Author Topic: Chairman of the Joint Chiefs General Dempsey should resign By Thomas Lifson  (Read 343 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 386,110
  • Let's Go Brandon!
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/09/chairman_of_the_joint_chiefs_general_dempsey_should_resign.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=facebook

September 28, 2014
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs General Dempsey should resign
By Thomas Lifson


An extraordinary thing happened on Friday: America’s top military leader went public contradicting the Commander-in-Chief’s strategy for prosecuting the war with ISIS. As Geoff Earle of the New York Post reported:

Quote
As the massive US-led air campaign plows ahead, the nation’s top military chief says it will take 15,000 ground troops to wipe out[float=right][/float] ISIS in Syria.

Gen. Martin Dempsey, chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, made the statement at a Friday briefing as Britain, Belgium and Denmark joined the bombing campaign to wipe out the terror group in Iraq.

“The answer is yes. There has to be a ground component in the campaign,” Dempsey said, appearing alongside Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel.

“We need 12,000 to 15,000 to reclaim lost territory,” he said, referring to the huge swath ISIS carved out from Iraq and Syria.

In other words, the General believes that he is leading troops into a battle they cannot win – though they could do so with a better strategy.  This a situation in which a public resignation is called-for. Don’t take it on my authority, but rather consider the views of reited Marine Corps Colonel Gary Anderson, writing in Foreign Policy:

Quote
Without American combat troops on the ground to physically clear the cities and towns that the forces of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi have occupied, we are in for a long and frustrating open-ended conflict that the American people will quickly tire of. Dempsey is too good a tactician not to know differently; having served with him briefly on a fact-finding tour for the deputy secretary of defense in Iraq in 2003, I found him to be one of the best commanders in the field. If he slaps his four stars on the table and tells the president to find somebody else to pitch the next inning, it will make a real difference.

Col. Anderson puts the failure (so far) of General Dempsey to act on his views in sobering historical context:

Quote
In a telling study of the Vietnam War, H.R. McMaster, now an Army general officer himself, castigates the military general-officer class of that era for quietly carrying out orders that they knew to be wrong. In 2003, many generals strongly disagreed with President George W. Bush's decision to go to war with Iraq, but none resigned in protest.

Resignation in protest is an honorable tradition, and one that seems to have been forgotten in recent decades, and not just in the military.  It places duty above ambition, and in some cases, personal financial gain. General Dempsey has served this nation with great distinction for decades. Now he can cap his career with an important service, by letting the public and the Commander he serves know how grave the mistake is that he sees so clearly. He could revive a tradition that needs resucitation, as well.

Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline EdinVA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,584
  • Gender: Male
The general is following the script.  Leaking info by underlings to gauge reaction is the way we calm the conservatives by showing we "mean business" as well as the liberals with "see, not going to use a big army".

Besides, what would be accomplished by quitting?  BO would simply appoint another stooge.

Offline alicewonders

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,021
  • Gender: Female
  • Live life-it's too short to butt heads w buttheads
The general is following the script.  Leaking info by underlings to gauge reaction is the way we calm the conservatives by showing we "mean business" as well as the liberals with "see, not going to use a big army".

Besides, what would be accomplished by quitting?  BO would simply appoint another stooge.

I'm getting dizzy from all of the mis-directing and re-directing signals we're being bombarded with.  In terms of real information, it's a big bunch of nothing.  News nowadays is nothing but a big stalling tactic until we can re-direct the sheeple's attention to the next shiny object so that the powers-that-be can keep their powers.

Don't tread on me.   8888madkitty

We told you Trump would win - bigly!