Here’s All The Proof You Need That Democrats Never Cared About Separation Of Illegal Immigrant Child

[Free Vulcan]

On Wednesday, President Trump signed an executive order purportedly attempting to reunify migrant children with illegal immigrant parents while in custody. This separation, supposedly, was the greatest moral crisis afflicting the country in a generation. The Trump administration “zero tolerance” policy was compared with Nazism and Japanese internment; Trump was featured on the cover of Time magazine grinning down smugly at a crying small Central American child.

So when Trump signed the executive order, you’d imagine that Democrats would have celebrated – after all, kids would now be able to stay with their parents, so far as the law allowed!

Instead, Democrats immediately suggested that holding children together with parents was brutal and evil – the same argument civil rights groups made when President Obama pursued the same policy, an argument that ended in a Ninth Circuit ruling mandating the separation of children from parents.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/32146/heres-all-proof-you-need-democrats-never-cared-ben-shapiro

[dfwgator]

The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution.

[rangerrebew]

People seem to have forgotten, liberals in particular, that democrats/liberals went to war in 1861 to retain their "right" to separate slave children from their parents and then SELL them.  That was because the Chief Justice, Roger Taney, ruled blacks had no rights that the white man was bound to observe and they were nothing more than personal property.  Taney, incidentally, was a democrat.  That cost over 600,000 Americans their lives, did untold millions in damages to the south, and left untold numbers with legs or arms amputated.  Since liberals are destroying statues of southern soldiers, it seems they should destroy their allegiance to the party that had the worst record on separating children and parents in the history of America.