Author Topic: President Obama asserts power over small waterways  (Read 627 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 385,483
  • Let's Go Brandon!
President Obama asserts power over small waterways
« on: May 27, 2015, 04:11:33 pm »
http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/243179-obama-asserts-power-over-small-waterways

 By Timothy Cama - 05/27/15 10:05 AM EDT

The Obama administration on Wednesday asserted its authority over the nation's streams, wetlands and other smaller waterways, moving forward with one of the most controversial environmental regulations in recent years.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers said they are making final their proposed waters of the United States rule, which Republicans and many businesses have long panned as a massive federal overreach that would put the EPA in charge of ditches, puddles and wet areas.

“We’re finalizing a clean water rule to protect the streams and the wetlands that one in three Americans rely on for drinking water. And we’re doing that without creating any new permitting requirements and maintaining all previous exemptions and exclusions,” EPA head Gina McCarthy told reporters Wednesday.

McCarthy and other Obama officials sought to emphasize that the rule is about increasing clarity for businesses and helping make it easier to determine which waterways are subject to the pollution rules of the Clean Water Act.

“This rule is about clarification, and in fact, we’re adding exclusions for features like artificial lakes and ponds, water-filled depressions from constructions and grass swales,” she said

“This rule will make it easier to identify protected waters and will make those protections consistent with the law as well as the latest peer-reviewed science. This rule is based on science,” she continued.

With the Wednesday action, the Obama administration is doubling down on an effort that has sustained repeated attacks from congressional Republicans hoping to overturn the regulations.

In doing so, the administration is fulfilling what it sees as a responsibility to protect the wetlands, headwaters and small water bodies that can carry pollution to the larger waterways, like bays and rivers, that are more clearly protected by the Clean Water Act. Officials said the rule was made necessary by a pair of Supreme Court decisions in the last decade that called into question Clean Water Act protections for some small tributaries, streams and wetlands that were previously covered.

Brian Deese, Obama’s top environmental adviser, said the rule “is an important win for public health and for our economy,” and sought to paint its opponents as fighting clean water.

“The only people with reason to oppose the rule are polluters who want to threaten our clean water,” he said.

McCarthy said the regulation would result in a modest increase in the federal government’s jurisdiction, amounting to less than a 3 percent growth.

Responding to criticisms from farmers, ranchers, developers, manufacturers and others, she took time to list what is not covered by the waters of the United States rule.

“It does not interfere with private property rights or address land use,” she said. “It does not regulate any ditches unless they function as tributaries. It does not apply to groundwater or shallow subsurface water, copper tile drains or change policy on irrigation or water transfer.”

She said the rule specifically does not interfere with agriculture, nor roll back any of the existing exemptions for farmers, ranchers or foresters.

Those have been some of the most vocal opponents of the rule since it was proposed in March 2014, saying that the EPA wants to insert itself into their businesses.

While critics are unlikely to be pleased by the new rule, the EPA’s supporters applauded it.

“The Obama administration listened to all perspectives and developed a final rule that will help guarantee safe drinking water supplies for American families and businesses and restore much-needed certainty, consistency, and effectiveness to the Clean Water Act,” Sen. Barbara Boxer (Calif.), top Democrat on the Environment and Public Works Committee, said in a statement.

Environment America said the rule is an important step toward protecting drinking water for the one in three Americans whose drinking water was not sufficiently protected before.

“Our rivers, lakes, and drinking water can only be clean if the streams that flow into them are protected,” Margie Alt, executive director of Environment America, said in a statement. “That’s why today’s action is the biggest victory for clean water in a decade.”

The House has voted multiple times to overturn the rule in its draft form. Senate Republicans have taken a different strategy, with a bill to overturn the rule and give the EPA specific instructions and a deadline to re-write it.

But the White House has remained steadfast in its push to enact the rule. On Wednesday, President Obama defended the regulation as protecting vulnerable waterways and providing clear guidance to businesses that are affected.
“Too many of our waters have been left vulnerable to pollution,” Obama said in a statement, adding that the federal agencies wrote the rule to “restore protection for the streams and wetlands that form the foundation of our nation’s water resources, without getting in the way of farming, ranching, or forestry.
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 385,483
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Re: President Obama asserts power over small waterways
« Reply #1 on: May 27, 2015, 04:12:34 pm »
http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/243193-gop-vows-to-fight-obamas-power-grab-water-regulation

GOP vows fight against Obama’s ‘power grab’ water rule

 By Timothy Cama - 05/27/15 11:40 AM EDT

Congressional Republicans promised Wednesday to fight to overturn the Obama administration’s regulation asserting control over small waterways like streams and ponds.

Lawmakers in each chamber of Congress said they would pursue legislative outlets to overturn the rule that they characterized as a massive overreach by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Army Corps of Engineers, well beyond their legal authority.

“The Obama administration’s new regulation implies that Washington bureaucrats know better than the people of our state,” Sen. Deb Fischer (R-Neb.) said in a statement.

“This rule is reckless and unwarranted, and I will work tirelessly to stop this expansion of federal control,” she said.

Fischer said the rule would extend federal control over Nebraska’s water resources and burden families with expensive permit requirements.

She is sponsoring a bill with Sens. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) and others that would overturn the rule and give the EPA instructions and a deadline for rewriting it.

House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) was more forceful with his condemnation.

“The administration’s decree to unilaterally expand federal authority is a raw and tyrannical power grab that will crush jobs,” he said, noting that the majority of the House has joined various government leaders in fighting the rule.

“These leaders know firsthand that the rule is being shoved down the throats of hardworking people with no input, and places landowners, small businesses, farmers, and manufacturers on the road to a regulatory and economic hell,” Boehner said.

The House has voted multiple times to overturn the water rule.

The EPA made the waters of the United States rule final Wednesday, promising that it would both protect the small waterways that can bring pollution to bigger ones and provide certainty for businesses and others.

Foreseeing criticisms, EPA head Gina McCarthy highlighted what the rule does not cover, like agricultural, ditches, groundwater and others.

But that was not enough for the rule’s opponents.

In fact, Inhofe, chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee, said the EPA made its rule broader than the proposal by allowing the government to regulate “regional water treasures.”

“The EPA has set themselves up to increase federal control over private lands, and I will not allow it,” Inhofe said in a statement.

“Our committee is planning for a markup on S. 1140 this summer, as we continue our work to halt EPA’s unprecedented land grab and refocus its job on protecting traditional navigable waters from pollution,” he said, referring to the bill to force the EPA to rewrite the regulation.

But the opponents may have a tough time getting any repeal of the rule past President Obama.

He released a statement Wednesday expressing strong support for the rule and saying it “will provide the clarity and certainty businesses and industry need about which waters are protected by the Clean Water Act, and it will ensure polluters who knowingly threaten our waters can be held accountable.”
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Online Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 52,011
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
Re: President Obama asserts power over small waterways
« Reply #2 on: May 27, 2015, 04:19:53 pm »
Quote
GOP vows fight against Obama’s ‘power grab’ water rule

Yeah! Sure!!!
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien

Offline andy58-in-nh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,779
  • Gender: Male
Re: President Obama asserts power over small waterways
« Reply #3 on: May 27, 2015, 06:29:22 pm »
I believe that Obama's abuse of Executive actions in expanding the authority of agency regulatory powers has effectively created a super-legislature within the Executive branch.
 
By now-accepted practice, the Chief Executive can now empower Federal agencies to make law, especially those favorable to his political party. Congress can legislate in opposition or amendment to these new regulations, but only if a sufficent number of members of the President's party agree. The only political remedy our Constitution provides Congress is impeachment, which, for well-established reasons is completely off the table.
 
Even then, the President can simply veto Congressional laws, with little politically-realistic threat of an override. His "laws" will remain intact, then unless the Federal courts can be made to enjoin them - and the President appoints its judges.
 
And even if persuaded to act, judicial argumentation and consideration can take months if not years, by which time the damage is done.
 
And so: our Executive branch is out of control, our Legislature is unable to restrain it, the Judiciary is undependable.
 
Hmmm. What to do? What to do?
"The most terrifying force of death, comes from the hands of Men who wanted to be left Alone. They try, so very hard, to mind their own business and provide for themselves and those they love. They resist every impulse to fight back, knowing the forced and permanent change of life that will come from it. They know, that the moment they fight back, their lives as they have lived them, are over. -Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,862
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Re: President Obama asserts power over small waterways
« Reply #4 on: May 28, 2015, 01:01:00 am »
What to do?