John Bolton: Terrorists 'think they're Islamic'
'In Muslim world, there's no misunderstanding of what nature of this threat is'
Published: 02/18/2015 at 9:45 PM
www.wnd.com/files/2015/02/ISIS8.jpgISIS8
Attorney General Eric Holder says defining the largest terrorist threat to the U.S. and the West as Islamic extremism is insignificant compared to what the U.S. is doing about it. State Department Spokeswoman Marie Harf is doubling down on her contention that poverty is the greatest trigger violent extremism, and former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton says both comments only sow confusion and weaken the effort to destroy America’s enemies.
On Tuesday, as the Obama administration kicked off a three-day summit on combating violent extremism, Holder spoke at the National Press Club. One of the questions following his speech asked the attorney general to explain why the administration was reluctant to refer to the motivation of ISIS as radical Islam or Islamic extremism.
“I’m not sure an awful lot is gained by saying that,” Holder said. “It doesn’t have any impact on our military posture. I don’t worry an awful lot about what the appropriate terminology ought to be. I think people need to think about that. Really? We’re having this conversation about words as opposed to what our actions ought to be?”
Bolton said that line of thinking comes as no surprise.
“I think it reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of the threat that we face, but it’s been a misunderstanding that they’ve had for six straight years,” Bolton said. “The president said back in the 2008 campaign that he considered terrorism to be a law enforcement matter, something we could handle by arresting terrorists and trying them in federal court.”
While he believes Holder and Obama think they’re helping their cause by supposedly respecting Muslim sensibilities, Bolton said they’re really just guaranteeing that terrorist threats will get stronger.
“[Obama] doesn’t treat it as a war,” he said. “He doesn’t want to acknowledge that the threat is much graver than sort of robbing the local drug store, except a little bit more serious. I think this whole approach guarantees, in effect, that the terrorist threat will continue to be with us for a long time and even grow. They’re the ones that are waging the war. They know what they are. They think they’re Islamic.”
Listen to the WND/Radio America interview with John Bolton:
Furthermore, Bolton said the Obama refusal to get specific hurts non-radical Muslims the most.
“The people who are the most significant victims of this kind of terrorism have been other Muslims,” he said. “It really is hiding your head in the sand to think that by avoiding calling it Islamist radicalism or whatever term you like, but by simply using euphemisms, that somehow that’s going to make a difference.”
He said last week’s U.S. evacuation of Yemen is a perfect example of the inevitable consequence of weak U.S. action at a time of crisis.
“It’s a symbol of the decline of American influence, of the country spinning out of control, of both the Houthis and [Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula] now having Yemen as a base of operations,” Bolton said. “It’s a reflection of the failure of the whole Obama administration terrorist strategy. What he once called an example of the success of his strategy has turned into a debacle.”
Read “ISIS Rising: Prelude to a neo-Ottoman Caliphate” to find out what the terror camp leaders really want to do.
But how would clearer terminology make a difference? How would labeling terrorists as Islamic radicals hasten their destruction?
Bolton said it would make two big differences. The first is on the international stage.
“I think you can help build international coalitions more readily if people understand what they’re facing,” he said. “I don’t think in the Arab or the larger Muslim world there’s any misunderstanding of what the nature of this threat is. In a way, it’s patronizing to Muslims to act as though they are somehow completely homogeneous in their thinking that they’ll be insulted by describing this threat for what it is.”
The former U.N. ambassador also said clarity helps to galvanize Americans toward a common goal.
“I think it’s also important domestically so that Americans understand we’re not opposing an abstraction known as terrorism, nor are we opposing terrorism in every single manifestation,” he said. “We don’t care about what’s left of Irish Republican Army terrorism. We’re not concerned about the Basque separatists in Spain and France. The terrorist threat that the U.S. and the West as a whole face is very specific, and if you can’t describe it, people can’t get their arms around the steps that will be necessary to eliminate that threat.”
Holder’s comments came just one day after State Department Spokeswoman Marie Harf told MSNBC’s Chris Matthews that addressing poverty was a larger goal than killing terrorists.
“We cannot win this war by killing them,” Harf said. “We cannot kill our way out of this war. We need, in the medium and longer term, to go after the root causes that lead people to join these groups, whether it’s lack of opportunity for jobs. We can work with countries around the world to help improve their governance. We can help them build their economies, so they can have job opportunities for these people.”
Bolton rips Harf’s assessment as a juvenile perspective on how the world operates.
“This is embarrassing. It’s so ridiculous, but it reflects the ideology of the left, what Karl Marx called economic determinism, that everything in the world is caused by economics,” he said. “Politics, religion, as Marx called it were simply the superstructures of economics. Today’s leftists believe that every problem in the world is caused by poverty. So this child is out there saying if these guys had jobs, they wouldn’t pick up AK-47s.”
He says facts and history prove Harf to be very wrong.
“I think that utterly ignores the roles of ideology in politics and world affairs,” he said. “Osama bin Laden didn’t lack for job opportunities, nor do many of these other terrorists. If poverty were the source of terrorism, Haiti would be one of the most terrorist countries in the world. It’s so simple-minded that you’d think that nobody would pay attention to it. In fact, you’d think nobody would say such foolish things, but so much for our educational system.”
On Tuesday, Harf suggested her comments were too nuanced for her critics to understand. She also offered quotations from former Secretary of State Colin Powell and former President George W. Bush suggesting that reducing poverty also reduces the allure of terrorist activity. Bolton is still not buying it.
“I haven’t seen the exact quotes she’s using, and I don’t doubt that you can take remarks out of context in a way that makes it look like it supports her position,” he said. “But she could have Mother Teresa on her side, and it still wouldn’t reflect reality,” he said.
As for actually solving the ISIS problem, Bolton said the solution is pretty clear.
“The way you eliminate the threat is to go after the territory they control, not just by sporadic, pinprick bombing raids but by forging a coalition and using effective military force,” he said. “I think we’re blinking at reality if we don’t see that that’s ultimately what we need to do.”
Last week, Obama submitted his request for Congress to approve a three-year authorization for the use of military force, or AUMF. Bolton said that request is not serious, but a robust AUMF would be very helpful.
“I would vote against his text. I think you’ve got authority under the Constitution and under the 2002 resolution that granted President Bush authority to use military force,” Bolton said. “The only thing that is required is a one-sentence resolution that says the president is authorized to use all necessary means to destroy ISIS and all its affiliates. If you went with that, that would be perfectly satisfactory.”
Read more at
http://www.wnd.com/2015/02/john-bolton-terrorists-think-theyre-islamic/#VKLFgOVcKbSDsDM1.99
