Sen. Lindsey Graham Tells IG Horowitz, 'I'm Not Buying It'

[endicom]

PJ Media
Debra Heine
June 18, 2018

Senator Lindsey Graham (R- SC) on Monday directly challenged the Justice Department inspector general's conclusion that there was no "documentary evidence" to prove that political bias affected the federal investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server.

"I'm not buying that the Clinton email investigation was on the up and up," Graham told DOJ I.G. Michael Horowitz during his appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee to discuss his 568-page report.

Graham, like other Republicans,  focused on the contents of an Aug. 8, 2016, exchange of texts between FBI lovebirds Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, in which Strzok, the lead investigator in the Clinton probe, had indicated that he could prevent then-candidate Donald Trump from getting elected.

More... https://pjmedia.com/video/sen-lindsey-graham-tells-ig-horowitz-im-not-buying-it/

[endicom]

This could be seen as a grilling of Horowitz or as giving him reason to proceed.

[Right_in_Virginia]

Graham's questioning yesterday was pretty good.  (Video below)  My question to Graham is:  what are you going to do about it?

! No longer available




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpGIrDd--H8&app=desktop

[WingNot]

 Lindsey Graham Tells IG Horowitz, 'I'm Not Buying It'

I didn't even know it was for sale?

[Bigun]

I believe that the FBI is charged with doing investigation(s) and that DOJ prosecutors are charged with determining whether or not the evidence collected by the FBI in any given case warrants prosecution.  If I am correct in that,  I would very much appreciate someone explaining to me how it is possible to have patently obviously biased investors collect or not evidence, present that evidence to prosecutors who make determinations based on the evidence gathered by the very biased investigators and then say those determinations were not influenced by  the bias of the investors!