Author Topic: Federal appeals court rejects 'racial profiling' argument  (Read 155 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Federal appeals court rejects 'racial profiling' argument
« on: March 15, 2018, 10:54:13 am »
March 14, 2018
Federal appeals court rejects 'racial profiling' argument
By Thomas Lifson

A favorite argument of progressives against many laws disproportionately violated by minorities has been rejected as Texas's ban on sanctuary cities has been unanimously upheld by a three-judge panel of a federal court of appeals.  Reversing a federal judge in San Antonio who had blocked implementation of Texas's ban on sanctuary cities, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld most of the law.  As a result, Texas now "requires police chiefs and sheriffs to cooperate with federal immigration officials, and allows the police to question the immigration status of anyone they arrest."

One element of the law, however, was  held unconstitutional:

Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/03/federal_appeals_court_rejects_racial_profiling_argument.html#ixzz59oVtfCKg