Here’s why some structures fell in the Alaska earthquake and others didn’t. And how we decided that.
https://www.adn.com/opinions/2018/12/04/heres-why-some-structures-fell-in-the-alaska-earthquake-and-others-didnt-and-how-we-decided-that/...“Some of them, we can just look at the picture in the paper and say, ‘Yep, that’s why that failed,’†said Ross Noffsinger, the acting municipal building official — a job that puts him in charge of enforcing the building code.
In areas where roads cross wetlands, failure can occur when shaking liquefies soils underneath, said Kyle Brennan, who leads geotechnical engineers for Shannon & Wilson in Anchorage and is vice chair of the city’s Geotechnical Advisory Commission.
But that doesn’t necessarily mean anyone made a mistake. Construction that can withstand a strong earthquake may be too expensive for low-hazard infrastructure like roads, which are relatively easy to fix. Engineered facilities that failed may have been built to fail in a quake this strong.
In other cases, however, construction probably should have been better, especially in damaged homes. I doubt it is a coincidence that more housing damage occurred in Eagle River, where building codes are not enforced, than in the Anchorage Bowl. I’ve also heard of damage in Mat-Su, which doesn’t have residential building codes. (It’s also possible more severe shaking was a cause.)
Under Anchorage’s odd form of local government, areas can choose a menu of services. Eagle River never opted into the Building Safety Service Area, where Noffsinger’s office has authority....
- - - - - - - -
We used to live in Eagle River, Alaska.