Author Topic: Brookings Institute: How do we prevent ISIS 2.0? Withdrawing from Syria is not the answer  (Read 448 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TomSea

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40,432
  • Gender: Male
  • All deserve a trial if accused
Quote
How do we prevent ISIS 2.0? Withdrawing from Syria is not the answer
Pavel K Baev, Ryan Crocker, and Michael E. O'Hanlon

American and international strategy towards the horrific conflict in Syria is at a crossroads. ISIS has been largely defeated militarily on the physical battlefield. The top goal of both President Obama and President Trump has been partially achieved, through a strategy they both helped develop and implement. The temptation for Americans in general, and the Trump administration specifically, may be to declare victory and go home—as in fact Trump has just signaled he would like to do, as soon as possible.

That would not be a good idea. Trump deserves credit for his success in Syria, but it represents an interim goal, not a durable achievement. Withdrawing U.S. forces, security assistance, economic aid and diplomatic engagement risks allowing a war that has killed half a million and displaced 12 million to continue—or worse, to expand into a truly regional war. It means that 5 million refugees would remain abroad, continuing to place enormous strains on Turkey, Jordan and Lebanon in particular. It also means that pockets of terrorists would remain intact in several parts of the country, and that Washington would be poorly positioned to manage intensifying Israeli anxieties about Iran’s long-range plans in Syria. Meanwhile, Syria would lie in waste, with many of its communities destroyed beyond functionality. That would produce ongoing anger and resentment among the country’s majority Sunnis in particular, conditions that could give rise to ISIS 2.0. A premature American withdrawal would also concede and condemn even more of the country back to the murderous President Bashar al-Assad and his Iranian allies. Our allies who fought to defeat ISIS on the ground could suffer severe retaliation as their positions were overrun.

Read more at: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2018/04/07/how-do-we-prevent-isis-2-0-withdrawing-from-syria-is-not-the-answer/

I hate to think we are in the long haul for this, credit where credit is due, during this Presidency, ISIS has been largely defeated in Syria... I hope the "mopping" up can be done mainly by our Arab allies.

Online Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,698
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
The current isis is now in a state of "hudna" -- strategic retreat and regrouping.

They may eventually reappear in numbers strong enough to go on the offensive again.

But... it doesn't matter whether isis regroups or not.

There will always be a new cadre of islamic jihadis stepping up under one name or another.
Wipe today's jihadis out, and new ones will spring from the ground.
It's what islam... is.