Author Topic: The RNC Should Ban George Stephanopoulos From Participating In 2016 Debates  (Read 807 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 386,125
  • Let's Go Brandon!
http://thefederalist.com/2015/05/14/the-rnc-should-ban-george-stephanopoulos-from-participating-in-2016-debates/

 The RNC Should Ban George Stephanopoulos From Participating In 2016 Debates
May 14, 2015 By Sean Davis

After being questioned by the Washington Free Beacon about large donations he made to the Clinton Foundation, George Stephanopoulos of ABC News disclosed to Politico that he had funneled $50,000 to the tax-exempt organization in 2013 and 2014. Stephanopoulos’s secret donations to the Clintons’ non-profit came while he was professionally covering the family for ABC News. And then, after he was busted by the Free Beacon, he decided to leak the news of his secret Clinton cash contributions to Politico in order to deny Free Beacon its scoop. Classy, huh?

It gets even worse, though. It wasn’t just that Stephanopoulos made the contributions while he was supposed to be objectively covering the Clinton family on behalf of a major broadcast news organization. It’s bigger than that. Just last month, Stephanopoulos interviewed Peter Schweizer, the author of Clinton Cash, a blockbuster investigative expose of the Clinton Foundation’s finances. Not once did Stephanopoulos disclose his cash ties to the Clinton Foundation. Stephanopoulos, who we are supposed to believe is an objective journalist, deliberately chose to hide the fact that he was a Clinton Foundation donor.

continued
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline Millee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,081
  • Gender: Female
That would involve the RNC growing a spine.   :whistle:

Offline flowers

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,798
That would involve the RNC growing a spine.   :whistle:
Yes it would...... :laugh:  that isn't going to happen anytime in the next 19 months.


Offline GourmetDan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,277
 
The RNC doesn't exist to help elect conservatives.

The RNC exists to give the impression of trying to help elect Republicans who are not offensive to Demonrats...

"The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left." - Ecclesiastes 10:2

"The sole purpose of the Republican Party is to serve as an ineffective alternative to the Democrat Party." - GourmetDan

Online DCPatriot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46,470
  • Gender: Male
  • "...and the winning number is...not yours!
...at a minimum.    :whistle:
"It aint what you don't know that kills you.  It's what you know that aint so!" ...Theodore Sturgeon

"Journalism is about covering the news.  With a pillow.  Until it stops moving."    - David Burge (Iowahawk)

"It was only a sunny smile, and little it cost in the giving, but like morning light it scattered the night and made the day worth living" F. Scott Fitzgerald

Offline Relic

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,967
  • Gender: Male

The RNC doesn't exist to help elect conservatives.

The RNC exists to give the impression of trying to help elect Republicans who are not offensive to Demonrats...

:thumbsup:

Online Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,932
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
GourmetDan wrote above:
[[ The RNC doesn't exist to help elect conservatives.
The RNC exists to give the impression of trying to help elect Republicans who are not offensive to Demonrats...]]


POW! Right in the kisser!

Good on ya, Dan!