Author Topic: Hillary Clinton's ties to corporate donors, lobbyists while secretary of state scrutinized  (Read 291 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 386,155
  • Let's Go Brandon!
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/02/20/hillary-clinton-ties-to-corporate-donors-lobbyists-while-secretary-state/

Hillary Clinton's ties to corporate donors, lobbyists while secretary of state scrutinized
Published February 20, 2015
FoxNews.com

Hillary Clinton's ties to large corporations have come under more scrutiny after it was revealed that dozens of companies that have donated millions to her family's foundation also lobbied the State Department during her tenure as secretary of state.

The Wall Street Journal reports that the 60 companies who lobbied Clinton's State Department between 2009 and 2013 donated over $26 million to the Clinton Foundation in that period. The donors include instantly recognizable names like General Electric, Exxon Mobil, and Boeing.

The Journal also reports that at least 44 of the 60 companies participated in philanthropy projects valued at $3.2 billion set up by the Clinton Global Initiative, which is a wing of the foundation. At least 25 of the companies also contributed to 15 public-private partnerships created by Clinton and coordinated by the State Department.

While there is no evidence that any laws were broken, the connections do raise potentially thorny ethical questions as Clinton prepares for a likely 2016 run for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill told the Journal that she "did the job that every secretary of state is supposed to do and what the American people expect of them—especially during difficult economic times. She proudly and loudly advocated on behalf of American business and took every opportunity she could to promote U.S. commercial interests abroad."

The latest report comes on the heels of the disclosure that donations from foreign governments to the Clinton Foundation have increased considerably following the removal of a self-imposed ban on such contributions during Hillary's time as Secretary of State. Experts have said that the donation ban should be immediately re-imposed until Clinton formally decides one way or another whether she will seek the White House. On Thursday, the foundation said it would consider whether to accept such contributions should Clinton decide to run, but would not commit to rejecting such donations in the future.

The Journal report cites several examples of Clinton promoting eventual donors to the Foundation and its various activities. For example, in October 2012, she lobbied the Algerian government to contract General Electric to build power plants in that country. The following month, the Foundation approached the company about expanding a health-access initiative. An eventual partnership was formed, to which the company contributed between $500,000 and $1 million. The Algerian government awarded GE the power plant contract in September 2013.

Other efforts were less successful. In 2010, Clinton announced cooperation between the U.S. and Poland on a scheme to develop shale gas deposits in eastern Europe. After several years of false starts, Exxon Mobil and Chevron gave up their Polish plans.

In 2012, Clinton persuaded Bulgaria's government to issue a five-year license to Chevron allowing conventional gas exploration. That, too went nowhere. The following year, the Journal reports, Chevron donated $250,000 to the foundation. Exxon Mobil, for its part, has donated at least $18.8 million to various initiatives, including a nonprofit women's group called vital voices.

In at least one case, a sizable corporate monetary promise was made before a Clinton overseas trip. In 2012, Wal-Mart, a company with whom the Clintons have ties going back to their days in Arkansas, pledged $12 million to various causes supporting woman in Latin America. $1.5 million of that money went toward a Clinton Foundation public-private partnership and another $500,000 went to Vital Voices.

A month later, Clinton lobbied the Indian government to reverse a ban on multibrand retailers, opening up a potentially lucrative market for several U.S. companies, including Wal-Mart. The effort was unsuccessful.
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Online mountaineer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 79,945
Friends of the Clintons
By Post Editorial Board
February 18, 2015 | 7:38pm

In a front-page story on the Clinton Foundation back in 2013, The New York Times noted “how difficult it can be to disentangle the Clintons’ charity work from Mr. Clinton’s moneymaking ventures and Mrs. Clinton’s political future.”

This week, The Wall Street Journal offered yet another complicating factor: Without any public announcement, the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation has resumed accepting large donations from foreign governments.

This was a practice it had dropped to avoid obvious conflicts of interest when Mrs. Clinton became secretary of state — at the insistence of the Obama White House.

Among the new and returning donors are the governments of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Oman, as well as of Germany, Norway, Italy and the Netherlands.

Estimates are that the foundation — on whose board Hillary serves — has raised at least $48 million from foreign governments since its founding.

Bad enough that nonprofits increasingly allow pols to insulate income from taxation by funneling it through a nonprofit, which can then pick up expenses for travel and such.

Worse is if it allows candidates to make an end-run around laws aimed at limiting foreign influence on our elections.

Foreign governments have an obvious stake in trying to use their money to curry favor with someone who might become president. American law prohibits foreigners and foreign governments from contributing to candidates. But not to foundations.

The Clinton Foundation insists the cash goes to worthy causes and it has a tough vetting process. But there’s a reason the White House insisted the foundation stop accepting foreign donations when Hillary was serving as secretary of state.

Which is even more important if she’s running for president.
Support Israel's emergency medical service. afmda.org