John W K attacks on Mark Levin's Liberty Amendments on FR

[XenaLee]

I happened to come across this forum in which a poster attacked me instead of what I posted.  I was hoping the poster would elaborate on the comments made.

I'm not sure why you have a problem with that.

JWK

There was a time not too long ago in New York when the able-bodied were ashamed to accept home relief, a program created by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1931 when he was Governor. Now, New York City and many other major cities are infested with countless government cheese factions from **** hole countries, who not only demand welfare, but use it to buy beer, wine, drugs, sex, and Lotto tickets.

Come on.   Admit it.  You really are a Sag.... right?

[Frank Cannon]

A new troll to play with.  Thanks Mom.

So let me get this straight. JWK from JR's site is upset that is MG full of MGD experienced a B and E?

[WingNot]

So let me get this straight. JWK from JR's site is upset that is MG full of MGD experienced a B and E?

Seeing as how the FNG is such a VIP, shouldn't we keep the PC on the QT? 'Cause if it leaks to the VC he could end up MIA, and then we'd all be put on KP

[XenaLee]

So let me get this straight. JWK from JR's site is upset that is MG full of MGD experienced a B and E?

Maybe he's suffering from withdrawal of S and M....

[johnwk]

Did you read the book or just the Salon opinions on it.

Please show how exactly the requirement for Congress to not spend more than it takes in is as bad as you vaguely hint that it is.

Now why would I attempt to do what you ask when I actually promote Congress balances the budget on an annual basis, and without any loopholes, which is not what Levin's liberty amendment would do?

What I support is the Fair Share Balanced Budget Amendment which would actually compel Congress to balance the budget on an annual basis, and would also end our federal government's love affair with the socialist/communist tax calculated from profits, gains, tips, wages and other "incomes". It would also restore that part of the Founder's Great Compromise requiring "representation with a proportional financial obligation" whenever a direct tax is laid.


JWK

 

[jpsb]

Levin is a smart guy and knows how to connect the dots, but he is rude, self serving and at
times unprincipled.

[Sanguine]

Levin is a smart guy and knows how to connect the dots, but he is rude, self serving and at
times unprincipled.

...none of which is the topic of this thread.  This very, very old thread.

[jpsb]

...none of which is the topic of this thread.  This very, very old thread.

@Sanguine

You should turn me in for trying to hijack a Mark Levin thread with a comment on Mark Levin.

[WingNot]

...none of which is the topic of this thread.  This very, very old thread.

Baby, we are going to drive this topic so far off the rails you'd think a Democrat was at the stick.

[johnwk]

Welcome to TBR...this thread was several years ago..I don't even remember it...

And I didn't know it existed until I stumbled upon it early this morning.  The personal attack on me, and not upon what I wrote, encouraged me to see what's up.   Hopefully the conversation will become more productive and focus on subject matter rather than personal attacks.

JWK


 
The unavoidable truth is, our social democrats’ plan for “free” college tuition will be paid for by taxing the paychecks of millions of college graduates who worked for and paid their own way through college and are now trying to finance their own economic needs. 

[johnwk]

...none of which is the topic of this thread.  This very, very old thread.

And just what is the topic of the thread?

JWK

[mystery-ak]

And I didn't know it existed until I stumbled upon it early this morning.  The personal attack on me, and not upon what I wrote, encouraged me to see what's up.   Hopefully the conversation will become more productive and focus on subject matter rather than personal attacks.

JWK


 
The unavoidable truth is, our social democrats’ plan for “free” college tuition will be paid for by taxing the paychecks of millions of college graduates who worked for and paid their own way through college and are now trying to finance their own economic needs. 

Well our members are usually more welcoming than this..perhaps they remember you from FR..I really don't so I can't explain the attacks...but I always welcome new members.

[WingNot]

FYI Dipstick,

The person who you feel maligned you is no longer with our little group. 

So move on or be gone.

[txradioguy]

Well our members are usually more welcoming than this..perhaps they remember you from FR..I really don't so I can't explain the attacks...but I always welcome new members.

Probably has something to do with the manner in which he made his arrival and the fact that he brought back from the dead a 3 year old thread as his way of saying "hello".

[ABX]

Now???   Dude.... that was over three years ago.   WTF?  Are you a Sagittarius, perchance (better late then never)?

Meh, not even worth the time to try to remember a thread from that long ago. I cited my sources. That suffices here. Not going to be baited into some ancient thread from some nobody freeper. (especially against Levin whose credentials are known and respected).

[WingNot]

Probably has something to do with the manner in which he made his arrival and the fact that he brought back from the dead a 3 year old thread as his way of saying "hello".

Yah maybe that... or maybe he is just and azzhole. 

[johnwk]

FYI Dipstick,

The person who you feel maligned you is no longer with our little group. 

So move on or be gone.

Mark Levin is still promoting amendments to our Constitution which would acutally make constitutional, various things our Founders sought to forbid.  Does that conversation not deserve the attention of those who support and defend our written Constitution and its legislative intent?

JWK

  "The Constitution is the act of the people, speaking in their original character, and defining the permanent conditions of the social alliance; and there can be no doubt on the point with us, that every act of the legislative power contrary to the true intent and meaning of the Constitution, is absolutely null and void. ___ Chancellor James Kent, in his Commentaries on American Law (1858)

[txradioguy]

Now why would I attempt to do what you ask when I actually promote Congress balances the budget on an annual basis, and without any loopholes, which is not what Levin's liberty amendment would do?

That is exactly what his Amendment would require...a balanced budget and limit federal spending and taxation.

Specifically what is wrong with limiting spending to 17.5% of GDP and requiring a three-fifths vote to raise the debt ceiling or limiting the power to tax to 15% of an individual’s income, prohibiting other forms of taxation, and placing the deadline to file one’s taxes one day before the next federal election.

Please be specific.  Don't dissemble.

That's about as Conservative as you can get.

What I support is the Fair Share Balanced Budget Amendment which would actually compel Congress to balance the budget on an annual basis, and would also end our federal government's love affair with the socialist/communist tax calculated from profits, gains, tips, wages and other "incomes". It would also restore that part of the Founder's Great Compromise requiring "representation with a proportional financial obligation" whenever a direct tax is laid.

"Fair share" is Lib speak for "tax the rich".  Nothing is going to "compel" the Congress except brute force at this point to balance the budget.  They haven't even felt compelled to do their fiduciary duty and pass a budget in 9 years now.  What makes you think they will be compelled on their own to balance a budget.

As for your proportional financial obligation...47% of the country pays nothing in taxes each year and the top 505 of wage earners pay nearly all of it.

Where is your "fair share" or "proportional financial obligation" figure into that?

BTW I notice this "Fair Share" tax thingy seems to be something you ginned up on your own and tried to pimp over on the Hannity Forums last April.

http://forums.hannity.com/entry.php?1560-The-Fair-Share-Balanced-Budget-Amendment-reform-is-not-complicated!


How'd that work out for you over there?

[txradioguy]

Mark Levin is still promoting amendments to our Constitution which would acutally make constitutional, various things our Founders sought to forbid.  Does that conversation not deserve the attention of those who support and defend our written Constitution and its legislative intent?

JWK

  "The Constitution is the act of the people, speaking in their original character, and defining the permanent conditions of the social alliance; and there can be no doubt on the point with us, that every act of the legislative power contrary to the true intent and meaning of the Constitution, is absolutely null and void. ___ Chancellor James Kent, in his Commentaries on American Law (1858)

No he does not.  And no matter how many times you reapt your BS it won't make it so.

I dare say knows more about the Constitution than this entire forum (including you) combined.

[WingNot]

Mark Levin is still promoting amendments to our Constitution which would acutally make constitutional, various things our Founders sought to forbid.  Does that conversation not deserve the attention of those who support and defend our written Constitution and its legislative intent?

JWK

I have a suggestion....Take your Levin Hate Boner back to wherever you came from

[Sanguine]

Baby, we are going to drive this topic so far off the rails you'd think a Democrat was at the stick.

You've got a point.   

[jpsb]

No he does not.  And no matter how many times you reapt your BS it won't make it so.

I dare say knows more about the Constitution than this entire forum (including you) combined.

I agreed with you, but he claimed Cruz was a natural born citizen and he knows damn well
Cruz is not, which is why I called him unprincipled. Don't get me wrong I mostly like Levin
but I do not trust him.

[XenaLee]

Meh, not even worth the time to try to remember a thread from that long ago. I cited my sources. That suffices here. Not going to be baited into some ancient thread from some nobody freeper. (especially against Levin whose credentials are known and respected).

I concur.   But.... this thread is like a train wreck.  You .... just.... can't....look.... away.  LOLOL

[txradioguy]

I agreed with you, but he claimed Cruz was a natural born citizen and he knows damn well
Cruz is not, which is why I called him unprincipled. Don't get me wrong I mostly like Levin
but I do not trust him.

Not even gonna start that debate again right now and show you again where you're wrong.  Save that for another day.

I'm curious to see if the n00b actually has the knowledge to get into the weeds on this or if he's just a superficial smear artist.

[jpsb]

Not even gonna start that debate again right now and show you again where you're wrong.  Save that for another day.

Agreed, I'm tired of that debate.