Author Topic: Obama prepares to veto Keystone … in private  (Read 702 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 386,154
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Obama prepares to veto Keystone … in private
« on: February 09, 2015, 08:41:43 pm »
http://hotair.com/archives/2015/02/09/video-obama-prepares-to-veto-keystone-in-private/

Video: Obama prepares to veto Keystone … in private
posted at 12:01 pm on February 9, 2015 by Ed Morrissey

 

He’s got a phone and a pen, and … an office door that can stay closed, too. The Hill reports that Barack Obama has begun preparing to veto the bill forcing approval of the Keystone XL pipeline, which may be a delicate task — since so many Democrats actually voted for and favor the project. Obama has spent months bragging about his pen and phone and has issued a number of veto threats publicly since the November elections that gave Republicans full control of Congress. However, this veto won’t include photo ops:

Quote
    President Obama is just days away from issuing the biggest veto of his tenure, with Republicans poised to send him legislation that would authorize construction of the Keystone XL pipeline.

    Obama’s veto — just the third of his presidency and the first since 2010 — is expected to come with little fanfare, with even opponents of the pipeline arguing the White House should avoid further angering Democrats and unions who want Keystone to be built. …

    But not all vetoes have been performed so publicly.

    When Clinton vetoed the legislation banning partial birth abortions, he did so in a private ceremony in the Oval Office. He met with women who had undergone the procedure on the advice of their doctors because their health was in danger.

    Often presidents have vetoed bills simply by issuing a written statement outlining their objections.

    That’s the route Obama is likely to take on Keystone, given how deeply the legislation divides his own party.

This provides the first look at what will be a two-year problem for Obama. Without Harry Reid blocking GOP initiatives in the Senate, Obama now has to issue vetoes rather than maintain the pretense of being above the politics of legislating. Vetoes on partisan projects (like the repeal of ObamaCare) will help him look like a steadfast executive, but vetoing legislation that gets significant Democratic support will make him look like the extremist in question — in this case, a tool in the hands of environmentalists.

Unfortunately for Democrats, it also paints them in the same light, especially if they can’t overturn a veto on a bipartisan initiative like Keystone that enjoys so much broad popularity in the electorate. Salena Zito observed over the weekend that the pro-life faction of the Democratic Party has disappeared, and voters have begun to conclude that Democrats have left the center in favor of extremist activists:

Quote
    Just five years ago, 110 pro-life Democrats were in the House, around a dozen in the U.S. Senate. Today, fewer than five are in the House, and two in the Senate.

    Just five years ago, coincidentally, Democrats held majorities in both chambers.

    They lost those majorities because they lost touch with their districts.

    Yes, gerrymandering played a part. Yet that is far from the whole story, a story no one talks about — or, if they do, they don’t address the problem. The fact is, Democrats are losing or excluding evangelicals, blue-collar types, Jacksonians and moderates, not only from feeling welcome in the party but from filling the Democrat bench to run for or to hold local offices.

    That is happening not just in Ohio but all across the country.

Obama can’t hide that behind a closed door. Democrats should be thinking about how to turn that ship around, rather than to keep sailing to the edges of the political world.
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Online Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,941
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Re: Obama prepares to veto Keystone … in private
« Reply #1 on: February 10, 2015, 04:48:32 am »
I've posted it numerous times before and will repeat:

Keystone is a dead issue until January 2017.

Until then, keep those tank cars rollin'!

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Re: Obama prepares to veto Keystone … in private
« Reply #2 on: February 10, 2015, 12:36:48 pm »

 

Obama Will Veto Keystone XL Behind Closed Doors

By Emily Zanotti on 2.9.15 | 3:38PM


The President will veto a bill authorizing construction of the Keystone XL pipeline this week, despite the bill's bipartisan support. But instead of making a big deal out of the "do nothing Congress" he's seen so far as his foe (Obama's only had the chance to veto three bills in his Presidency, largely due to partisan deadlock in the legislature), Obama will stamp this one out quietly, behind closed doors at his desk, without any media fanfare.

Because, as it turns out, the man who has spent the better part of four years accusing the Republicans of being the blockade against effective legislation is about to undertake a two-year crusade against anything passed by Congress, and he doesn't want anyone to know about it.


Obama’s veto — just the third of his presidency and the first since 2010 — is expected to come with little fanfare, with even opponents of the pipeline arguing the White House should avoid further angering Democrats and unions who want Keystone to be built.

"We just want to see it get it rejected. Our work doesn't end with the veto, we need to make sure votes are there to sustain that veto," said Melinda Pierce, Sierra Club's legislative director.

Republicans are eagerly awaiting Obama’s stroke of the pen, believing every veto he makes will help them make the case that job-creating legislation is being blocked by a president of “no.”

"This is the first piece of legislation on his desk . . . and he will have to choose between hard working Americans and taxpayers or environmental extremists,” said Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), a staunch Keystone supporter.

Even if you aren't interested in the mechanics of transporting oil across America's heartland, or are confused on the details of who gets to build Keystone and where, this bill has a deeper meaning for the Democrats' coalition going into 2016. While it's easy to see why the President would veto that impacts something the Democrats as a whole find to be a core belief of the party - say, abortion restrictions - the Keystone XL pipeline actually has an impact on several small Democratic coaltions. Heartland Democratic legislators want the economic boost that comes with a massive infrastructure project. Typically-Democratic labor unions are very interested in the possibility of hundreds, if not thousands, of union jobs. And moderate Democrats from industrial states across the country are joining Republicans to vote for the project. Vetoing the pipeline affords greater consideration to more typically "fringe" Democratic constituencies, like radical environmentalists, and demonstrates where the party thinks it needs to go to attract loyal voters in time for 2016.

This, of course, leaves blue-collar industrial workers, who are mostly middle-class, open to Republican marketing, provided they're paying attention to legislative minutae. And that's why Obama will take this veto behind closed doors. What you don't see happen never happened.
 
The American Spectator Foundation is the 501(c)(3) organization responsible for publishing The American Spectator magazine and training aspiring journalists who espouse traditional American values. Your contributions are tax deductible to the extent permitted by law. Each donor receives a year-end summary of their giving for tax purposes.

Copyright 2013, The American Spectator. All rights reserved.


Source URL: http://spectator.org/blog/61739/obama-will-veto-keystone-xl-behind-closed-doors