Oh, sweet heavens. You will be shocked to be told Mercer Island is a suburb of Seattle, separated from it only by a lake. It is also very exclusive, very wealthy (old money), and apparently very nutty in the typically goofy Liberal way.
"What have our schools become when administrators ban the game of tag over the emotional well-being of kids? Well, a laughing stock.
But that hasn't stopped the Mercer Island School District from banning the harmless game without even consulting parents.
The school district's communications director Macy Grade, in an email, told Q13 that the "rationale behind this [ban] is to ensure the physical and emotional safety of all students."
Emotional safety? Are kids such wimps that they become traumatized while chased in a game they volunteer to play? Or is that the hyper-sensitive, hyper-protective school district feels the need to protect students from made up dangers to justify their paychecks?
They also address physical safety, wanting kids to "keep their hands to themselves." After all, a pat on the back in a voluntary game of tag might ... make you mildly uncomfortable?
Of course, the ban doesn't make a lick of sense, particularly in the context of what other activities the school offers.
The school promotes competitive sports like football, which is like tag only instead of gently tagging someone and saying "you're it," students will viciously tackle their opponents. Further, the school also provides for wrestling; again, considerably more violent and dangerous than a game of tag.
The only difference I can find behind this kind of hypocrisy is that they charge students $190 per sport in order to participate (this fee was recently raised $15 - perhaps that will go to counseling for the players - they likely will suffer emotional damage from all the rough play, right?). Or perhaps the school can't charge $190 for tag, so they'll ban it. "
http://mynorthwest.com/992/2815456/Rantz-Local-school-district-bans-Tag-over-emotional-wellbeing-of-students
