Hillary's email troubles deepen

[mystery-ak]

http://thehill.com/policy/defense/249149-hillarys-email-troubles-deepen

 By Martin Matishak and Ben Kamisar - 07/24/15 04:46 PM EDT

Federal officials on Friday confirmed they have been asked to investigate Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server as secretary of State, deepening the political controversy surrounding the 2016 Democratic front-runner.

Clinton and her team fiercely pushed back at reports that two inspectors general have asked the Justice Department to look into whether sensitive information was mishandled in connection with her private account.

“Maybe the heat is getting to everybody,” Clinton quipped during an economic address in New York City in which she decried “inaccuracies” in the reports.

But the reports gave a new opening to congressional Republicans, who seized the opportunity to renew their calls that Clinton hand over her personal server as part of their investigation in the deadly 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi, Libya.

The news overshadowed an Clinton's speech and accentuated a challenging week for her campaign marked by a new poll showing her losing head-to-head match-ups with three top GOP White House contenders in the swing states of Virginia, Colorado and Iowa.

Republicans have seized on the revelation that Clinton used a private server while heading the State Department to paint her as untrustworthy, an issue where polls suggest she is vulnerable.

This week’s poll by Quinnipiac University showed large majorities of voters in Iowa, Virginia and Colorado — three swing states Democrats hope to win — do not find her honest and trustworthy. The margin in the Colorado poll between those who don't trust her and those who do was almost 2-to-1. 

The new email troubles started late Thursday, when The New York Times reported that two inspectors general have asked the Justice Department to determine “whether sensitive government information was mishandled in connection with the personal email account” of Clinton.

A second report by The Wall Street Journal on Friday said the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community told Congress in a letter that at least four emails out of a small sampling of 40 from her Clinton’s server should have been classified as "secret."

Clinton argued the reports were misleading, and media outlets backtracked on an initial report that watchdogs had requested a “criminal probe,” something Justice said was incorrect.

“We all have a responsibility to get this right, I have released 55,000 pages of emails, I have said repeatedly that I will answer questions in front of the House committee,” Clinton said at her address in New York, where she outlined a tax plan and endorsed New York’s move toward a $15 minimum wage.

“We are all accountable to the American people to get their facts right, and I will do my part, but I will also stay focused on the issues,” added Clinton, who let her frustration with the stories show.

Democrats rallied to Clinton’s defense, characterizing the referral from the federal watchdogs as routine.

“It is appalling that people who want to attack Secretary Clinton continue to leak inaccurate information to generate bogus stories and front-page headlines,” said Rep. Elijah Cummings (Md.), the top Democrat on the House Select Committee on Benghazi who has become a vocal defender of Clinton.

Still, the news that watchdogs are requesting a deeper investigation of the emails ensures the fight over the private server will go on, creating a persistent headache for Clinton.

“If Secretary Clinton truly has nothing to hide, she can prove it by immediately turning over her server to the proper authorities and allowing them to examine the complete record,” Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) said in a statement.

“What these reports demonstrate is the inherent risk of conducting our nation’s diplomacy and foreign policy on your home email and personal server,” he added. “Her poor judgment has undermined our national security and it is time for her to finally do the right thing.”

The government watchdogs that made the referral on Friday afternoon issued a joint statement explaining their concerns.

“This classified information should never have been transmitted via an unclassified personal system,” the inspectors general for the State Department and intelligence community said.

The watchdogs said the “main purpose” of their referral to Justice “was to notify security officials that classified information may exist on at least one private server and thumb drive that are not in the government’s possession.”

Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), the chairman of the Benghazi Committee, homed in on the question of whether Clinton ever sent classified material on her personal server.

“There is clearly sufficient cause to examine the contents of said server for the presence of other classified information,” Gowdy said in a statement.

Back in March, when Clinton confirmed the use of her personal email account, she categorically denied sending emails on it that contained classified information.

“I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email. There is no classified material,” Clinton said at the time. “I’m certainly aware of the classified requirements and did not send classified material.”

Congressional Republicans have tried to hang those words around her neck, and they are likely to pound the issue in the weeks to come as they seek a forensic analysis of her email server.

Gowdy said he “appreciates” that the agency watchdogs involved “have confirmed this is a serious and nonpartisan national security matter by any objective measure.”

Despite the rekindled controversy, Clinton pressed on at the previously scheduled speech, making her brief fiery comments before shifting back to her economic message.

As she left the stage, the Gym Class Heroes song “The Fighter” echoed from the speakers.

— Updated at 5:25 p.m.

[rangerrebew]

Sympathetic AP on Hillary Emails: Darn It, They're Such a Distraction
 
By Tom Blumer | July 24, 2015 | 11:50 PM EDT
 
 

The press — especially the Associated Press — wants everyone to know that the email controversy "swirling" around her is partisan and distracting. Why anyone would worry about its national security or legal implications is almost completely lost on them. That's their story, and they've been sticking to it for months.

The latest installment from the AP came tonight from Lisa Lerner, Eric Tucker and three other contributing reporters. Even though it's at the core of the firestorm over her undisclosed use of a private server out of her home, the term "national security" didn't appear until Paragraph 17 — and even then it was in a quote from a Republican. The big problem, from the AP team's perspective, is capsulized in their report's pity-party headline and opening paragraphs (bolds are mine):


NEW INQUIRY INTO CLINTON EMAILS FUELS POLITICAL QUESTIONS

A new letter by intelligence investigators to the Justice Department says secret government information may have been compromised in Hillary Rodham Clinton's private server, underscoring an inescapable reality for her presidential campaign: Email is forever.

Clinton, the former secretary of state and now the leading Democratic presidential candidate, wants to focus on the economic issues she and her team believe will drive the next election. But they remain unable to fully escape the swirling questions surrounding her decision to run her State Department correspondence through an unsecured system set up at her New York home.

Darn it, why won't these people just let her "escape" reality and all these "questions" so she can "focus" on the economy, and we can tell everyone how wonderful those ideas are?

 


 

The AP team continued in that same vein a couple of paragraphs later:


Though the referral to the Justice Department does not seek a criminal probe and does not specifically target Clinton, the latest steps by government investigators will further fuel the partisan furor surrounding the 55,000 pages of emails already under review by the State Department.

A statement from the intelligence inspector general, I. Charles McCullough, and his counterpart at the State Department, Steve Linick, said that McCullough's office found four emails containing classified information in a limited sample of 40 emails.

"This classified information should have never been transmitted via an unclassified personal system," they said.

For Clinton, the news amounted to a major distraction on a day when she'd hoped to focus on unveiling a new set of economic policies. Instead, she opened her New York City speech by addressing the controversy, decrying some reports as inaccurate.

Here's the fun part: The AP team spent so much time whining about the "distraction" that it too failed to write up anything about Mrs. Clinton's supposedly wondrous economic policies. Those who believe that the wire service avoided going there because those policies are more stale than a 1940s Henry Wallace manifesto and destined to fail spectacularly aren't too far off. Here's part of CNN's related coverage:


Clinton's speech, however, was short on rhetoric aimed directly at Wall Street and big banks, something progressives are hungry to see from the former New York senator who has deep ties to the financial industry. Clinton's aides set expectations early, telling reporters before the speech that Friday's event would not be chock full of the Wall Street red meat that liberals are pining for.

Instead, Clinton outlined a series of policy proposals that she hopes would rebuild "a connection between companies and their workers, so that workers are seen as assets rather than costs," her campaign aides said.

"It's time to return to an old-fashioned idea," Clinton said, "that companies' responsibility to their shareholders also encompasses a responsibility to employees, customers, communities and ultimately to our country, and yes, our planet."

Clinton notably endorsed New York City's plan of raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour for fast food workers, but did not go as far as endorsing a $15 federal minimum wage.

Zzzzz ... zzzz ... zzz ... oh, excuse me, this stuff is so tired I couldn't help but doze off.

Of course, unlike Clay Waters at NewsBusters, who described the matter nicely earlier today, the AP failed to report that the Clinton team demanded and got changes to reports on the situation at the New York Times. The Times reporter Michael Schmidt has admitted that revisions were made at Team Clinton's request.

Even if those requested changes were accurate, the Time's failure to retain its original report so readers could see the changes it made — one has to rely on those at other web sites who noticed it and documented the changes when they occurred — confirm that the Old Gray Lady has collapsed into becoming the head Hillary lapdog — though, as seen here, the Associated Press with its pity-party reporting is running a close second.

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.


 



Source URL: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/tom-blumer/2015/07/24/sympathetic-ap-hillary-emails-darn-it-theyre-such-distraction