mass wrote above:
[[ But they do abide by a moral code in that they are environmentally conscious, overly considerate in their relationships with others, and would much prefer to find common ground with an adversary than to fight or even engage in competition. ]]
The "preponderance of mindset" as expressed in your remarks above indicate (to me, at least) that the millennials are "fodder for the democrat's cannons", rather than being a potential constituency for either Republicans or conservatives.
All this goes back to a guy named Gramsci.
His suggestions have worked out quite well.
You continued:
[[ My point is they are not the ones in danger of becoming dinosaurs. We are. So it's not a question of whether they can do us any good, but whether we can do them any good. ]]
Fishrrman's credo:
"Reality is what it is. It is not what we believe it to be."
If what you say is true (and yes, it is), then we "dinosaurs" might as well accept the reality of it all, fill a glass with our favorite beverage, raise it high, and give a toast that the Founders' Republic made it as far as it did.
Because our time is all-but over.
As you also said, we might have quelled this wave, but that would have had to have been done back in the late fifties/early sixties. We are reaping the harvest from the seeds we let be planted back then.
(Aside: perhaps those who decried the coming of "sex, drugs and rock 'n' roll" weren't so crazy, after all!)
Those who remain willing to fight to "carry it on" might do well to start looking for someplace other than the United States in which to make "their last stand". Could be somewhere as remote as Australia or New Zealand, or even Iceland. Somewhere far away. It ain't gonna be here.
You continued:
[[ The transition from a regulated state to a free state will be ugly for a short time, but in the long run people will discover on their own that freedom requires a certain amount of discipline, character and personal responsibility. Once that lesson is learned, only then can we build a sustainable and productive civilization. ]]
Didn't some gal named Rand write a long tome about that back around 1957?
More than a decade ago, I came up with something I called, for lack of a better name, the "Titanic theory":
Think of that great ship.
After it struck the iceberg, it sank bow-first. As the bow sank lower, the stern rose higher. Those who couldn't get into the lifeboats moved to the stern, for it was to be the last place above the waterline.
The country is now analogous to the Titanic.
Some places are already far "underwater", and they aren't coming back up.
There are other areas that even yet remain high and dry, untouched by the chaos that is descending upon the places that have "gone under".
There are those onboard who remain oblivious to the situation before them.
There are others who understand the fate of the ship, who realize it's going down.
Your post above suggests that you are one of those who know "the ship is gone", and there's nothing that will save it. So be it. "Reality is what it is".
In the face of this, perhaps the best course of action for "conservatives" onboard is to get themselves and their families to those parts that will remain out-of-the-water for the longest.
This doesn't ultimately change fate. But it may give them enough time to live out the remainder of their time amongst others of like mind, in an environment that resembles that of their youths -- when the country was morally healthy as well as materially so. Back when the future seemed full of promises, instead of fear and loathing.
On the U.S.S. America what matters these days is no longer about saving the country. That's over and done.
Instead, it's personal.
It's about saving yourselves...