James Woods, 71, calls Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, 29, 'the most dangerous person in America' after he

[mystery-ak]

James Woods, 71, calls Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, 29, 'the most dangerous person in America' after her impassioned speech in the House ridiculing Trump over the shutdown

    Actor Woods tweeted Thursday after Ocasio-Cortez's maiden speech
    Also tweeted a picture of Ocasio-Cortez, who has 2.46m followers on Twitter, saying 'as the inmates attempt to escape the asylum'
    The newly sworn-in congresswoman addressed the House floor for the first time
    In her speech she slammed the President over the partial government shutdown
    As of Friday morning, the C-SPAN video of her speech had reached 2.3m views
    Oscar nominated Woods, who has 1.9m followers on Twitter, is best known for his roles in Ghosts of Mississippi, Salvador and Videodrome
    Called Donald Trump 'the voice of the American people' and said he was dropped by his 'liberal' agent over his political views
    Woods was banned by Twitter over a hoax meme he posted

By George Martin For Mailonline and Lauren Fruen For Dailymail.com

Published: 06:44 EST, 18 January 2019 | Updated: 10:23 EST, 18 January 2019

 


James Woods tweeted that Ocasio-Cortez was the 'most dangerous woman in America'

Fervent Republican James Woods has called Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez 'the most dangerous woman in America' in a post on Twitter. 

Tweeting a picture of the young Democratic congresswoman on Thursday, Oscar nominated Woods, 71, wrote: 'This is the most dangerous person in America right now. Ignore her at your peril...'

He later tweeted 'as the inmates attempt to escape the asylum...' along with a picture of Ocasio-Cortez.

Woods' tweet came just hours after 29-year-old Ocasio Cortez's maiden speech to the House - which instantly became the most viewed Twitter video ever for a representative.

As of Friday morning it had 2.3million views.

more
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6606673/James-Woods-calls-Alexandria-Ocasio-Cortez-dangerous-person-America.html

[jmyrlefuller]

Awaiting the "That's racist/sexist" "clapback" the left and the media will gush over for days on end…

[Cyber Liberty]

Why does The Mail care what their relative ages are?

[goatprairie]

AOC is a moron.  She has a following, but she's not cunning enough by herself ("I have a cunning plan") to cause too much damage.
But the fact that she and a number of other admitted socialists are getting elected shows the dire straits the country is in.
Decades ago nobody would given the odd far leftist/socialist much attention. Now they're coming close to taking over the Dem Party (which has been trending leftwards for fifty years)  and attempting to enact their insane Marxist-inspired ideas.

[mountaineer]

Why does The Mail care what their relative ages are?

That's the oddest thing about this story.

[Smokin Joe]

Why does The Mail care what their relative ages are?

They are playing the same game with "The Generation Gap" that got the Communists their toehold in the Dem Party in the '60s and '70s and has been used to marginalize the wisdom of Conservative elders ever since.

Marxists have ever tapped the restlessness of youth for cannon fodder and useful idiots, and have gone to great lengths to program Marxist values into the young, especially the last two generations.

[Snarknado]

Why does The Mail care what their relative ages are?

Well for one thing Woods has a lot more experience with women in that age bracket than most geezers.

But if AOC is the most dangerous, I really don't think we have much to worry about. People were terrified of 0bama, but the sum total of his "accomplishments" was writing his name at the end of 2000-page wacko bills put in front of him, no more than any no-name liberal lightweight would have "accomplished". Now picture where we'd be if we'd handed a <shudder> president HRC a filibuster-proof Senate - that's a genuine nightmare scenario. AOC is basically just another 0bama except she was never taught to keep her mouth shut unless she was reading her teleprompter. As it is, you can take any "blonde" joke, substitute "AOC" and not have to worry about anyone in your audience not getting it...

[jmyrlefuller]

People were terrified of 0bama, but the sum total of his "accomplishments" was writing his name at the end of 2000-page wacko bills put in front of him, no more than any no-name liberal lightweight would have "accomplished".

It's not the legislation that made him so dangerous. It was the fundamental transformation he caused through his cult of personality. Think of how much the culture has shifted hard left. Compare 2005 to 2017. Moral collapse might be a bit histrionic, but you can't deny that his "cool liberal" vibe led a LOT of people astray.

[Smokin Joe]

Well for one thing Woods has a lot more experience with women in that age bracket than most geezers.

But if AOC is the most dangerous, I really don't think we have much to worry about. People were terrified of 0bama, but the sum total of his "accomplishments" was writing his name at the end of 2000-page wacko bills put in front of him, no more than any no-name liberal lightweight would have "accomplished". Now picture where we'd be if we'd handed a <shudder> president HRC a filibuster-proof Senate - that's a genuine nightmare scenario. AOC is basically just another 0bama except she was never taught to keep her mouth shut unless she was reading her teleprompter. As it is, you can take any "blonde" joke, substitute "AOC" and not have to worry about anyone in your audience not getting it...

I am no more afraid of AOC than any other person, symbol, or flag. Inherently, there is nothing to be afraid of from one person, one design, one piece of cloth.

The banner, the standard is no cause for fear, but what should give all pause is the crowd that waves that banner, that wears that symbol and reveres it, the multitude who follow and support that person.

By himself, one of the most despised figures of the 20th century was a mere corporal, a prison philosopher, a mediocre artist. But with the angry following of millions, the backing of a nation's economy, he became the scourge of continents and responsible for the violent and miserable deaths of 100 million people who might have passed peaceably in their own beds after a long and fruitful life.

I have no fear of the person, object, or symbol such mobs rally around, but the mob, the irrational, emotional, and unthinking multitude, ever is cause for concern. No matter what they profess, never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.

Lest we forget, we have the option, the duty, to say "No.", whatever that may cost.

[Fishrrman]

We should not be afraid of the occasional-communist as much as the reality that her message appeals to an increasingly-large number of young Americans -- and that the size of that cohort shows no sign of reversing...

[goatprairie]

We should not be afraid of the occasional-communist as much as the reality that her message appeals to an increasingly-large number of young Americans -- and that the size of that cohort shows no sign of reversing...

I've read comments here and there by millennials who they think they're the most educated generation ever.  How they can believe that after believing socialism is the cure for whatever ails the country is beyond me.
It's not like we don't have enough examples of failed socialist societies.
I'm sure a number of them believe they can turn America into some sort of Scandinavian socialist utopia, and they'll keep all their goodies created by a capitalist economy.
What we'll end up with would be more like Venezuela.

[DB]

I've read comments here and there by millennials who they think they're the most educated generation ever.  How they can believe that after believing socialism is the cure for whatever ails the country is beyond me.
It's not like we don't have enough examples of failed socialist societies.
I'm sure a number of them believe they can turn America into some sort of Scandinavian socialist utopia, and they'll keep all their goodies created by a capitalist economy.
What we'll end up with would be more like Venezuela.

Being "educated" does not translate to practical knowledge or wisdom. Many idiots think they're smart because the can look something up on Google while having no working understanding of how to apply it - if the information is even accurate.

[austingirl]

Millennials are abysmally ignorant. They think they can know things by looking it up on google. I have a writer friend who recently submitted a book set in the sixties/seventies that included the Kent State massacre. The millennial who passed judgment on his work, declined it, stating that Kent State "would never happen in America." I guess she didn't google that one.

Millennials are the walking talking stupid and are convinced otherwise.

[Smokin Joe]

Being "educated" does not translate to practical knowledge or wisdom. Many idiots think they're smart because the can look something up on Google while having no working understanding of how to apply it - if the information is even accurate.

So true. There is a tremendous amount of information, little knowledge, and even less wisdom.

[Smokin Joe]

Millennials are abysmally ignorant. They think they can know things by looking it up on google. I have a writer friend who submitted a book in the sixties/seventies that included the Kent State massacre. The millennial who passed judgment on his work, declined it, stating that Kent State "would never happen in America." I guess she didn't google that one.

Millennials are the walking talking stupid and are convinced otherwise.

They are bombarded with billions of tidbits of (mostly useless) information.

Within that sandstorm, there are just a few grains of knowledge.

Among those grains, if one looks closely and spends some time considering them, one may find wisdom.


They have mistaken information of knowledge, and believe it makes them wise.