Discuss, name an issue or then, let's see that once again, it's the Conspiracy Theories who come up with absolutely NOTHING at all.
It's fine to say others don't know what they are talking about.
Freaking prove it.
I'll bet as usual, we have a few threads, a few facts but nothing airtight, little at all.
I'll grant that there are some mysterious deaths seemingly with the JFK assassination but in the end, it boils down to nothing.
The same can be said for some Mafia crime boss admitting to killing JFK, over UFOs really?
If this "alternative realities" is all bunkum, than I am out of here. I'm not here just to throw stones or say others don't know of what they speak.
Flush it, that's all we've got. N-O-T-H-I-N-G that proves it. Just say others don't know. I guess this area really is fringe if we are saying JFK was assassinated because he was going to talk of UFOs. That more or less, strains credibility.
http://www.openminds.tv/watergates-hunt-allegedly-believed-kennedy-assassination-tied-to-alien-revelations/34273
"Watergate’s Hunt allegedly believed Kennedy assassination tied to alien revelations"
Maybe under general, I will open up earnest discussion of the issue.
I believe that credible, well-sourced personal reports--particularly of participants, eye-witnesses ... is pretty reasonable proof of a deep conspiracy data point.
It is the nature of TRUE conspiracies to be extremely difficult to prove.
That is NOT the same as "PROOF" of their falseness.
It is a fact {personal communication by the world's expert--my boss ~1967} that the very flaky fringe groups were the first, earliest and MOST accurate about who Hitler would become and what he would do. They did not have stacks of scientific "PROOF" either. But they were absolutely correct in most all that they asserted about him.
"Objective Scientific Proof" has become, imho, a straw dog, a Cardinal Doctrine of the most holy church of the Religion of Scientism. And it is a deceptive strategy.
It purports to be the only purveyor of the absolute truest truly true truth.
Yet, the Religion of Scientism itself is replete with horrific, off the wall stupidities BLOCKING and preventing publication of even hard scientific proof--truth--sometimes for decades.
Even in this late era, corporate money manipulates scientific journal publishing of "truth" 6 ways to Sonday. Very OFTEN, such 'scientific truth' turns out to be just what the stockholders of those paying for the research want it to turn out to be.
And scientists who want to publish a new finding--but one which doesn't exactly flatter the status quo--are prevented from publishing ... and often ran out of academia on a rail for daring to think that absolutely objective scientific proof is preferable to the GROUP THINK of the Religion of Scientism.
No, I will not suck at the sugar-tit of objective scientific proof as the only purveyor of absolutely truly truest truth. It is FAR too unreliable for such adoration to be remotely fitting.
There are basically TWO routes to discovery of truth:
1. The HEBREW method, strategy--as in Adam KNEW Eve--became one with her physically etc. ... phenomenologically--immersion, integration, participant observer etc.
2. The GREEK method, strategy--dissect a thing down to its smallest parts. I suspect your spouse would have a strong bias as to which strategy you chose to know the TRUTH of their person and body.
My dissertation used both strategies and was far more robust than average because of it.
The UFO field is certainly replete with phenomenologically derived data points. The public square has not had the opportunity to get a UFO or any part of it--except for some relatively tiny samples--under the microscope. Now, it turns out that the tiny samples were exotic, indeed. And that the properties of those tiny samples were a bit startling. But that's another story.
Until looming history future affords John Q Public the chance to get the UFO stuff under a microscope; to 'kick the tires' ... there will not be MUCH of the sort of proof you seem so demanding about.
That, however, is NOT the same as being totally clueless or ignorant about the topic. You seem to EQUATE non-scientific routes to knowledge about conspiracies and UFOs etc with NOT KNOWING ANYTHING at all, whatsoever.
imho,
That's unwise, uninformed, ignorant.We know a wealth of information about UFOs as well as about the true globalist conspiracy.
The latter, we have many dozens of quotes of the globalists in their own words over the last 100-200 years. They laid out more or less exactly what they were going to do en-route to a tyrannical overt global government and they have largely done exactly those things. Why anyone is so uninformed as to call it a 'conspiracy
theory' is beyond me. ... except that they've been chug-a-lugging on the oligarchy's abundant Kool-Aid.
I love reading your posts. I find them interesting and usually bright and informed.
However, I'm disappointed in the one I'm replying to. I think you can do far better.
We live in a super critical era. The evidence indicates it IS the Biblical END TIMES era when history as we have known it for millennia will forever change.
The suffering will be unprecedented. As The Book declares--if the days weren't shortened, no flesh would be saved.
The abundant evidence is on every hand and plenty of billboards--so to speak.
Yet, I know of prophecy believing Christians who pretend it's all fables and useless, "unproven" theories.
What terminal blindness. They and their families will suffer more than necessary for their arrogant stubborn denial of relatively proven REALITIES.
Countless murderers have been sentenced to execution on the basis of excellent testimony--and reasonably so. . . . often less testimony and less quality testimony than is available in redundant measures in the UFO field.
Ignoring such reasonably solid evidence, is, to me idiotic.
And I no longer have a great deal of patience with such cluelessness.
Life is too short.
Time is too short.
We MUST work while there is 'light' to work in for the looming descending darkness and night is rushing toward us.
= = =
As to globalism--this site has abundant proofs for any fair-minded person to thoughtfully ponder and grow wiser from:
http://www.globalistagenda.org/
.
