Author Topic: How many Senators will retire in 2016?  (Read 640 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 384,560
  • Let's Go Brandon!
How many Senators will retire in 2016?
« on: February 09, 2015, 04:46:58 pm »
http://www.redstate.com/2015/02/07/many-senators-will-retire-2016/?utm_source=rsfbp&utm_medium=fbpage&utm_campaign=rsupdate

How many Senators will retire in 2016?
By: Moe Lane (Diary)  |  February 7th, 2015 at 10:00 PM  |

Possibly not that many: “Of the 34 senators facing re-election next year, just one has announced retirement. A CQ Roll Call survey of the entire Senate class showed only one more senator publicly undecided about re-election, plus three additional senators considering bids for other offices. Two more Senate offices did not return requests for comment on re-election plans, though Democrats are near certain one of them — Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR)3%, D-Ore., will seek another term.” The retiree is, of course, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA)0% of California. The three thinking of running for other offices are Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY)93% (Kentucky), Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL)82% (Florida), and Sen. David Vitter (R-LA)70% (Louisiana); the undecided is Dan Coats of Indiana.

The wildcards right now are Barbara Mikulski of Maryland and Harry Reid of Nevada; Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD)0% is 78, while Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV)10% is both 75 and still recovering from a disastrous injury. On the other hand, Senators are expected to be old more or less by default; that is, in fact, what their title means. On the gripping hand? One wonders just how much fun Democratic Senators will find the next Congress. While the path to a Democratic majority in the Senate might be clearer than the one for getting in the House, that path is not actually ‘clear.’ Or really plausible, at this moment in time. Some Democratic Senators might not be burned out enough yet (Murray, Schatz, Wyden), or are too worried about getting reelected (Bennett), or have other things to enrich occupy themselves (Blumenthal, Schumer), or simply may just not have anywhere else to go (Leahy). But it is a little surprising that Barbara Mikulski hasn’t committed to running for re-election yet.  Keep track of that one*…

Moe Lane

*Admittedly, the chances of us picking up a Senate seat in Maryland if Mikulski retires is as about as likely as, shoot, winning the Maryland Governor’s race against an African-American incumbent Lt. Governor OH WAIT.
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline speekinout

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,329
Re: How many Senators will retire in 2016?
« Reply #1 on: February 10, 2015, 12:24:44 am »
Quote
*Admittedly, the chances of us picking up a Senate seat in Maryland if Mikulski retires is as about as likely as, shoot, winning the Maryland Governor’s race against an African-American incumbent Lt. Governor OH WAIT.

MD does not have a deep bench of GOPers waiting to run for office. They might not even have a chair full.  **nononono* It's hard to imagine someone winning a Senate seat without having previously held some state office. I don't think anyone would spend money on such a long shot, but maybe there's someone rich who could finance their own campaign.
I'm not going to bet on MD for any GOP gains.