Stop playing the drama queen. It's simple as can be - exercise complete freedom in deciding whether or not you'll bake wedding cakes. If you do, then serve the customers who've come in for the service you've said you'd provide.
It's really just a matter of being decent and honorable. Even Christians can manage that, I would think.
Obviously you don't like what I say because it brings out the hypocritical inconsistency of your position. You're not going to pull your little liberal framing garbage on me. This is a broad issue that isn't just about not baking a wedding cake for gays.
By that token then a vendor has no right to express their morality, but their customers can express any morality they choose, as long as the are a govt protected grievance group. Those that aren't don't get that right. A very unequal application of the 14th amendment, and a violation of the Separation of Church and State.
Which is even more egregious in the case of transsexuals and public accomodation. Transsexualism is a BELIEF with no basis in science. Yet the govt has chosen to not only honor that BELIEF but exclude other beliefs and identities as not having the same rights. For example those who identify as transspecies, transracial, or transageist. Furthermore anyone who's BELIEF disagrees with a transsexual's BELIEF is given a lesser status of rights, even there is no science to back a transsexual's claims.
That extends to wedding services such as cakes. By your logic me as the baker should honor two transsexuals' marriage to each other, even though it is nothing but a BELIEF, yet somehow that BELIEF overrides my BELIEF.
How exactly is that not govt sponsored inequality and the State playing Church and deciding morality?
