Author Topic: Siding with President Obama, FCC to push 'strongest ever' Internet rules  (Read 564 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,274
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
http://thehill.com/policy/technology/231701-fcc-to-push-strongest-open-internet-protections-ever

By Julian Hattem - 02/04/15 11:12 AM EST
Federal regulators will follow President Obama’s call and reclassify Internet service so that it can be regulated like a utility, the head of the Federal Communications Commission said on Wednesday.

Chairman Tom Wheeler announced he will embrace the controversial approach to the regulations, ending months of speculation about the FCC’s plans.

The new rules that he will circulate to his four fellow commissioners this week are the “strongest open Internet protections ever proposed by the FCC,” Wheeler said in an op-ed in Wired.

The “enforceable, bright-line rules” will ban Internet service providers such as Comcast or Verizon from blocking or slowing people’s access to content online. They will also ban “fast lane” deals that the companies could make with websites to speed up particular services, and extend the rules to Internet accessed through people’s cellphones and tablets for the first time.
“My proposal assures the rights of Internet users to go where they want, when they want, and the rights of innovators to introduce new products without asking anyone’s permission,” Wheeler wrote.

The White House said Wednesday it was "certainly encouraged" to see Wheeler's proposal, and that they believed the plan was "consistent with the view the president articulated" last fall.

Press secretary Josh Earnest said the White House would "withhold a detailed comment about their proposal out of respect" for the independent process.

Broadband Internet service is now classified as an “information” service under the FCC’s rules, which allows it to escape some types of regulation that are applied to “telecommunications” services such as wired phone lines. But Web activists have for years questioned that categorization, and said that people’s increasing dependence on an open and free Internet should prompt the FCC to change course.

Those calls were amplified after a federal appeals court tossed out previous net neutrality rules last year, and in the wake of an initial FCC proposal that opponents said would have allowed companies to negotiate to create “fast lanes” on the Internet.

Nearly 4 million public comments came in to the FCC after those initial rules last spring, many of them urging the commission to act more aggressively.

The strongest push for tougher rules came from Obama, who shortly after the midterm elections issued a video statement calling for the FCC to apply utility-style rules under Title II of the Communications Act.

Though Wheeler has said he had already been examining the legal authority before Obama’s statement, the White House’s move seems to have ratcheted up the pressure for him to act.

“The Internet must be fast, fair and open,” Wheeler wrote on Wednesday, while harkening back to his past as a venture capitalist and head of a tech startup. “That is the message I’ve heard from consumers and innovators across this nation.”

“The proposal I present to the commission will ensure the Internet remains open, now and in the future, for all Americans,” he added.

The move faces opposition from Republicans, both on Capitol Hill and within the FCC.


While Wheeler should be able to pass the rules with the backing of his two fellow Democrats on the five-member commission, the two GOP members are assured to vote against any proposal that reclassifies the Web. 

In Congress, Republicans have raced to write new legislation that would enshrine in law some net neutrality protections — such as a ban on blocking, slowing or speeding up people’s access to particular websites – but would ban the FCC from treating the Web like a utility, among other new restrictions. Democrats have so far balked at the measure, and a deal seems unlikely until at least until after the FCC votes on the rules on Feb. 26.

Many Republicans have worried about any government oversight of the Web, and have raised especially vocal concerns that it would be reclassified, which they say would enact outdated regulatory tools to the Internet of the 21st Century.

Wheeler promised that his new draft rules — the text of which will likely not become public for another three weeks — “will be strong enough and flexible enough not only to deal with the realities of today, but also to establish ground rules for the as yet unimagined.”

The proposal will “modernize” the law, Wheeler wrote, “tailoring it for the 21st century, in order to provide returns necessary to construct competitive networks.” For instance, the new rules will decline to regulate rates, impose tariffs or take some other aggressive regulatory steps that critics have worried about, and will not lead to any new fees or taxes, FCC officials said.

The new rules will for the first time apply to wireless service, allow the FCC to investigate back-end deals that companies make to hand off Web traffic from one provider to another, and “take appropriate enforcement action” against any actions that are “not just and reasonable,” the FCC said in a fact sheet about the rules.

Major Internet service providers have pledged a lawsuit over the looming rules, setting up a court battle that could last for years. Wheeler has acknowledged those anticipated lawsuits in recent weeks, and has said that his new rules are designed to withstand them.

Democrats and Web activists who have pushed for strong rules were ecstatic at Wednesday’s announcement.

“The proposed update to net neutrality rules is a triumph for the American consumer,” Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.), the top Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on Communications, said in a statement. “This is the architecture of our digital future.”

“All indications point to this announcement as reassuring for the future of the Internet, free speech and American innovation,” added David Segal, the head of the Web activist group Demand Progress, “because Title II is the simplest, most legally sound way to preserve net neutrality.”

This story was last updated at 2:21 p.m.
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,274
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Re: Siding with President Obama, FCC to push 'strongest ever' Internet rules
« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2015, 08:37:49 pm »
http://thehill.com/policy/technology/231720-dems-rush-to-applaud-fcc-internet-rules

Dems rush to applaud FCC Internet rules
218
  32
By Mario Trujillo - 02/04/15 12:36 PM EST
Democrats on Capitol Hill swiftly applauded Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Tom Wheeler for drafting what he described as "the strongest open Internet protections ever proposed."

Multiple Democrats and outside advocates issued laudatory statements Wednesday minutes after Wheeler's op-ed in Wired went live announcing a proposal to reclassify the Internet as a public utility and enforce strict net neutrality rules.

Rep. Anna Eshoo (Calif), ranking Democrat on the House Commerce Subcommittee on Technology and Communications said the rules are a "triumph for the American consumer."

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) called the rules a "victory for the Internet," while Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) pushed the entire FCC to "adopt this proposal and ensure that monopolies are never allowed to slam the door on American innovation.”
The commission, made up of three Democrats and two Republicans, is expected to vote on the proposal Feb. 26. Observers predict a 3-2 vote, as both Republicans have previously expressed objections to the stronger rules.

Wheeler on Wednesday announced what many had expected for weeks — that he would propose reclassifying the Internet under Title II of the Communications Act. The rules, which would apply to mobile and fixed broadband, are meant to prevent Internet providers from slowing or blocking traffic to any website.

The rules would also prevent companies from negotiating deals for faster service in exchange for a fee.

Rep. Doris Matsui (D-Calif.) noted the "U-Turn" the commission made since releasing a draft proposal last year. Advocates were initially upset with the draft, which recommended using an alternate authority that would have allowed "commercially reasonable" fast-lane deals.

Wheeler announced he is also proposing a "general conduct rule" to give the FCC authority to prevent future threats to the Internet.

The left-leaning consumer advocacy group Public Knowledge said Wheeler did not make the choice lightly, applauding him for adapting to public concerns. But the group said it would need to see the text of the order, which is not expected to be released until after a vote.

“Of course we look forward to seeing the actual language of the rules before fully evaluating their strength and impact, but we are very encouraged by the Chairman’s announcement today," said Chris Lewis, the group's head of government affairs.

Republicans and service providers like Comcast and Verizon, who have argued against the proposal, were slower out with reaction.

House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) cautioned the FCC has overstepped "to rewrite" communications law, which he said is the task of Congress. He urged the FCC to use antitrust laws to enforce net neutrality principles.

"Wheeler’s approach would squelch investment in one of the most dynamic and competitive marketplaces in history and lock net neutrality protection in the courts without reaching Americans now or anytime in the near future," he said in a statement.

The office of Senate Commerce Committee Chairman John Thune (R-S.D.) highlighted his comments from a day earlier, that the rules would surely be challenged in court.

"If the FCC goes down this path, it gets challenged, it ends up in court [and] it chills investment," Thune told USA Today. "So it not only hurts innovation and investment ... but it also clouds the picture for the future."

Those concerns were echoed by others.

"It is unfortunate to see the Commission forging ahead with an Order so fraught with legal challenges and political opposition while Congress is actively looking for a compromise that will put open Internet regulations on firm footing," the Information Technology & Innovation Foundation said in a statement, relating the rules to "European-style" regulations.
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Online kevindavis007

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,416
  • Gender: Male
Re: Siding with President Obama, FCC to push 'strongest ever' Internet rules
« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2015, 11:25:55 pm »
Why do I have a bad feeling about this..
Join The Reagan Caucus: https://reagancaucus.org/

Offline Free Vulcan

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,762
  • Gender: Male
  • Ah, the air is so much fresher here...
Re: Siding with President Obama, FCC to push 'strongest ever' Internet rules
« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2015, 11:27:35 am »
Bottom line is they'll make it appear more open on it's face, but will consolidate backdoor control, which they will use to shut down conservatives' political speech.
The Republic is lost.