Author Topic: Upcoming changes in marine fuel sulfur limits will affect crude oil and petroleum product markets  (Read 1302 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
Upcoming changes in marine fuel sulfur limits will affect crude oil and petroleum product markets
https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/weekly/
January 16, 2019

In the January 2019 update of its Short-Term Energy Outlook   (STEO), the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) includes the effects that upcoming changes to marine fuel sulfur specifications will have on crude oil and petroleum product markets. Set to go into effect January 1, 2020, the new International Marine Organization (IMO) regulations limit the sulfur content in marine fuels used by ocean-going vessels to 0.5% by weight, a reduction from the previous limit of 3.5% (Figure 1). The change in fuel specification is expected to put upward pressure on diesel margins and modest upward pressure on crude oil prices in late 2019 and early 2020.



Residual oil—the long-chain hydrocarbons remaining after lighter and shorter hydrocarbons such as gasoline and diesel have been separated from crude oil—accounts for the largest component of marine fuels, also known as bunker fuels, used by large ocean-going vessels. Marine vessels account for about 4% of global oil demand. Removing sulfur from residual oils or upgrading them to more valuable lighter products such as diesel and gasoline can be an expensive and capital-intensive process. Refineries have two options for residual oils. They can either invest in more downstream units to upgrade residual oils into more valuable products, or they can process lighter and sweeter crude oils, which produce less residual oils and the sulfur content therein.

EIA expects that once implemented, the new IMO fuel specification will widen discounts between light-sweet crude oil and heavy-sour crude oil grades, while also widening the price spreads between high- and low-sulfur petroleum products. In the January STEO forecast, Brent crude oil spot prices increase from an average of $61 per barrel (b) in 2019 to $65/b in 2020, and about $2.50/b of this increase is attributable to higher demand for light-sweet crude oils that are priced off of Brent.

Because of an increased premium on low-sulfur fuels, EIA expects diesel fuel refining margins will increase from an average of 43 cents per gallon (gal) in 2018 to 48 cents/gal in 2019 and to 65 cents/gal in 2020 (Figure 2). Motor gasoline margins averaged 28 cents/gal in 2018 and will increase slightly to an average of 32 cents/gal by 2020. EIA’s analysis indicates that the price effects that result from implementing this new standard will be most acute in 2020 and will diminish over time. As they maximize production of diesel fuel, refineries will increase distillate fuel refinery yields from an average of 29.5% in 2018 to 29.9% in 2019 to 31.5% in 2020, while motor gasoline yields will fall from an average of 46.9% in 2018 to averages of 46.5% in 2019 and 45.6% in 2020. Residual fuel yields will decrease from an average of 2.4% in 2018 to an average of 2.2% in 2020.



To meet increased demand for low-sulfur fuels, EIA expects that gross inputs into refineries will increase from an average of 17.3 million barrels per day (b/d) in 2018 to a record level of 17.9 million b/d (up 3.6%) on average in 2020. This increase in gross inputs will result in refinery utilization increasing from an average of 92% in 2019 to an average of 96% in 2020. As refiners use discounted higher sulfur fuel oil volumes, unfinished oil inputs into refineries will increase from an average of 0.33 million b/d in 2018 to averages of 0.39 million b/d (an increase of 17.5%) in 2019 and 0.56 million b/d (an increase of 44.6%) in 2020.

U.S. Gulf Coast refineries have significant capacity to process high-sulfur crude and unfinished oils relative to the rest of the world. As a result, the Gulf Coast will continue to import large quantities of heavy-sour crude oils. EIA’s official forecast only includes net imports, and EIA forecasts that crude oil net imports will decline from 5.8 million b/d in 2018 to 4.8 million b/d in 2020. However, because EIA assumes crude oil gross imports in 2020 will remain largely flat from current levels of about 7.5 million b/d, the decrease in overall net imports results largely from an increase in crude oil gross exports. Also, EIA assumes that net imports of unfinished oil will increase from 0.3 million b/d in 2018 to almost 0.6 million b/d in 2020 as Gulf Coast refineries import unfinished oils to run in downstream refining units to produce low-sulfur IMO compliant fuels.

Likewise, refinery production of distillate fuel will increase from an average of 5.18 million b/d in 2018 to 5.32 million b/d (2.7%) in 2019 and 5.92 million b/d (11.3%) in 2020, while residual fuel refinery production will fall from 0.42 million b/d in 2018 to 0.40 million b/d (-5.7%) in 2020. As a result, U.S. distillate fuel net exports are forecast to increase to 1.8 million b/d in 2020, almost 0.6 million b/d (57.4%) higher than in 2018, as U.S. refiners export increasing amounts of IMO-compliant fuel to global bunkering hubs.

Because two of the largest bunkering ports are outside of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), marine distillate use in non-OECD countries will likely increase through 2020. Likewise, high-sulfur residual fuel oil currently used for bunkering fuel will likely decline. Also, EIA does not expect a significant switch to liquefied natural gas (LNG) in 2020 as a result of the regulation because of a lack of sufficient infrastructure to support LNG as a shipping fuel. EIA does not anticipate the regulations will have a significant effect on total global liquid fuels consumption in 2020. The switch from highly energy-dense residual fuel to marine distillate will likely result in an increase in total liquid fuels consumption of no more than 0.1 million b/d (0.1%) because using less energy-dense fuel will require some increase in volume to serve an equivalent level of shipping traffic.

Based on the most recent data available, U.S. consumption of bunker fuel was about 0.3 million b/d, and EIA expects the overall effect on product supplied to be very small. In the bunker market, a modest shift from residual fuel use to distillate is likely. However, uncertainty exists regarding the IMO-compliant fuel specification and, in turn, what its supply chain will look like. As a result, the distribution of individual fuels is uncertain.

On January 24, EIA will release its Annual Energy Outlook 2019 with projections through 2050. This analysis will reflect the long-term implications of the new sulfur requirements.
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,746
If I interpret this right, it appears that the restrictive environmental effect from usage of low sulfur fuel for marine causes the US crude production (which is mostly light due to it being unconventional oil) to be more valuable and the heavier crude entering our refineries to be of lesser value.
This looks to be a win/win as our exported crude is more valuable and the refineries margins will increase as its feedstock price is lowered.
No punishment, in my opinion, is too great, for the man who can build his greatness upon his country's ruin~  George Washington

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
If I interpret this right, it appears that the restrictive environmental effect from usage of low sulfur fuel for marine causes the US crude production (which is mostly light due to it being unconventional oil) to be more valuable and the heavier crude entering our refineries to be of lesser value.
This looks to be a win/win as our exported crude is more valuable and the refineries margins will increase as its feedstock price is lowered.

Yes, I read it the same.  It will also put more pressure for use of LNG for marine fuel.
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 56,694
  • I was a "conspiracy theorist". Now I'm just right.
So, essentially, the price split between sweet and sour will grow?
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

C S Lewis

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
So, essentially, the price split between sweet and sour will grow?

Yes, nice that we tend to use the sour and export the sweet.
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,746
Yes, nice that we tend to use the sour and export the sweet.
One of those unintended consequences of the enviro-wackos.  Helping both the domestic upstream and downstream simultaneously.
No punishment, in my opinion, is too great, for the man who can build his greatness upon his country's ruin~  George Washington