Author Topic:  (Read 1889 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline R4 TrumPence

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 13,424
« on: November 02, 2012, 11:39:30 PM »


I am Repub4Bush on FR '02

Offline Oceander

  • Technical
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 47,384
  • Chief Dork
« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2012, 11:41:27 PM »
Time to turn him in.  They've got a name, specific locations in which crimes were committed, and should be able to make an arrest and prosecute to conviction.  Unless of course the police and/or the prosecutor are democrats, in which case he'll probably end up with a commendation.
« Last Edit: November 02, 2012, 11:41:49 PM by Oceander »

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 71,719
« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2012, 11:42:33 PM »
My goodness you would think Romney was going to put women back in chastity belts.

Offline Allegra

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,378
« Reply #3 on: November 02, 2012, 11:45:52 PM »
Not only is his announcement that he's pulling an illegal stunt incredibly stupid, but it appears he has also overdosed on the Kool-Aid.

The Clueless Self-Righteous flavor, no less.
Don not wait to. There was not the shadow of the wall and another shade of eye gaze, we don not go Nvragr not find the light went shadow Nnvr.

Offline speekinout

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,337
« Reply #4 on: November 02, 2012, 11:51:01 PM »
Time to turn him in.  They've got a name, specific locations in which crimes were committed, and should be able to make an arrest and prosecute to conviction.  Unless of course the police and/or the prosecutor are democrats, in which case he'll probably end up with a commendation.

No, they don't have a "name". There's no way to know what names he used for voting. Certainly since he voted twice in Emerald Isle, he didn't use the same name both times. He can deny he did it, and no one can prove anything different.

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 71,719
« Reply #5 on: November 02, 2012, 11:52:14 PM »
Someone on FOX yesterday said all they do is look up the name of the dead, show up and vote as that person and since he or she is dead they don't complain.

Offline Oceander

  • Technical
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 47,384
  • Chief Dork
« Reply #6 on: November 02, 2012, 11:55:51 PM »
No, they don't have a "name". There's no way to know what names he used for voting. Certainly since he voted twice in Emerald Isle, he didn't use the same name both times. He can deny he did it, and no one can prove anything different.

You have clear evidence of illegal activity.  That will be sufficient for a subpoena to get the account information for the twitter account's owner.  That gives you a live person who has already make an admission against interest that he committed voter fraud.  That statement, by itself, is admissible as evidence - it is an exception to the rule that excludes hearsay.  Once you have the person, you have a face; take that face to the relevant polls and see if anyone recognizes that face.  If they do, then you have further evidence that he in fact committed voter fraud.  Since, presumably, the state office that determines election results does not have to find voter fraud by the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard, the vote counts from each of those polling places can be reduced by one to take into account his fraud.  He can then be prosecuted for voter fraud - where the higher standard of proof will, of course, be used - and if a jury of his "peers" - as a technical matter - find him guilty, then he gets punished.


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf