Author Topic: Biofuel groups swing back at oil industry, defend federal blending mandate  (Read 1667 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 71,613
  • Gender: Female
http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/312631-biofuel-groups-answer-oil-industry-attacks-with-ad-blitz


Biofuel groups swing back at oil industry, defend federal blending mandate
By Zack Colman - 07/22/13 03:53 PM ET

Biofuel groups are swinging back at oil industry attacks on a federal biofuel-blending mandate with an ad campaign targeting lawmakers and viewers inside the Beltway.

Fuels America, a coalition of biofuel organizations, launched a campaign Monday that includes print, television and online ads as well as ads on the D.C. Metro system. The effort comes as the House Energy and Commerce Committee prepares to host a two-day hearing on the Renewable Fuel Standard.

The advertisements will run through the end of the year. While Fuels America didn’t release a dollar figure for the endeavor, Renewable Fuels Association CEO Bob Dinneen said the cost reflects “a very serious effort.”

The advertisements revolve around the slogan “there is a choice,” underscoring charges by the biofuel industry that oil firms want to dismantle the Renewable Fuel Standard to keep the market reserved for conventional petroleum.

The initiative comes as the Renewable Fuel Standard’s opponents are increasing pressure and both the House and the Senate are ramping up oversight of the rule.

Energy and Commerce Chairman Fred Upton (R-Mich.) and Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), the panel's ranking member, have released a series of white papers on the topic, setting the stage for possible legislation.

They’ll test the waters on that front with the two-day hearing that begins Tuesday.

Separately, Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) last week pledged to look into the Renewable Fuel Standard, saying he has concerns about whether the mandate’s blending targets can be met.

The oil industry, meat producers and some green groups hold those concerns as well.

They’re pushing either for a repeal of or changes to the rule, which requires refiners to combine 36 billion gallons of biofuel with conventional petroleum by 2022.

Environmental groups are pushing lawmakers for more targeted tweaks, largely affecting the corn ethanol portion of the mandate.

The oil industry wants a full repeal. They say refiners are approaching a “blend wall,” forcing them to blend higher concentrations of ethanol blends to meet the mandate’s accelerating targets.

Its main trade association, the American Petroleum Institute, started an advertising campaign earlier this month that took shots at the standard.

The biofuel industry is pushing back.

Tom Buis, chief executive of corn ethanol group Growth Energy, on Monday called the oil industry’s efforts a “desperate attempt to get congress to change law because they’re afraid of competition.”

The standard’s supporters say it’s been an economic boon for rural communities.

They also contend changing it would spook investment in next-generation biofuels. Those biofuels have been slow to come online, but advocates say facilities are just now starting to churn them out in commercial volumes.

Full repeal seems an unlikely outcome, as the standard has a devoted bloc of Midwest and rural boosters on both sides of the aisle.

The Obama administration also has voiced support for the mandate. Heather Zichal, President Obama’s top climate and energy adviser, stumped for the standard in an event last week hosted by The Hill.

More specific changes, however, remain a possibility. Some key lawmakers, including biofuel backer Rep. Ed Whitfield (R-Ky.), who chairs the Energy and Commerce Energy and Power subcommittee, have said alterations could be in the offing.

The biofuel industry has maintained that the EPA has enough authority to address the issues its opponents have raised.

The EPA has “more than enough flexibility,” Dinneen said. “We don’t see any need for legislation.”



�The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.� G Washington July 2, 1776

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 71,613
  • Gender: Female
Never mind it takes more energy to convert to energy and ruins out automobiles in the process... 
�The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.� G Washington July 2, 1776

Oceander

  • Guest
Yeah, it's great taking food out of the mouths of poor hungry babes in order to line the pockets of the biofuels executives.

Offline truth_seeker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,386
  • Gender: Male
  • Common Sense Results Oriented Conservative Veteran
If/when conventional oil is plentiful, it makes sense to scale back biofuels subsidies or eliminate them entirely.

Biofuels is a corn industry subsidy. Other crops have given way to subsidized corn for biofuels.

This is nothing more than subsidized corn industry lobbying.

The town I lived in as a child was at the time sugar beet country, but now is subsidized corn country. It is also among the Northern Colorado breakaway counties, claiming their conservative values.

I wonder if that means getting off the federal dole, too?

With the GOP doing so well in farm states, don't expect the elected reps to do the right thing, very easily.

That is politics.

"God must love the common man, he made so many of them.�  Abe Lincoln

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 71,613
  • Gender: Female
Colorado is one of the fracking states...
�The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.� G Washington July 2, 1776

Offline jmyrlefuller

  • J. Myrle Fuller
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,359
  • Gender: Male
  • Realistic nihilist
    • Fullervision
Quote
Biofuels is a corn industry subsidy. Other crops have given way to subsidized corn for biofuels.

This is nothing more than subsidized corn industry lobbying.
Indeed. The corn lobby-- thanks in large part to the corn-growing state of Iowa having the first spot on the political calendar and a firm swing-state status-- holds a lot of power in this country. That's part of the reason high-fructose corn syrup was the dominant sweetener the past couple decades (although that is changing as of late).

I used to be a believer in the whole concept of ethanol. Then I realized the effort needed to produce it in any mass quantity was not worth the trouble, at least using modern industrial machinery and techniques. At that point I realized it was nothing more than a corn-lobby racket.
New profile picture in honor of Public Domain Day 2024

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 71,613
  • Gender: Female
It's a negative on so many levels.  Requires more energy to convert to to energy.  Damage to vehicles and downright devastating for marine vessels.  It's driven up the cost of beef, pork and poultry production as well as other food products and it is really hurting poor societies where corn is a staple of life. 

BTW his being honest about all this and lack of support for is what cost Rick Perry Iowa.... the ethanol industry went after him big-time.
�The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.� G Washington July 2, 1776

Oceander

  • Guest
If/when conventional oil is plentiful, it makes sense to scale back biofuels subsidies or eliminate them entirely.

Biofuels is a corn industry subsidy. Other crops have given way to subsidized corn for biofuels.

This is nothing more than subsidized corn industry lobbying.

The town I lived in as a child was at the time sugar beet country, but now is subsidized corn country. It is also among the Northern Colorado breakaway counties, claiming their conservative values.

I wonder if that means getting off the federal dole, too?

With the GOP doing so well in farm states, don't expect the elected reps to do the right thing, very easily.

That is politics.



That is a very good question:  it's all well and good to say that your neighbor's ox should be gored, but it takes a lot of strength to stand by your principles when it's your ox that's to be gored.