberty and love for others.  To see it as an infringement of liberty is to entirely miss the point.  Be kind.

"Sometimes I think the Church would be better off if we would call a moratorium on activity for about six weeks and just wait on God to see what He is waiting to do for us. That's what they did before Pentecost."   - A. W. Tozer

Use the time God is giving us to seek His will and feel His presence.