Author Topic: APNewsBreak: Obama to delay immigration action  (Read 818 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,691
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
APNewsBreak: Obama to delay immigration action
« on: September 06, 2014, 02:07:30 pm »
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_OBAMA_IMMIGRATION?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2014-09-06-09-51-02


Sep 6, 9:51 AM EDT

APNewsBreak: Obama to delay immigration action

By JIM KUHNHENN
Associated Press

 WASHINGTON (AP) -- Abandoning his pledge to act by the end of summer, President Barack Obama has decided to delay any executive action on immigration until after the November congressional elections, White House officials said.

The move is certain to infuriate immigration advocates while offering relief to some vulnerable Democrats in tough Senate re-election contests.

Two White House officials said Obama concluded that circumventing Congress through executive actions on immigration during the campaign would politicize the issue and hurt future efforts to pass a broad overhaul.

The officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the president's decision before it was announced, said Obama made his decision Friday as he returned to Washington from a NATO summit in Wales.

They said Obama called a few allies from Air Force One and informed them of his decision, and that the president made more calls from the White House on Saturday.

The officials said Obama had no specific timeline to act, but that he still would take his executive steps before the end of the year.

In a Rose Garden speech on June 30, Obama said he had directed Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson and Attorney General Eric Holder to give him recommendations for executive action by the end of summer. Obama also pledged to "adopt those recommendations without further delay."

Obama faced competing pressures from immigration advocacy groups that wanted prompt action and from Democrats worried that acting now would energize Republican opposition against vulnerable Senate Democrats. Among those considered most at risk were Democratic Sens. Mark Pryor of Arkansas, Mary Landrieu of Louisiana and Kay Hagan of North Carolina.

Obama advisers were not convinced that any presidential action would affect the elections. But the officials said the discussions around the timing grew more pronounced within the past few weeks.

Ultimately, the advisers drew a lesson from 1994 when Democratic losses were blamed on votes for gun control legislation, undermining any interest in passing future gun measures.

White House officials said aides realized that if Obama's immigration action was deemed responsible for Democratic losses this year, it could hurt any attempt to pass a broad overhaul later on.

Partisan fighting erupted recently over how to address the increased flow of unaccompanied minors from Central America at the U.S. border with Mexico. The officials said the White House had not envisioned such a battle when Obama made his pledge June 30.

Obama asked for $3.7 billion to address the border crisis. The Republican-controlled House, however, passed a measure that only gave Obama a fraction of what he sought and made it easier to deport the young migrants arriving at the border, a provision opposed by Democrats and immigration advocates. In the end, Congress adjourned without a final bill.

The number of minors caught alone illegally crossing the Mexican border into the United States has been declining since June. That decrease and Congress' absence from Washington during August has taken attention away from the border for now.

Still, the dispute over how to deal with the surge of Central American border crossers threatened to spill over into the larger debate over immigration and the fate of 11 million immigrants in the United States who either entered illegally or overstayed their visas and have been in the U.S. for some time.

The Democratic-led Senate last year passed a broad overhaul of immigration that boosted border security, increased visas for legal immigrants and a provided a path to citizenship for immigrants illegally in the country.

But the Republican-controlled House balked at acting on any broad measure and House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, informed Obama earlier this year that the House would not act in 2014. That led Obama to declare he would act on his own.

During a news conference Friday in Wales, Obama reiterated his determination to act on his own even as he avoided making a commitment on timing. He also spelled out ambitious objectives for his executive actions.

Obama said that without legislation from Congress, he would take steps to increase border security, upgrade the processing of border crossers and encourage legal immigration. He also said he would offer immigrants who have been illegally in the United States for some time a way to become legal residents, pay taxes, pay a fine and learn English.

"I want to be very clear: My intention is, in the absence of ... action by Congress, I'm going to do what I can do within the legal constraints of my office, because it's the right thing to do for the country," he said.

The extent of Obama's authority is a matter of debate among legal experts and in Congress. Some Democrats say it would be best for Obama to let Congress act.

But pro-immigrant groups called on Obama to stick to his end-of-summer deadline, and weighed in with a strongly worded appeal to him on Friday.

"Being a leader requires making difficult and courageous decisions," said the letter, whose signers included the National Council of La Raza and the League of United Latin American Citizens. "It is your time to lead, Mr. President."
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline massadvj

  • Editorial Advisor
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,346
  • Gender: Male
Re: APNewsBreak: Obama to delay immigration action
« Reply #1 on: September 06, 2014, 02:16:25 pm »
The pundits always point out that amnesty is a wedge issue for the GOP, but it is just as much a wedge issue for Democrats.  And right now, with the flood of kids from Central America coming across, the issue is toxic to them.  Whatever OPapaDoc did, it was going to be a disaster for him.  He took the path of least resistance.

That said, I have no doubt that once the midterms are over, he is going to act.  He may use his pardon powers to legitimize millions of illegals.

Online Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,660
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Re: APNewsBreak: Obama to delay immigration action
« Reply #2 on: September 07, 2014, 01:37:57 am »
mass wrote above:
[[ That said, I have no doubt that once the midterms are over, he is going to act.  He may use his pardon powers to legitimize millions of illegals. ]]

If that were to happen, would you still "doubt" what actions could conceivably be taken against him?
There is only ONE "action" that is prescribed by the Constitution to deal with a president that is totally out-of-control.

Hey -- do I really have to post this again?
(why yes, I do!)


Offline massadvj

  • Editorial Advisor
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,346
  • Gender: Male
Re: APNewsBreak: Obama to delay immigration action
« Reply #3 on: September 07, 2014, 02:17:17 am »
mass wrote above:
[[ That said, I have no doubt that once the midterms are over, he is going to act.  He may use his pardon powers to legitimize millions of illegals. ]]

If that were to happen, would you still "doubt" what actions could conceivably be taken against him?
There is only ONE "action" that is prescribed by the Constitution to deal with a president that is totally out-of-control.

Hey -- do I really have to post this again?
(why yes, I do!)



The president has the constitutional power to pardon, so granting amnesty to illegals would not be a crime.  But he has committed other impeachable offenses, in particular releasing Gitmo prisoners without notifying Congress.

Offline kevindavis007

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,437
  • Gender: Male
Re: APNewsBreak: Obama to delay immigration action
« Reply #4 on: September 07, 2014, 02:52:50 am »
My take it is this, he was hoping there was going to be an impeachment over this.. But since there was no calls for one, he decided to wait...  That is my take.
Join The Reagan Caucus: https://reagancaucus.org/ and the Eisenhower Caucus: https://EisenhowerCaucus.org

Offline Formerly Once-Ler

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 0
Re: APNewsBreak: Obama to delay immigration action
« Reply #5 on: September 07, 2014, 07:40:07 am »
The pundits always point out that amnesty is a wedge issue for the GOP, but it is just as much a wedge issue for Democrats.  And right now, with the flood of kids from Central America coming across, the issue is toxic to them.  Whatever OPapaDoc did, it was going to be a disaster for him.  He took the path of least resistance.

That said, I have no doubt that once the midterms are over, he is going to act.  He may use his pardon powers to legitimize millions of illegals.

You are absolutely correct about immigration being toxic for rats too.  I wouldn't rule out a bipartisan bill before Obama does nothing to back up his threat of amnesty.

Offline massadvj

  • Editorial Advisor
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,346
  • Gender: Male
Re: APNewsBreak: Obama to delay immigration action
« Reply #6 on: September 07, 2014, 11:46:30 am »
My take it is this, he was hoping there was going to be an impeachment over this.. But since there was no calls for one, he decided to wait...  That is my take.

I think you are right.  I would take that a bit farther and suggest that OPapaDoc instigated the flood of refugee children over the summer to create a crisis that would justify his taking executive action.  It backfired big time, but I have no doubt that leftist political money found its way into the Mexican drug cartels for the purpose of bringing thousands of Central American kids up here.  We already know there were people in Honduras and elsewhere recruiting kids with the promise of amnesty.  That promise would not have caused tens of thousands of people to act unless it was backed up with money and logistics.  Who else would have the motive and capability to provide that money?