Rush: The World Waits: Will She Testify?

[mystery-ak]

The World Waits: Will She Testify?

Sep 20, 2018




RUSH: Okay. So I see where Senator Grassley has given the accuser Christine Blasey Ford until 10 a.m. tomorrow to decide whether or not to show up on Monday; right? Grassley may want to get his new iPhone, may be what that’s about. I’m just kidding. By 10 a.m. tomorrow she’s gotta decide, and all the Democrats go, “Well, they’re bullying here! They’re bullying. You can’t… You can’t bully the accuser in these situations! You can’t do it!” I tell you, folks, Robert Bork once said that we’re “witnessing the end of civilization” while watching the Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill hearings.

His buddy Irving Kristol walked by and said, “What are you doing?” Bork said, “Watching the end of civilization,” and Irving Kristol said, “Yeah, no question about that but at least we can still live well until it all goes kaput.” (chuckling) I think people are starting to get frustrated now because the Republicans have been bent over backwards to tell Ms. Blasey Ford and her supporters that they want to her from her, and the president has been bending over backwards. He said it would be wonderful if she would show up and testify.

But you know, there’s breaking news. There are new details emerging practically by the hour. Here we have the latest. It will unfold before your very eyes and ears as the program does. You know, Byron York had, by the way, a very good little tweet here. As these people are comparing this to Clarence Thomas and Anita Hill, and he points out some things that make it clear we’re not talking about the same thing here. Anita Hill testified. She testified in the hearings in October of 1991 that Thomas harassed her with a pubic hair on a Coke can in 1981.

(interruption) That’s what it was, folks. I mean, Snerdley is bowing his head in there, can’t believe it. Well, I mean, that was the big deal. Remember, the media was going to video stores like Blockbusters trying to figure out secret porn movies that Thomas may have rented. I kid you not. And what was it? There was Long Dong Silver, that’s what it was! Somebody claimed that Justice Thomas had rented Long Dong Silver. (interruption) This is what a Supreme Court confirmation hearing was reduced to.

Anyway, Byron York reminds us that Hill testified in October 1991 that Thomas harassed her in 1991 and ’82. That’s like ten years before, far more recent than Christine Blasey Ford’s 36-year-old charge against Kavanaugh. Also, Hill and Thomas were both adults when the alleged pubic hair was left on the alleged Coke can in the workplace. They were both adults whereas we’re talking about teenagers in high school here with Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford. Now, the Democrats are livid. Grassley…

We were one of the first to point this out yesterday. Grassley even tried to get hold of the accuser and her lawyers, and they’re not responding to him. She, of course, isn’t, but her lawyers are not responding to Grassley. Grassley said (paraphrased), “I’ve tried smoke signals and I’ve tried SOS. I’ve tried Morse code. I’ve tried email. I’ve tried text. I’ve tried SMS. I’ve tried EMS. I’ve tried everything I know to do out there and I can’t get a call-back from them.” So Mazie Hirono from Hawaii — who obviously is seeing this as a moment to raise her national stardom — is starting to utter profanity we’re not used to hearing from senators.

She’s saying (paraphrased), “You go to hell! You go to hell! That is BS,” except she’s not using the initials. And she says, “Grassley, who are you to reach out and contact with woman without any of us know? You can’t do that!” Why, is that bullying, too, the chairman of the committee trying to get hold of the lawyers? Anyway, what Grassley’s offered… This is unprecedented. We were among the first to pass this on to you yesterday that Grassley even offered to take the Senate Judiciary Committee staff to California wherever Christine Blasey Ford is holed up.

And they’re rejecting that. And of course I predicted they would reject it. You know why they reject it? Because they will say she’s in hiding. She’s afraid for her life because wacko Trump supporters are all over her. So this is just Grassley trying to find out where she lives so he can leak it to people and further endanger her. We can’t let Grassley and his staff know where we are. (This is the tone that they are taking.) But it raises some questions. Why does an accuser claiming firsthand knowledge need more time to testify about her story?

What kind of preparation is necessary here? We’re talking about an event that took place in less than seven minutes if it happened. Seven minutes. Maybe not even that long. So what the hell else is there to remember? What really is there to prep for? Is the preparation designed to sound credible when you don’t know what you’re talking about? Is the preparation designed to cover up for periods of time you don’t recall? What could possibly be necessary here? She took a lie detector test. She wrote it all down. She was there.

And her lawyers say she passed the lie detector test that they gave her. The Republicans desperately want to hear from her, and I don’t think this is an act. You have the president saying (summarized), “It’d be wonderful if she showed up. We want to hear what she has to say.” The president said yesterday, “Look, if she shows up and credible, we’re gonna have to rethink this whole thing.” I mean, they’re practically rolling out the red carpet for her. (interruption) What are you frowning at? (interruption) You think it’s a sham? (interruption) You think it’s a track? (interruption) What are you laughing at in there?

They want to talk to her. They want her to show up. They want to hear her story. (interruption) Well, Snerdley says, “So you say the only reason they’re acting eager to hear from her is because they know she’s not coming.” Okay, let me tell you. They know she doesn’t have what? The story? She doesn’t have the details? She doesn’t have the goods? Is that what you’re gonna say, “She doesn’t have what she claims to have”? She’s not gonna show up? That’s what you think? (interruption) Okay. If she doesn’t show up, I’m gonna tell you what’s gonna happen.

I’m telling you right now it’s already in the works with, and I know it’s in the works because I heard a Drive-By Media person talking about it. The Drive-By Media person was Karen Tumulty of the Washington Post who says she wouldn’t be surprised if more women surface over the weekend alleging similar acts by Kavanaugh. She’s just telegraphed that they’re out there trying to find women that they can convince to come forward and say what they want them to say. You know they’re working on that.

You know that the Democrat Party, you know that the media — they’re working in tandem — are scouring women who went to the same school or went to school where Kavanaugh was seen, you know, lurking around and so forth. And they’re gonna try to find as many women — not too many, find one or two women — to come forward and say, “Yeah, I didn’t want to come forward but I watching what’s happening to Christine Blasey Ford, and I can’t stand it.”

So don’t be surprised. That would be the cover if she doesn’t show. (interruption) You’re sitting there thinking that the Republicans and you know she’s not gonna show. Well, that means the Democrats know she’s not gonna show. The Democrats are not gonna let the fact that she doesn’t show kill their effort to wipe out Kavanaugh. So in replacement for her not showing, don’t be surprised, don’t be surprised if later today or tomorrow — sometime before this 10 o’clock tomorrow morning headline — that another woman surfaces.

But I want to remind you one thing. We had audio yesterday from a friend of Christine Blasey Ford. Her name was Guerry, G-u-e-r-r-y. I forget her first name. Doesn’t matter. We played the sound bites, and she was talking about how when they were in school that this kind of thing happened a lot. But not with Kavanaugh! She did not have any firsthand knowledge of anything Kavanaugh did, but she did say that all the boys — a lot of the boys — this is how they behaved. A lot of the boys did.

“You mean Brett Kavanuagh?”

“No, no, no! I — I –”

“She made it so clear she never saw Brett Kavanaugh. She never heard his name in any of this. Well, to me that’s all anybody needs to know if we’ve got a friend of Christine Blasey Ford coming out there trying to establish that Christine Blasey Ford is not making it up. But this woman, this friend of hers went out of her way… Cookie, grab that bite again from yesterday. I mean, no mad dash hurry. Just whenever you get it. She made a point twice in the audio sound bite we played to make sure no, she’s not talking about Brett Kavanaugh here.

There’s also a little bit of news here. There’s a website. There’s a guy that runs a website. I don’t have it right in front of me. I can’t remember the name of the site. I’ll find it here in a second. I’ve not heard of the website before. But I’m gonna go ahead and tell you, the guy running the website claims that he knew that they… He went and looked at the yearbook, the high school yearbook from the year in question here at the yearbook where Christine Blasey Ford went to school.

more
https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2018/09/20/the-world-waits-will-she-testify/