Author Topic: The U.S. Military Once Had Nukes That Could Fit in a Backpack  (Read 377 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
The U.S. Military Once Had Nukes That Could Fit in a Backpack

Soldiers trained to carry “special atomic demolition munitions” thought they were readying for suicide missions.
 
By Kyle Mizokami   
Jan 14, 2019
 

They called them “special atomic demolition munitions,” otherwise known as SADMs. What they really amount to were nukes small enough to fit in a backpack.

The U.S. Army and Marine Corps had dozens of these small nukes during the Cold War, and an elite group of soldiers, Marines, and sailors trained to infiltrate enemy lines and use these weapons against important enemy targets—probably frying themselves in the process. The Associated Press just interviewed a veteran of the U.S. Army’s Special Atomic Demolition Munition platoons to find out what it was like to live with the B54 tactical nuclear warhead.

The Go-Anywhere Nuke

https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a25893776/b-54-cold-war-backpack-nuke/
« Last Edit: January 15, 2019, 11:35:33 am by rangerrebew »

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline RetBobbyMI

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,543
  • Gender: Male
Re: The U.S. Military Once Had Nukes That Could Fit in a Backpack
« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2019, 01:39:57 pm »
Who says they now have anything of the sorts?  Nothing pertaining to nukes is either confirmed or denied. Only denied if your Hillary
"Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid."  -- John Wayne
"Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish.� ? Euripides, The Bacchae
"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it.� ? Laurence J. Peter, The Peter Principle
"A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand.� ? Bertrand Russell, A History of Western Philosophy