MSM: OBAMA EXEC AMNESTY WOULD BE 'FLIPPING THE COUNTRY THE BIRD'

[mystery-ak]

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/11/05/MSM-Obama-Exec-Amnesty-Would-Be-Flipping-the-Country-The-Bird

by TONY LEE  5 Nov 2014, 9:19 AM PDT

Two card-carrying members of the permanent mainstream media class in D.C. had to concede on Tuesday that President Obama would be flipping off America if he enacts his planned executive amnesty after Democrats got shellacked in the midterms.
 
"After this repudiation, acting on #immigration by fiat would be the political equivalent of literally flipping the country the bird," the National Journal's Ron Fournier Tweeted.

NBC's Chuck Todd said he believed the midterm results "put an end" to Obama’s executive amnesty. He a Obama's executive amnesty would be a "provocative act politically," that would start "a political war in Washington between the White House and the Republican Congress."

Ron Fournier        ✔ @ron_fournier
Follow
After this repudiation, acting on #immigration by fiat would be the political equivalent of literally flipping the country the bird.
11:12 PM - 4 Nov 2014

The White House had insisted that Obama would defiantly enact his executive amnesty regardless of Tuesday night's election results.

[Fishrrman]

[[ The White House had insisted that Obama would defiantly enact his executive amnesty regardless of Tuesday night's election results. ]]

What's needed is for a newbie Republican representative (Mia Love comes to mind) to state that he/she will introduce an Article of Impeachment on the House floor if Obama insists on issuing such an edict.

Or perhaps someone already sitting to state that he/she is preparing such Articles RIGHT NOW, which will be introduced the day after the edict emanates from the White House.

Political theater?
Of course it is.

But perhaps only the threat of impeachment will stay Obama on this matter.

Aside:
It doesn't matter if the Articles would be voted on by the full house, nor if the Senate would convict.
What "matters" is the threat.
Make the threat plausible, and Hussein may back down...

[Bigun]

[[ The White House had insisted that Obama would defiantly enact his executive amnesty regardless of Tuesday night's election results. ]]

What's needed is for a newbie Republican representative (Mia Love comes to mind) to state that he/she will introduce an Article of Impeachment on the House floor if Obama insists on issuing such an edict.

Or perhaps someone already sitting to state that he/she is preparing such Articles RIGHT NOW, which will be introduced the day after the edict emanates from the White House.

Political theater?
Of course it is.

But perhaps only the threat of impeachment will stay Obama on this matter.

Aside:
It doesn't matter if the Articles would be voted on by the full house, nor if the Senate would convict.
What "matters" is the threat.
Make the threat plausible, and Hussein may back down...

It is entirely possible that Obama WANTS impeachment!  "Whitey impeached the first black president" and all that! He would absolutely LOVE that!