Author Topic: Why is the UK still so reliant on the Tornado?  (Read 712 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Why is the UK still so reliant on the Tornado?
« on: August 05, 2015, 09:21:45 pm »
Why is the UK still so reliant on the Tornado?

By Jon Kelly
BBC News Magazine


5 August 2015

 From the section Magazine
 

The RAF Tornado mission in Iraq, which was supposed to be disbanded last March, will be extended until "at least" March 2017. Why has this veteran Cold War combat jet proved so enduring?

The cockpit of a supersonic Tornado attack bomber is a much more peaceful place than you might expect.

"It's incredibly quiet," says Jas Hawker, a former RAF wing commander who flew the aircraft over Iraq and Kosovo. "The pilot and the navigator could drop their oxygen masks and talk to each other. It's not silent but it's a lot quieter than people think."

It also has a rather retro feel, as befits a four-decade-old model approaching the end of its time in service. "It's still full of 1980s dials," says Hawker. There isn't the array of screens you might see in more modern fighters, he adds.

Despite this, it's just been given a new lease of life.




Two Royal Air Force Tornado GR4s prepare to arrive at Royal Air Force (RAF) Marham on November 15, 2014
The eight Tornado GR4 fighter bombers launching ground attacks against the Islamic State group in Iraq - Number 12 Squadron, which is deployed in Cyprus - were due to be disbanded last year and replaced with more modern Eurofighter Typhoons.

But then Prime Minister David Cameron announced the Tornados' mission would continue until March 2016, and on Tuesday Defence Secretary Michael Fallon announced it would be extended by a further year.

It's a distinction for an aircraft that was conceived in the late 1960s, flew for the first time in 1974 and entered service in 1980. The RAF's Tornado fleet is due to retire in 2019, the date having been brought forward from the original deadline of 2025.

The jet is very much a product of its era. The Panavia Tornado was developed jointly by the UK, Germany and Italy to fly low and fast, avoiding Soviet air defences. Over time its bombing capacity was developed.

Compared with the Typhoon, which entered service with the RAF as recently as 2007, the much older Tornado is less manoeuvrable, having been primarily designed to fly quickly in straight lines at a low level.

But the GR4 has a major advantage over the newer model, says Nick de Larrinaga, Europe editor of IHS Jane's Defence Weekly: "They can carry the Brimstone air-to-surface missile which the RAF has found very useful." These are designed to minimise collateral damage and are capable of hitting moving targets.

Because the Tornado is a relatively large aircraft, it can carry a lot of these - 12 in four sets of three. As yet, the Typhoons are not equipped to carry them. Until Brimstone can be integrated with the newer jet, the GR4 has an advantage.

Flight Lieutenant Ian Abson, from RAF 617 squadron based at Lossiemouth inspects a Tornado during War Week Mission Rehearsal Exercise, in preparation for their final Afghanistan deployment on October 2, 2013
Tornados were used more than Typhoons during Nato air strikes in Libya in 2011 because the former were equipped with Brimstone and the latest 500lb Paveway IV laser and GPS-guided bomb. Typhoons have only been able to use Paveway IV since 2014, and in Libya they had to use the older and larger 1,000lb or 2,000lb Paveway II.

The GR4 is also equipped with Reconnaissance Airborne Pod for Tornado (Raptor), a sensor that is capable of taking highly detailed images day or night.

While the Eurofighter Typhoon project has faced delays and overspends since it was conceived in 1984, the Tornado remains a dependable aircraft. In the RAF, it is also popular with pilots.

"It's actually quite easy to fly," says Hawker. It's computerised and has hydro-mechanical flight controls. The variable-sweep wings, which allow the pilot to configure the wings according to flying speed, are swiped backwards and forwards manually. The two-seat cockpit is fairly spacious in comparison with other combat aircraft, although crews can be strapped to their seats for up to eight hours at a time during missions.

But, Hawker says, the large number of sensors can be difficult to operate - this is generally done by the navigator in the rear seat.

There were different versions of the Tornado. The British developed an air defence version, the F3, to intercept Russian bombers, which was retired in March 2011 and replaced with the Typhoon. There was also a reconnaissance variant, the GR1A, which was superceded by the GR4A, and an anti-shipping model, the GR1B. Germany and Italy also had an electronic combat/reconnaissance (ECR) version.

It's the interdictor/strike (IDS) variant that is currently flying missions from Cyprus to Iraq. Originally designated the GR1, some 228 entered service in the early 1980s and 142 of these were upgraded to being GR4s between 1997 and 2003.

Some 60 GR1s took part in Operation Granby, the British military deployment during the 1991 Gulf War. Six of them were lost. RAF Pilot John Peters and navigator John Nichol were paraded in front of cameras by their Iraqi captors after their Tornado was shot down . The two flight lieutenants were held captive for a total of 47 days.

line
RAF Tornado GR4 specifications

Nose of RAF Tornado◾Engines: Two RR RB199 Mk103 turbofans
◾Thrust: 16,000lb each
◾Max speed: 1.3 Mach
◾Length: 16.72m
◾Max altitude: 50,000ft
◾Span: 8.6m
◾Aircrew: Two

Source: RAF website

line
RAF Tornados took part in the 1999 Kosovo war and the GR4 upgrade was completed in time for Operation Telic, the UK's deployment in Iraq from 2003 to 2011. Tornados were used in Afghanistan from 2009 until the withdrawal of UK forces in 2014. According to the Ministry of Defence, they flew over 5,000 sorties and logged more than 33,500 flight hours during this time.

In 2010, the coalition government's Strategic Defence and Security Review concluded that the Harrier GR7/GR9 should be retired and that the Tornados could be the RAF's main strike aircraft until the Typhoon was ready to assume the role.

For all that it was conceived during the Cold War, the Tornado has proved remarkably effective at modern warfare, where targeted air attacks are a key part of military action, says de Larrinaga.

"If you go back to the RAF during World War Two, they would count a hit as any bomb within five miles of the target," he says. "Five metres would be considered a miss these days. The emphasis is really on precision."

But as aircraft grow older they become more expensive to repair, hence the gradual phasing out of the Tornado in favour of the Typhoon.

While there are plenty of pilots still trained to fly them, there are fewer Tornado navigators since the RAF stopped training them in 2009, says defence analyst Paul Beaver. Nonetheless, the GR4 remains popular with those who fly and operate it.

"The crews like it because it's dependable," he says. "You press a button and it starts."

http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-33772093
« Last Edit: August 05, 2015, 09:22:52 pm by rangerrebew »

Offline EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,804
  • Gender: Male
  • Cats rule. Dogs drool.
Re: Why is the UK still so reliant on the Tornado?
« Reply #1 on: August 05, 2015, 09:40:43 pm »
It's a good plane. Well designed, does exactly what it was designed for and a little bit more. Why not keep using it? Not like we've got a powerhouse economy.
The universe doesn't hate you. Unless your name is Tsutomu Yamaguchi

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Online Free Vulcan

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,889
  • Gender: Male
  • Ah, the air is so much fresher here...
Re: Why is the UK still so reliant on the Tornado?
« Reply #2 on: August 05, 2015, 10:05:54 pm »
It's a good plane. Well designed, does exactly what it was designed for and a little bit more. Why not keep using it? Not like we've got a powerhouse economy.

And it is very expensive to develop the next generation, which is becoming so complex to design and build that half the time they don't work properly if they ever get delivered at all.
The Republic is lost.

Offline EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,804
  • Gender: Male
  • Cats rule. Dogs drool.
Re: Why is the UK still so reliant on the Tornado?
« Reply #3 on: August 05, 2015, 11:10:25 pm »
It's the whole "the airframe must be all things to all services" that causes the biggest problems there.

A single source craft with a multi role function sounds perfect, but we've seen too often what happens when it is attempted. The Tornado is a medium bomber, pure and simple. Sure, you can dogfight them, badly (think the original F4 levels of bad). You can use them as target designation systems. You can even use them for close support if you have a pilot you want removing from this mortal coil!

Single task units seem more expensive - you need 5 different planes to cover the roles required - but it's actually cheaper since the parameters the frame will have to withstand are known and, with only one or two variants, maintenance errors drop to almost nothing.
The universe doesn't hate you. Unless your name is Tsutomu Yamaguchi

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink