Author Topic: Special ops to feel budget pain, leaders say  (Read 1361 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 382,800
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Special ops to feel budget pain, leaders say
« on: January 30, 2013, 01:26:07 am »
http://www.militarytimes.com/news/2013/01/dn-special-operations-budget-pain-012913/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Special ops to feel budget pain, leaders say

By Paul McLeary - Staff writer
Posted : Tuesday Jan 29, 2013 19:21:49 EST

The potential budget hit produced by sequestration and the possibility that Congress uses another continuing resolution to fund the Pentagon for the rest of 2013 may hit the U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) hard, the command’s leadership told an industry conference in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday.

SOCOM commander Adm. William McRaven warned the audience at the National Defense Industrial Association Special Operations conference that if Congress passes another continuing resolution to fund the Pentagon through the remainder of 2013, his Special Operations Command would likely lose about $1 billion in funding.

The continuing resolution “puts a greater constraint on us than I think sequestration will,” McRaven said, adding that “we don’t know what sequestration is going to look like, but there is an expectation that it is clearly going to be an additional bill on top of that.”

Whatever the cut might be, however, he assured the crowd that his command’s first priority will always be to protect SOCOM’s ability to fight, saying, “we want to make sure first and foremost that we protect our war-fighting capability. And we will do that.”

McRaven’s concerns were echoed by Maj. Gen. Michael Repass, the commander of SOCOM’s European command.

Repass warned that his command could stand to lose about 23 percent of its funding this year to conduct Building Partner Capacity (BPC) operations under a continuing resolution. This would translate into “somewhere on the order of 25 percent-plus less BPC activity this year” in his area of operations, he said, which includes special operations forces in Eastern Europe as well as with allies battling powerful drug cartels shipping heroin and cocaine from Africa.

While no one is predicting disaster for the special operations community, the current economic situation means that “we’ve come to the point where the open checkbook approach to SOF is past” added Garry Reid, principal deputy assistant secretary of defense, special operations/low intensity conflict.

While acknowledging the obvious resource challenges in the near term, Reid also said that plans to continue to grow SOCOM to 70,000 operators and enablers remains on track, and that the command is working to “reconcile and continue to ensure that we can sustain the readiness” in this expanded force, while being careful to ensure that special operations leaders don’t become “overly dependent” on supplemental war funding, which will decrease over the next several years.

No matter how much money SOCOM has, McRaven said, his command will continue to remain forward postured, because in order to be effective, special operators “have to have that persistent presence” with partners around the globe.
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

famousdayandyear

  • Guest
Re: Special ops to feel budget pain, leaders say
« Reply #1 on: January 30, 2013, 01:52:02 am »
Eyes on Adm William McRaven.  He's too expert and accomplished to survive under the current cic.  Only wimps (ie John Allen) need apply 

Offline Ford289HiPo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 987
  • Don't take life seriously; No one gets out alive
Re: Special ops to feel budget pain, leaders say
« Reply #2 on: January 30, 2013, 01:55:59 am »
Bah! They're politicking for dollars. It that want to save money, get rid of the 4th battalion in each group. Return to the 3 battalion per SF Group TO&E. Drop a few of those GO slots. SF Training Group does not need to be a General Officer billet. For years, it was effectively led by an O6.

Oh yeah, they probably need to stop buying all those expensive toys also. That started in the late 90's, and has continued ever since. Instead of having a "new" rifle, stick with the M4. They don't need the newest, latest, greatest "James Bond/Ninja/Navy SEAL/Delta Force gear to do the job.
I wonder when the lies will stop and truth begin, even as grim as the truth may be. And then I remember that for 70 years, the reign of terror in Russia called itself "the people's government." We have so far to fall, yet we are falling fast and Hell yawns to receive us.

famousdayandyear

  • Guest
Re: Special ops to feel budget pain, leaders say
« Reply #3 on: January 30, 2013, 02:12:10 am »
Bah! They're politicking for dollars. It that want to save money, get rid of the 4th battalion in each group. Return to the 3 battalion per SF Group TO&E. Drop a few of those GO slots. SF Training Group does not need to be a General Officer billet. For years, it was effectively led by an O6.

Oh yeah, they probably need to stop buying all those expensive toys also. That started in the late 90's, and has continued ever since. Instead of having a "new" rifle, stick with the M4. They don't need the newest, latest, greatest "James Bond/Ninja/Navy SEAL/Delta Force gear to do the job.

I'm not gonna tell McRaven what he needs/doesn't need.    Isn't he the one who does all that Navy SEAL/Delta Force stuff with SpecOps thingys?  And I like him--that means he won't be around for long.   You are not a fan, I get that

Offline Ford289HiPo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 987
  • Don't take life seriously; No one gets out alive
Re: Special ops to feel budget pain, leaders say
« Reply #4 on: January 30, 2013, 02:59:20 am »
I'm not gonna tell McRaven what he needs/doesn't need.    Isn't he the one who does all that Navy SEAL/Delta Force stuff with SpecOps thingys?  And I like him--that means he won't be around for long.   You are not a fan, I get that

I'm not a fan of the spending and the constant "need" for more flag officer slots. I went through SF Training Group (the Q-Course) in 87-88, and it was commanded by a Colonel. Now, it's a GO slot doing the same thing.
I wonder when the lies will stop and truth begin, even as grim as the truth may be. And then I remember that for 70 years, the reign of terror in Russia called itself "the people's government." We have so far to fall, yet we are falling fast and Hell yawns to receive us.