0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
we're talking past each other. I know what it is. I also know that Feinstein does not care about the Constitution. All she cares about is power and by not telling her Obama insulted her because he snubbed her own lust for power. She uses the Constitution as a tool to accomplish what she wants and when it becomes inconvenient she drops it and steps all over it.
But Constutionally, and as a member of a committee and Congress she has a right to be angry. She can use the Constitution anyway she wants unless you want to amend the Consstitution.
Saxby Chambliss is also angry and he is a ranking Republican on the intelligence Committee
This is what Saxby Chambliss from Georgia had to say:http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=2&sqi=2&ved=0CCkQqQIwAQ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gwinnettdailypost.com%2Fnews%2F2014%2Fjun%2F04%2Fus-sen-saxby-chambliss-urges-white-house-to%2F&ei=CNqPU5WFMoq2yAT9uYLQBg&usg=AFQjCNE1D3miqVbxyli8OQX-5j2f3ttqdw&bvm=bv.68235269,d.aWw
So the soldiers and former soldiers criticizing Bergdahl are "un-American?" I'm not sure you want to go there, Claire Only the GOP could mess up getting her out of office by running a dumpster fire like Todd Akin.
@clairecmc - Are you calling the soldiers criticizing the record of Bergdahl "un-American?" #bergdahl #berghazi
Of course, but that's irrelevant. She's mad because she wasn't let in on the deal - she'd be mad whether she had the "right" or not.
She's mad because she wasn't let in on the deal
It won't make any difference, but here is what I sent to Mccaskill on Twitter.
I do not have Twitter because I do not believe it that stuff but I know what you probably said
It's worth getting an account. Not to put your stuff out there - 99% of that is wasted bandwidth - but I use it to follow about 200 different news channels. They tweet stuff first, before they put it up on the web site or print it. It is literally up to the second reports on different stories.