Author Topic: LET THE BACKBITING BEGIN: Dems Begin To Devour Debbie  (Read 448 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
LET THE BACKBITING BEGIN: Dems Begin To Devour Debbie
« on: September 19, 2014, 10:53:45 am »
LET THE BACKBITING BEGIN: Dems Begin To Devour Debbie
 
Posted on September 18, 2014


It is in the character of the Democrats to self-preserve and blame others for their woes.  The new target of this ruthless party is Debbie Wasserman Shultz. Yes, an easy target indeed because there are so many reasons to distrust this woman who has her own interest at heart.  Let’s just hope she is so distracted by the disgruntled Dems and her reputation is so damaged that Joe Kaufman (R) of Florida’s 23rd district soundly defeats this dishonest diva.

By EDWARD-ISAAC DOVERE | 9/17/14 5:46 PM EDT  Updated: 9/18/14 11:22 AM EDT



Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz is in a behind-the-scenes struggle with the White House, congressional Democrats and Washington insiders who have lost confidence in her as both a unifying leader and reliable party spokesperson at a time when they need her most.

Long-simmering doubts about her have reached a peak after two recent public flubs: criticizing the White House’s handling of the border crisis and comparing the tea party to wife beaters.


The perception of critics is that Wasserman Schultz spends more energy tending to her own political ambitions than helping Democrats win. This includes using meetings with DNC donors to solicit contributions for her own PAC and campaign committee, traveling to uncompetitive districts to court House colleagues for her potential leadership bid and having DNC-paid staff focus on her personal political agenda.

She’s become a liability to the DNC, and even to her own prospects, critics say.

“I guess the best way to describe it is, it’s not that she’s losing a duel anywhere, it’s that she seems to keep shooting herself in the foot before she even gets the gun out of the holster,” said John Morgan, a major donor in Wasserman Schultz’s home state of Florida.

The stakes are high. Wasserman Schultz is a high-profile national figure who helped raise millions of dollars and served as a Democratic messenger to female voters during a presidential election in which Obama needed to exploit the gender gap to win, but November’s already difficult midterms are looming.

One example that sources point to as particularly troubling: Wasserman Schultz repeatedly trying to get the DNC to cover the costs of her wardrobe.

In 2012, Wasserman Schultz attempted to get the DNC to pay for her clothing at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, multiple sources say, but was blocked by staff in the committee’s Capitol Hill headquarters and at President Barack Obama’s reelection campaign headquarters in Chicago.

She asked again around Obama’s inauguration in 2013, pushing so hard that Obama senior adviser — and one-time Wasserman Schultz booster — Valerie Jarrett had to call her directly to get her to stop. (Jarrett said she does not recall that conversation.) One more time, according to independent sources with direct knowledge of the conversations, she tried again, asking for the DNC to buy clothing for the 2013 White House Correspondents’ Dinner.

Wasserman Schultz denies that she ever tried to get the DNC to pick up her clothing tab. “I think that would be a totally inappropriate use of DNC funds,” she said in a statement. “I never asked someone to do that for me, I would hope that no one would seek that on my behalf, and I’m not aware that anyone did.”
Read more at Politico

http://clashdaily.com/2014/09/let-backbiting-begin-dems-begin-devour-debbie/
« Last Edit: September 19, 2014, 10:54:24 am by rangerrebew »

Offline olde north church

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,117
Re: LET THE BACKBITING BEGIN: Dems Begin To Devour Debbie
« Reply #1 on: September 19, 2014, 12:09:16 pm »
Wardrobe costs?  Hmmmm, isn't that something a particular VP candy-date was accused of doing?  War on women indeed!
Why?  Well, because I'm a bastard, that's why.