Author Topic: Britain: WHAT LANDSLIDE? Obama threatens vetoes and executive orders – including immigration reform THIS YEAR – after Americans reject him by giving Republicans historic gains in Congress  (Read 523 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
 
WHAT LANDSLIDE? Obama threatens vetoes and executive orders – including immigration reform THIS YEAR – after Americans reject him by giving Republicans historic gains in Congress
– after Americans reject him by giving Republicans historic gains in Congress
'Congress will pass some bills I cannot sign,' the president warned
He has only vetoed  two minor bills since his inauguration in 2009
And 'I'll take some actions that some in Congress will not like,' Obama added, referring to threatened executive orders
Those include a bold move on immigration 'before the end of the year'
President sounded more like a winner than a loser despite his policies being repudiated on a national scale
Never articulated a single policy where he would shift his position to align with GOP majorities in both houses of Congress

By David Martosko, Us Political Editor for MailOnline
 
 

President Barack Obama came out swinging on Wednesday just 14 hours after a Republican wave swept over the U.S. Congress in an election that largely repudiated his policies.

'Congress will pass some bills I cannot sign,' he said, threatening to dust off a veto pen that he has used only twice in nearly six years.

And he hinted at executive orders that will enrage conservatives.

'I'm pretty sure I'll take some actions that some in Congress will not like,' he said. 'That's natural. That's how Democracy works.'

Much of reporters' tussling with the president focused on executive orders related to immigration reform – what some tea party Republicans call an 'amnesty' – which he plans to implement this year.

He acknowledged that the GOP won Tuesday's elections, but framed the results as a mandate for Republicans to work with him, instead of the other way around.

'Obviously the Republicans had a good night,' he said.

 
But he said he would principally work with them 'if there are ideas that the Republicans have that I am confident will make things better for ordinary Americans.'

'I want to just see what works,' he said.



'The American people sent a message,' he claimed, 'one that they've sent for several elections now.'

'They expect the people they elect to work as hard as they do. They expect us to focus on their ambitions, and not ours.'

He then rattled off a list of economic indicators that he said buttressed his case that Republicans should accept his point of view.

'More Americans are working. Unemployment has come down,' he claimed, glossing over the part-time employment shift that the Obamacare law's employer mandate has ushered in.

 

'Our economy is outpacing most of the world. But we've just gotta keep at it. Much of that will take action from Congress. And I'm eager to work with the next Congress.'

He cited infrastructure building projects and international trade as areas where he thought his agenda overlaps with the GOP's.

Responding to hot-button questions about the fate of Obamacare in the age of a Republican Congress, the president didn't budge.

He said he would only work with Republicans if they seek to 'make responsible changes' to the law. 'I'm going to be very receptive to hearing those ideas.'

'Despite all the contention,' Obama claimed, 'we now know that the law works.'

And he pledged to avoid last year's chronic website snafus the next time around.

'We're really making sure the website works super well before the next open enrollment period,' he said. 'We're double- and triple'checking it.'

Addressing his relationship with the new Senate majority leader, Obama chuckled at a question about whether he might sit down with him for a drink.

'I would enjoy having some Kentucky bourbon with Mitch McConnell,' the president said.

'He has always been very straightforward with me. To his credit, he has never made a promise that he couldn't deliver. And he knows the legislative process well. He obviously know his caucus well.'

More

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2822484/WHAT-LANDSLIDE-Obama-threatens-vetoes-executive-orders-Americans-reject-giving-Republicans-historic-gains-Congress.html#ixzz3IFRqNV1d
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

SPQR

  • Guest
Congress may attempt to overturn an executive order by passing legislation (a bill) that opposes the order. However, the President can veto that bill, and Congress would then need to override that veto to pass the bill. Also, the Supreme Court can declare an executive order to be unconstitutional.


SPQR

  • Guest
Congress may attempt to overturn an executive order by passing legislation (a bill) that opposes the order. However, the President can veto that bill, and Congress would then need to override that veto to pass the bill. Also, the Supreme Court can declare an executive order to be unconstitutional.

My best bet would be the Supreme Court. Embarrass him there.

Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 80,409
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

SPQR

  • Guest
"Embarrass?"   :silly:  :mauslaff: 000hehehehe :laughingdog: :bigsilly:

I think that he needs a good rebuke from the Supreme Court. A string of 5-4 or 6-3 losing high profile cases should do the job
« Last Edit: November 06, 2014, 06:23:33 am by Trigger »

rangerrebew

  • Guest
  Also, the Supreme Court can declare an executive order to be unconstitutional.

Operative word - can.  Likely word - won't.  As long as senorita Sotomayor is on the court there will at least one vote in favor of Obama on everything; she doesn't believe in the Constitution.  Kagan and Ginsberg most likely would support anything he does as they don't believe in the Constitution either.  Two more votes and presto, Obama the dictator.
« Last Edit: November 06, 2014, 02:59:43 pm by rangerrebew »

Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 80,409
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Operative word - can.  Likely word - won't.  As long as senorita Sotomayor is on the court there will at least one vote in favor of Obama on everything; she doesn't believe in the Constitution.  Kagan and Ginsberg most likely would support anything he does as they don't believe in the Constitution either.  Two more votes and presto, Obama the dictator.

There will be embarrassment, but it won't be he who cannot be embarrassed.  The concept makes me giggle.
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed: