skeeter wrote (perceptively):
"There was already a term for them - white supremacists.
The reason the left is shifting to 'white nationalist' now is it now can be used to cover far more opinions the left finds odious, such as constitutional originalists."
You've got that right.
Who they REALLY intend to demonize are not white "supremacists".
They're not "white nationalists", either.
They're just... whites.
I'm not opposed to the right-wing marches and demonstrations.
It's been a long time coming. I hope they can keep their cool, though.
In Charlottesville, the alt-righters totally outclassed the antifa leftists, like it or not.
This is the inevitable response to decades of dragging down Western culture, a culture that was created almost totally by the white folks. It's a result of decades of whites being discriminated against through government-sponsored affirmative action programs. Its the result of decades of the mass media doing as much as it can to aid and abet those of the left who would tear things down and misrepresent who and what America is, and where that traditional America came from.
It certainly does no good for the right to have the KKK'ers and Amero-nazis showing up, but it would do less good to try to ban them, which would only strengthen the leftists' cause and further enable their goal -- which is ultimately to silence conservatives in particular and whites in general.
So... let them march and gather.
Don't celebrate them, but do defend their right to free assembly.
It's the left that wants to take that away.
Do we really want to HELP them win?
