Where’s the outrage over Hillary’s call for a ‘civil’ war? By Michael Goodwin

[mystery-ak]

Opinion
Where’s the outrage over Hillary’s call for a ‘civil’ war?

By Michael Goodwin

October 9, 2018 | 10:20pm | Updated

Two events from the last two days stand out. The first came Monday night with President Trump’s forceful yet compassionate speech at the swearing in of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.

The president opened with an extraordinary apology on behalf of the country to Kav­anaugh and his family “for the terrible pain and suffering” they endured during the historically brutal confirmation process. He said the unfounded allegations violated fairness and “the presumption of innocence.”

Trump also tenderly addressed Kavanaugh’s young daughters, telling them “your father is a great man, a man of decency, character, kindness and courage.”

The event was something of a spike-the-football moment in front of a cheering White House audience and as such was a clever piece of stagecraft, where Republican Sens. Mitch McConnell, Charles Grassley, Lindsey Graham and Susan Collins were saluted.

more
https://nypost.com/2018/10/09/wheres-the-outrage-over-hillarys-call-for-a-civil-war/

[INVAR]

There was no 'outrage' over her overt treason and crimes when she was in office, so why the hell would we assume there is going to be any 'outrage' over her calls to wage an uncivil war?

Untouchable people say and do what they want without any fear of consequences.  Especially when they have weaponized and corrupted the entirety of government to their cause.

[mountaineer]

These are the outraged.

And that's the long and short of it.

[Silver Pines]

These are the outraged.

And that's the long and short of it.

@mountaineer

Is that a midget with green hair?

[mountaineer]

So it would seem.

[Fishrrman]

I can't understand why Goodwin still calls himself "a democrat"...