So If I understand, what you asked me for and what I quoted wasn't exactly what you meant? I suspect there was a reason you left your words out of my response. So now, at least we can agree that some gays can engage in monogamous relationships? That's a critical distinction from your earlier position. How many in your mind would it take to agree that maybe society should accept those same-sex relationships? I don't know the answer, but I do know that the history of hetero-marriage is far less of a long lasting, love-filled lifetime experience than we admit to.
Dan, I can't give you high marks for the argument, but you get an A+ for hanging in there! 
You need to take all comments made by a person in context and together to understand their argument.
Cherry-picking what you want out of their comments and insisting that defines the argument is well, the fallacy of cherry-picking.
And, I could say the same thing about your arguments and it would mean just as much...
