Good scientific response, Oceander.
(This is partly why your views are unconvincing ...... too much emotion in your responses here).
Because belief in creationism as a theory is so disreputable that it doesn’t deserve much more than a snicker.
Creationism is so patently inconsistent with the factual record that it takes a monstrous amount of willingness to suspend disbelief to give it any credence.
In point of fact, if one accepts that God created everything as is, then one is forced to the position that God is also a liar, because so much of what exists represents a history - a past - that just didn’t exist if creationism is true. That, of course, is a logical inconsistency because God is not a liar; therefore, creationism must be false.
The fact that evolution cannot provide some pat answer to every question that can be asked is not a knock on it; it is a feature of everything that aspires to be a real theory.
General relativity and quantum physics are both theories that have demonstrated the ability to correctly reflect reality to an almost unprecedented extent, and yet the two are mutually exclusive in certain respects and neither can contain the other.
That does not demonstrate that those theories are wrong, merely that more work remains to be done to find theory that encompasses both.
