Author Topic: Liberals' Sudden Concern About Bill Clinton's Behavior Is Cynical  (Read 174 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline EasyAce

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,385
  • Gender: Male
  • RIP Blue, 2012-2020---my big, gentle friend.
The dynamics that led to Democrats protecting him haven't changed.
By David Harsanyi
http://reason.com/archives/2017/11/17/liberals-sudden-concern-about-bill-clint/print

Quote
A number of notable liberals have recently decided to start taking allegations of sexual assault
against former President Bill Clinton seriously. Let's just say that discarding the Clintons when they're
no longer politically useful in order to retroactively grab the higher moral ground isn't exactly an act
of heroism. But if we're going to relitigate history, let's get it right.

In The New York Times, for example, Michelle Goldberg spends around 75 percent of her column titled
"I Believe Juanita" rationalizing why it was OK not to believe Juanita Broaddrick, who credibly accused
Bill Clinton of rape decades ago. You won't be surprised to learn that Goldberg claims the politics and
conspiracymongering of conservatives provoked skepticism among liberals—excuses that will be awfully
familiar to anyone following the justification of Republican Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore's
supporters.

The most notable problem with Goldberg's contention is that the Broaddrick allegation was uncovered
by NBC News, not Richard Scaife. Well, specifically, it was uncovered by NBC News after the network
sat on the story throughout the president's impeachment proceedings. According to the network, the
story had to be put through an arduous fact-checking process that included figuring out where Clinton
had been the day of the alleged rape—something that had been worked out in a few days' time . . .

. . . Although it wasn't said aloud often, the actions of the entire Democratic Party confirmed [reporter
Nina] Burleigh's position, in spirit if not in action. The Clintons were counting on it. An unhealthy
veneration for presidents and a deep disdain for the other side induces people to rationalize the worst
kind of votes. It is the same calculus some partisans use when defending Moore or Sen. Bob Menendez
(D–N.J.). But it takes no "courage" to speak up later—certainly not decades later; certainly not when
your purpose is transparently partisan. This isn't a reckoning as much as it is a face-saving.


"The question of who is right is a small one, indeed, beside the question of what is right."---Albert Jay Nock.

Fake news---news you don't like or don't want to hear.