Author Topic: 'The Third Bullet' Review: Stephen Hunter Unwraps Savvy New Theory on JFK's Death  (Read 3028 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 382,604
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Hollywood/2013/03/29/The-Third-Bullet-Review-The-Novel-Hunter-Was-Meant-to-Write

 by Zachary Leeman 1 Apr 2013

Retired Marine Sniper Bob Lee Swagger and former Washington Post film critic Stephen Hunter are back with The Third Bullet and, after more than 20 years together thrilling audiences with stories of war and the art of the hunt, the two men have teamed up for the novel they were always meant to pull off.

In a move that is rather genius in its simplicity, Hunter has taken his old protagonist and thrown him a mystery that has haunted America for 50 years: who killed President John F. Kennedy? Everybody's got a theory. Some say it was Communists, some say it was aliens, others may even tell you it was a Tea Partier sent back in time.

However, Hunter has no time for foolish conspiracies. In his novel he presents a theory that is ridiculously plausible that is supported and sustained by the one thing most readers love about Hunter: his substantial knowledge about firearms.

The Third Bullet opens with what is Hunter's most original and creative first chapter (and this is the man that wrote the opening to Dirty White Boys). He kills off a man that creepily and humorously resembles Hunter himself. The thriller writer is killed by automobile when he comes just a bit too close to solving the JFK conspiracy. The man's wife hunts down Bob the Nailer and Bob is off with a new mystery to solve. He goes everywhere from Moscow to Texas, fighting off bad guys the only way he knows how: with guns and lots of 'em.

The reason Hunter's novel is so strong is because it's not just another clever thriller or adventure for Swagger. Hunter has taken a legitimate mystery and he uses his own expertise and Swagger's to apply gun knowledge to the mystery and present a theory that many others haven't touched over the years. I won't give away the details, but it's damn good.

Most of Hunter's readers know the ins and outs of firearms and love Hunter for his details when it comes to weapons and his accuracy in representing them. Those fans will love this book because never has Hunter's gun knowledge or gun play been so well or heavily displayed on the page.

Hunter's other talent (and sometimes saving grace) is that he is a born writer. Other writers like Tom Clancy and Clive Cussler can become bores when they drag on and on about whatever new toy they are describing (whether it be a submarine or an artifact or whatever). They take readers completely out of the story to give endless facts and figures while Hunter weaves such details into his storytelling. It's incredibly unique and only goes to show that Hunter is at the top of the list when it comes to modern thriller writers.

Besides the central mystery, The Third Bullet still has a lot to offer. It's not one book, but two. We get Swagger's story and we also get the first-person account of the main conspirator in the JFK assassination (his identity is a nice surprise for longtime Hunter readers). Hunter weaves these two books together, so we get a thrilling account of not just Swagger's adventures, but an account of the day of Nov. 22nd, 1963 as well.

From its brilliantly amusing opening to its powerful final moments, it's easy to sense that The Third Bullet is the novel Hunter and Swagger were always meant to create. It's the culmination of years of writing, shooting and learning. It's the novel that sets in stone the fact that Hunter is a damn good writer and Bob Lee Swagger is a damn fine hero. And if the final moments of The Third Bullet are to be believed: these two old birds ain't done yet.
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline Lando Lincoln

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,516
  • Gender: Male
Wow!  My kinda book!  Thanks for the post myst.
There are some among us who live in rooms of experience we can never enter.
John Steinbeck

Offline Rivergirl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,036
Now that Arlen Specter is dead we may get more truth about the murder of JFK.

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 71,613
  • Gender: Female
I have never believed that magic bullet they found was not planted.
�The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.� G Washington July 2, 1776

Offline Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51,470
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
I have never believed that magic bullet they found was not planted.

It WAS planted on a hospital gurney outside the operating room of Parkland Hospital by Jack Ruby.
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien

Offline Lando Lincoln

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,516
  • Gender: Male
Okay, this will be my only post on the matter because I have learned over these many years that it is nearly impossible to sway opinion (mine included) on this topic - especially in a setting like this.

The Kennedy assassination was the result of a tragic nexus of a disturbed individual and opportunity.  Oswald was the lone gunman.  No impact from the front, no magic bullet, no planting of evidence at the scene or hospital. The shots were easy for an experienced shooter, even with the Mannlicher Carcano.  Even as a poor marksman (which may or may not have been the case), Oswald needed to be successful only once - and he was. 

What there was in abundance: incompetence.  By the cops, the feds, the hospital.  Everywhere.
There are some among us who live in rooms of experience we can never enter.
John Steinbeck

Offline Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51,470
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
Okay, this will be my only post on the matter because I have learned over these many years that it is nearly impossible to sway opinion (mine included) on this topic - especially in a setting like this.

The Kennedy assassination was the result of a tragic nexus of a disturbed individual and opportunity.  Oswald was the lone gunman.  No impact from the front, no magic bullet, no planting of evidence at the scene or hospital. The shots were easy for an experienced shooter, even with the Mannlicher Carcano.  Even as a poor marksman (which may or may not have been the case), Oswald needed to be successful only once - and he was. 

What there was in abundance: incompetence.  By the cops, the feds, the hospital.  Everywhere.

I have only one question which, to date, no one has ever answered.

Why would someone acting alone as supposedly Oswald was, pass up all of the VERY much easier shot opportunities presented to him as the president's limo came up Elm street directly toward him and nearly stopped directly below him in order to make the approx. 120 deg turn onto the Stemmons Freeway entrance ramp in favor of  shots at a target accelerating away from him at a declining angle? 

The military answer to that is that he waited until the target was in the predetermined kill zone of the ambush. 

In my view Lee Harvey Oswald was exactly what he claimed to be. A patsy set up to take the fall.
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 71,613
  • Gender: Female
Have you read The Road to Dallas, Bigun?  I have it and started it, but I've been so distracted with work I haven't really gotten into it yet.......... but in line with your comments:

http://www.amazon.com/Road-Dallas-Assassination-John-Kennedy/dp/0674034724

Book Description
Publication Date: November 30, 2009

Neither a random event nor the act of a lone madman—the assassination of President John F. Kennedy was an appalling and grisly conspiracy. This is the unvarnished story.

With deft investigative skill, David Kaiser shows that the events of November 22, 1963, cannot be understood without fully grasping the two larger stories of which they were a part: the U.S. government’s campaign against organized crime, which began in the late 1950s and accelerated dramatically under Robert Kennedy; and the furtive quest of two administrations—along with a cadre of private interest groups—to eliminate Fidel Castro.

The seeds of conspiracy go back to the Eisenhower administration, which recruited top mobsters in a series of plots to assassinate the Cuban leader. The CIA created a secretive environment in which illicit networks were allowed to expand in dangerous directions. The agency’s links with the Mafia continued in the Kennedy administration, although the President and his closest advisors—engaged in their own efforts to overthrow Castro—thought this skullduggery had ended. Meanwhile, Cuban exiles, right-wing businessmen, and hard-line anti-Communists established ties with virtually anyone deemed capable of taking out the Cuban premier. Inevitably those ties included the mob.

The conspiracy to kill JFK took shape in response to Robert Kennedy’s relentless attacks on organized crime—legal vendettas that often went well beyond the normal practices of law enforcement. Pushed to the wall, mob leaders merely had to look to the networks already in place for a solution. They found it in Lee Harvey Oswald—the ideal character to enact their desperate revenge against the Kennedys.

Comprehensive, detailed, and informed by original sources, The Road to Dallas adds surprising new material to every aspect of the case. It brings to light the complete, frequently shocking, story of the JFK assassination and its aftermath.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

From Publishers Weekly
Starred Review. While plenty of authors have argued that the Mafia and anti-Castro Cubans were behind the assassination of President Kennedy, few have done so as convincingly as Naval War College history professor Kaiser (American Tragedy: Kennedy, Johnson, and the Origins of the Vietnam War). Kaiser bills this as the first [Kennedy assassination book] written by a professional historian who has researched the available archives, and his attention to detail and use of recently released FBI and CIA files put this analysis ahead of many of its fellows. Kaiser focuses on the tantalizing testimony of Cuban exile Silvia Odio, who claimed to have met Lee Harvey Oswald in the company of Cuban activists, and on the U.S. government's efforts to kill Castro and Robert Kennedy's crusade against organized crime. By taking Oswald's guilt as a given and focusing on the people he crossed paths with and their motives and connections, Kaiser mostly succeeds in avoiding complex and narrative-derailing forensic discussions. This is a deeply disturbing look at a national tragedy, and Kaiser's sober tone and reasoned analysis may well convince some in the Oswald-was-a-lone-nut camp. 30 b&w illus. not seen by PW. (Mar.)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Review
Finally a historian, without preconceptions, has looked at the voluminous, once secret documents produced by the CIA, the FBI, and other government agencies in response to the JFK Assassination Records Act of 1992. Kaiser's nuanced conclusions on Oswald's guilt and the ominous issue of conspiracy will command respect from even those who disagree with them. Comprehensive, beautifully crafted, and well-reasoned. An essential addition to the JFK corpus.
--G. Robert Blakey, Notre Dame Law School, and former Chief Counsel of the House Select Committee on Assassinations

While plenty of authors have argued that the Mafia and anti-Castro Cubans were behind the assassination of President Kennedy, few have done so as convincingly as Naval War College history professor Kaiser...His attention to detail and use of recently released FBI and CIA files put this analysis ahead of many of its fellows...This is a deeply disturbing look at a national tragedy, and Kaiser's sober tone and reasoned analysis may well convince some in the Oswald-was-a-lone-nut camp. (Publishers Weekly (starred review) 20071126)

In the seemingly neverending arms race between the lone-assassin and the conspiracy theorists, Kaiser adds a serious piece of scholarship to the arsenal of those who believe Americans have yet to learn the whole truth about the assassination of JFK. (Kirkus Reviews 20080101)

A scrupulously researched account, which may be one of the best books yet on the assassination...Kaiser posits that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone gunman although he did not act alone: the murder plot was hatched by Mafia bosses Santo Trafficante, John Roselli, and Sam Giancana as revenge for Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy's relentless pursuit of the mob and for the vast sums of money they lost when Castro closed Cuba's mob-controlled casinos. Other startling revelations are that Oswald might have been a CIA agent, even though he was promised a large sum of money by the mob to kill Kennedy, and that Jack Ruby killed Oswald on orders from the Mafia, to which Ruby was connected. This detailed, often chilling account stands out among the overwhelming number of assassination books.
--Karl Helicher (Library Journal (starred review) 20080201)

A thorough recounting of facts interspersed with interpretations and opinions that carry the weight of someone who knows how to analyze history... Kaiser isn't the first to suggest JFK was assassinated by a conspiracy of anti-Castro Cubans upset at Kennedy's failure to eliminate Fidel Castro and a Mafia enraged by the obsession of JFK's attorney general, his brother Robert Kennedy, to attack organized crime. But Kaiser may be the first to reach the depth of reporting the facts that support this theory...It would be hard to imagine anyone but Kennedy assassination scholars and historians not learning something new in Kaiser's book. For fans of Oliver Stone's movie JFK (1991) and JFK assassination junkies, the book is the latest--and perhaps best--view of the historic event.
--Roman Modrowski (Chicago Sun-Times 20080323)

In The Road to Dallas we see the rare vindication of the lunatic fringe, as Kaiser--who teaches history at the Naval War College--puts forth the first serious historical study to confirm what we've long suspected: that JFK's killing was not the work of a lone madman. Comprehensive and well documented, The Road to Dallas connects the dots from the CIA to Carlos Marcello with convincing thoroughness. If you think you've had enough of grassy-knoll theories, this book will surprise you.
--Leopold Froehlich (Playboy 20080401)

Historian David Kaiser's meticulously researched new work, The Road to Dallas, about the shocking and clandestine maneuverings of our CIA and FBI under President John F. Kennedy, paints a disturbing portrait of what often goes undetected at the highest levels of government...Kaiser's investigation seems to put to rest the long-held notion put forth by the Warren Report that Oswald acted alone and was simply a nutty gunman. He examines new evidence that lays out Oswald's extensive entanglements with suspicious persons prior to the assassination...Kaiser's fine book destroys any romantic view of world politics we might wish to cling to--and shows us a much darker reality.
--Elaine Margolin (Denver Post 20080404)

A most interesting book on the JFK killing--much better than almost all the rest...It is 509 pages long, costs $35, and is well worth the time and money...[The] trove of official material has been sifted by some (not as many as one might expect) writers and historians in the intervening years, but by none exhibiting Kaiser‘s dogged approach, application of logic, clear writing style, understandable presentation and impressive analytical ability...This is a dynamite book--understandable, readable and as vivid as the best crime novels. Only this hit job happened. And it changed our world.
--John Hanchette (Niagara Falls Reporter 20080701)

We may yet one day discover a "smoking gun" that makes all other theories fall away. Until then, Kaiser's book may rise to be the most plausible explanation we are likely to read.
--Richard Delevan (Irish Independent 20080628)

Kaiser, a respected professional historian at the Naval War College, combed through mounds of previously classified documents to craft an interesting, well-written account of the days leading up to the assassination. Kaiser effectively places the events that transpired in Dallas within the context of contemporary politics. He masterfully tracks the administration's vendetta against organized crime and the numerous Kennedy-era assassination plots against Fidel Castro. The author lucidly argues that the assassination, although carried out by Lee Harvey Oswald, was the culmination of Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy's crusade against the mob. While this conspiracy theory is not new, the supporting documentation and the captivating account laid out by an established historian makes for some fascinating reading.
--J. B. Cook (Choice 20090201)

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 Thorough, best is at the end April 13, 2008
By MT57
Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase
Full disclosure: I haven't read that many books on the subject but have always tended to believe it was a setup of some kind involving the mob and someone else. Principal reasons being Ruby's killing Oswald, and the murders of prime Mob suspects in 1975 during the Congressional investigation.

Now the review:

This book is painstakingly researched. The accumulation of detail makes for a difficult read for a while. It could have used an editor in the early chapters. For example, the minor figure Irving Davidson is introduced three times by his full name with a brief biographic sentence.

Toward the end, it really picks up speed. The week of the assassination reads quite well and conveys many convincing details.

The author - who teaches at the Naval War College - has apparently picked up the work of certain investigators on the 1970's Congressional investigation and I imagine they provided some direction to his efforts. They are cited in the book from time to time. The data in this volume, however, is not a pure rehash. It includes some recently declassified CIA documents. The evidence is utterly circumstantial, and there is of course no smoking gun or the book would have a lot more publicity. Every once in a while the author's speculation went past my threshold of credulity. I think he fails to recognize the healthy possibility that in the hysteria of the aftermath of the assassination there were many people who, like Catholics who convince themselves of apparitions of the Blessed Mother, convinced themselves of having seen Oswald or Ruby or that they heard someone make a veiled reference to plans for the assassination.

Midway through the book, I was losing confidence in my own beliefs as it didn't seem the details were adding up to anything at all. The author speculates Oswald may have been a double agent for the CIA - his pro-Castro public persona is suggested to be a cover for an attempt by someone, presumably the CIA, to introduce him into Cuba to shoot Castro. I didn't find that all that compelling as there is no rational explanation how he then goes off and shoots JFK.

Still, the details that come from more reliable sources, like telephone records, and so forth, eventually become compelling. And once Oswald goes to Mexico to attempt to obtain a visa for Cuba, the story picks up some traction. Oswald comes off as a totally unstable person. As one mob figure is quoted years later, Oswald didn't know if he was working for a pro-Castro or an anti-Castro organization. And the book definitely convinces in relation to that. For a while, I was thinking to myself, this is proving the nutty lone gunman theory. Then I realized, just because the guy is a nut, doesn't mean he wasn't being used by somebody. And when you read about Ruby's and a few other low-level mob figures' actions around the day of the assassination, and that Oswald had an uncle in Marcello's crime family, it becomes hard to doubt that the somebody was the mob.

The thesis of the book is that Oswald was the instrument of a somewhat improvised alliance - conspiracy may be too organized - between anti-Castro Cubans, right-wing Americans down south, a couple of strange Europeans, and the Mafia. The contours of this alliance are unclear. Certain Mafia figures are named, particularly Marcello and Trafficante, but also the 1975 murder victims, Giancana, Hoffa and Roselli. One mob figure is specifically identified as having carried messages between two of those names, relative to the intent to kill JFK, but it is long before Dallas and there is no tie to Ruby or Oswald in the message. There is no one as notorious from the other groups tied as closely to the murder, although there are a couple of low-level anti-Castro names in Dallas near the relevant time and a couple gun dealers/runners as well. The motives for the murder are mixed: was it designed to provoke a US invasion of Cuba? Or was it just elimination of the Kennedys from the executive branch, to turn down the heat on the mob? Maybe both. The author lays them all out there but has little hard evidence of the motives.

Anyway, although most of the relevant witnesses are dead, and probably not a lot of documentary evidence remains unexamined, and so the full details will never be fully proved, I thank the author for doing a terrific job, for history's sake, of compiling what evidence there is of the forces that were likely behind Oswald.
�The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.� G Washington July 2, 1776

Offline Cincinnatus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,513
The JFK assassination took place in broad daylight in a major American city with dozens and dozens of eye witnesses, including police and Secret Service agents, and yet here we are 50 years later still debating what actually happpened. That alone is a most interesting dimension to the story.

I have made the assassination a minor hobby with several books, and have read a number of 'net commentaries. Not that I am an expert but certainly a reasonably well informed amateur.

All that said the best book I have ever read on the subject is the little known "Mortal Error" by Bonar Menninger which outlines the ballistics tests performed by expert Howard Donahue.

Donahue was such a recognized expert he was one of 11 shooters invited by CBS to demonstrate whether the Warren Commission was correct in saying Oswald could have gotten off 3 shots that rapidly with a Mannlicher-Carcano rifle. Of the 11 only Mr Donahue was able to do so but doubted Oswald could have done it with any accuracy.

So he conducted his own tests and concluded that based on an examination of the medical, ballistic and other evidence pointed to a bullet from the agent's AR-15 rifle that blew the president's skull apart. In other words, he said the fatal shot was an accident resulting from the inadvertent discharge of an SS agent's weapon.

In fairness it ought be pointed out the agent in question, whom he named, sued and though his suit was dismissed on procedural grounds (too late), the publisher did settle with him later.

It also should be pointed out he thought Oswald was guilty of trying to kill Kennedy but not the fatal shot.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Donahue

So there you are, FWIW.


We shall never be abandoned by Heaven while we act worthy of its aid ~~ Samuel Adams

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 71,613
  • Gender: Female
My husband who was on the Naval rifle team (traveled to meets winning shooting awards) always said he did not believe Oswald was the actual shooter.  Like the book you cite Cin, he didn't think it was possible for someone who was not the best of the best to get off those shots....... and then there is the so-called path the magic bullet traveled to come out unscathed... were any of us supposed to buy that story?  Like Bigun said, that bullet was planted.
�The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.� G Washington July 2, 1776

Offline Cincinnatus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,513
Ok, after I posted I read Rapunzel's contribution and now want to say something about it.

Next to Menninger's book the idea the Mob offed Kennedy with Oswald the probable triggerman is my next favorite; but, I'm thinking, for different reasons than were presented in her post (I acknowledge she didn't say those things but was citing a book on the subject0.

(1) The Kennedys were deeply in bed with the Mob. The old man had made part of the family fortune by dealing in bootleg liquor in alliance with the Mob during Prohibition. When Jack ran for Prez mafia money, muscle, and support was the primary reason he won the WV primary which supposedly showed the Catholic Northeastener Kennedy could win in a largely Protestant, southern state. In the general election the Mafia delivered Chicago for Kennedy and so he won IL. The Kennedys owed the Mob, a debt that had to be honored.

(2) Bobby has a reputation as a big time mob buster but about the only guy he took down was Jimmy Hoffa and that, true to Bobby's vindictive personality, was due to his hatred of Jimmy, not Hoffa's criminal activities. Jimmy was the Mob's guy in the Teamsters which was a cash cow for the Mafia. By attacking Jimmy and the Teamsters that self-righteous prig Bobby stepped on the wrong toes, I think. It's true he sort of went after Marcello but only to degrade him, a stupid act, and never put him or any other top Mafioso in jail. After Jimmy was removed, the Teamsters returned to business as usual.

(3) I find it rather curious that after the assassination Bobby didn't demand a thorough investigation. How unlike him, especially given it involved his brother with whom he was truly quite close. I can only assume he couldn't do so because if he had the entire story of his family's close association with the Mafia would have to have been brought forth. Discretion was the better part of valor, he already knew what really happened, so let Oswald take the blame. 
We shall never be abandoned by Heaven while we act worthy of its aid ~~ Samuel Adams

Offline Cincinnatus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,513
This belief I share with Bigun and Rapunzel. Like Bigun said, that bullet was planted.

What a farce.
We shall never be abandoned by Heaven while we act worthy of its aid ~~ Samuel Adams

Offline DCPatriot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 45,963
  • Gender: Male
  • "...and the winning number is...not yours!
Frank Sinatra and Dean Martin went to The Godfather and requested the hit on JFK....in retribution for Jack and Robert's treatment and murder of Marilyn Monroe.


.....don't laugh....it's as good as any of the other theories.


As stated....in broad daylight in a major city with hundreds of eyewitnesses, people still wonder 50 years later WTF happened.

And then you see that people say that the Towers falling on 9-11 was an inside job and the Building #7 fell in a free-fall all by itself.

Oh.....and that no airplane hit the Pentagon.   Even though 500 people on the George Washington Parkway and on 395 saw it.
"It aint what you don't know that kills you.  It's what you know that aint so!" ...Theodore Sturgeon

"Journalism is about covering the news.  With a pillow.  Until it stops moving."    - David Burge (Iowahawk)

"It was only a sunny smile, and little it cost in the giving, but like morning light it scattered the night and made the day worth living" F. Scott Fitzgerald

Offline Cincinnatus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,513
Not laughing. Could be. Frank Sinatra and Dean Martin went to The Godfather and requested the hit on JFK....in retribution for Jack and Robert's treatment and murder of Marilyn Monroe.

I shall now give you my own theory. Jackie did it.

Yep. She got fed up with that randy goat's constant infidelities and, to deal with it, hired Lee Harvey in order to show her displeasure.

Hey, you know women and what they are capable of when their man cheats, and did JFK ever cheat.

I am working on my book with this theme even as we speak.
We shall never be abandoned by Heaven while we act worthy of its aid ~~ Samuel Adams

Offline Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51,470
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
Well here's another one for the whatever it's worth category.

In late 1966 and for most of 1967 I was in the U.S Army in a land about as far away from Dallas Texas as one can get on this globe working mostly working with fellows who worked for a government agency that few knew much about in those days. In the course of that tour I, late at night, often found myself sitting around empty cable spools turned on end so as to make a table with all manner of adult beverages thereon. In the course of those conversations I gained many insights to events which had occurred on November 22nd 1963 from people who, I have more than enough reason to believe, knew what they were talking about. Let's just say that they were not pleased with the fact that a number of their colleagues were, at the time, still rotting in Cuban dungeons because a now former president of the United States of America had given them his word that this and that would be provided at the Bay of Pigs but withheld at the very hour they were most needed...
« Last Edit: April 03, 2013, 12:35:33 am by Bigun »
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien

Offline DCPatriot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 45,963
  • Gender: Male
  • "...and the winning number is...not yours!
Well here's another one for the whatever it's worth category.

In late 1966 and for most of 1967 I was in the U.S Army in a land about as far away from Dallas Texas as one can get on this globe working mostly working with fellows who worked for a government agency that few knew much about in those days. In the course of that tour I, late at night, often found myself sitting around empty cable spools turned on end so as to make a table with all manner of adult beverages thereon. In the course of those conversations I gained many insights to events which had occurred on November 22nd 1963 from people who, I have more than enough reason to believe, knew what they were talking about. Let's just say that they were not pleased with the fact that a number of their colleagues were, at the time, still rotting in Cuban dungeons because a now former president of the United States of America had given them his word that this and that would be provided at the Bay of Pigs but withheld at the very hour they were most needed...


That sounds the most realistic to me.....that it had to do with the double cross at the Bay of Pigs.

OTOH....I do believe Oswald was a shooter, but not the only one.   I like the 'grassy knoll' theory.

Also...in the Zapruder movie of the assassination, it's said that they have clear evidence of a bullet or something hitting a roadway sign as the sign begins to shake violently while everything else in the frame is 'normal'.

Did anybody else hear about this?
"It aint what you don't know that kills you.  It's what you know that aint so!" ...Theodore Sturgeon

"Journalism is about covering the news.  With a pillow.  Until it stops moving."    - David Burge (Iowahawk)

"It was only a sunny smile, and little it cost in the giving, but like morning light it scattered the night and made the day worth living" F. Scott Fitzgerald