Author Topic: Prelude: a new era for LNG? {world’s largest ever offshore facility}  (Read 1876 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
Prelude: a new era for LNG?
http://www.hellenicshippingnews.com/prelude-a-new-era-for-lng/
27/07/2017

Prelude, the world’s largest floating LNG vessel, has arrived in Australia.

Shell, the developer and operator, has sounded the trumpets and declared it “a new era for the LNG industry.” Indeed, it may be, but this is a very expensive way to produce LNG and one that is operationally unproven.
The world’s first FLNG vessel, developed and operated by Malaysia’s Petronas, the PFLNG Satu facility on the Kanowit gas field, only loaded its first cargo in April. It has yet to ramp up to full production.

Moreover, it is a much smaller beast than Prelude. PFLNG Satu will operate in 70-200 meters of water and has a processing capacity of 1.2 million mt/year of LNG.

Prelude, by contrast, will displace more water than six of the world’s largest aircraft carriers, and is the world’s largest ever offshore facility.

It will produce 5.3 million mt/year of liquids, of which 3.6 million mt/year will be LNG, 1.3 million mt/year condensate and 0.4 million mt/year LPG.

It will operate in 250 meters of water and experience category 5 cyclones over its 20-25 year forecast life, when it is expected to “shelter in place”.

Racking up the costs

No one is throwing around precise numbers for the final cost, which is never a good sign. A “brought in under budget” announcement would surely have been made, if it could have been.
First-of-a-kind technologies, particularly on this scale, are rarely cheap. Prelude’s cost has been estimated by external observers at between $10.8 billion and $12.6 billion....
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
It’s here! Shell’s $12b floating gas Goliath arrives in WA
https://thewest.com.au/business/oil-gas/its-here-shells-12b-floating-gas-goliath-arrives-in-wa-ng-b88547909z

Video at link

Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
« Last Edit: July 27, 2017, 03:33:37 pm by thackney »
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
PRELUDE FLNG IN NUMBERS
http://www.shell.com/about-us/major-projects/prelude-flng/prelude-flng-in-numbers.html

Prelude FLNG is the largest offshore floating facility ever built.

>600
engineers worked on the facility's design options

>200km (125 miles)
is the distance from the Prelude field to the nearest land

4 soccer fields,
laid end to end, would be shorter than the facility's deck

175 Olympic-sized swimming pools
could hold the same amount of liquid as the facility’s storage tanks

6,700 horsepower
thrusters will be used to position the facility

50 million litres
of cold water will be drawn from the ocean every hour to help cool the natural gas

6 of the largest aircraft carriers
would displace the same amount of water as the facility

93 metres (305 feet)
is the height of the turret that runs through the facility, secured to the seabed by mooring lines

-162° Celsius (-260° Fahrenheit)
is the temperature at which natural gas turns into LNG

1/600
is the factor by which a volume of natural gas shrinks when it is turned into LNG

117% of Hong Kong's annual natural gas demand
could be met by the facility's annual LNG production

20-25 years
is the time the Prelude FLNG facility will stay at the location to develop gas fields
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline endicom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,113
It should be named the Flying Dutchman.

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
It should be named the Flying Dutchman.

While true it will never come to port, I'm thinking the "portent of doom" and "crewed by the dead" were images Shell didn't want associated with it.
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,746
Prelude: a new era for LNG?

Quote
Shell, the developer and operator, has sounded the trumpets and declared it “a new era for the LNG industry.” Indeed, it may be, but this is a very expensive way to produce LNG and one that is operationally unproven.
While I have no end of criticism for What I consider to be a snotty-nosed company, I do have admiration for Shell's ability to get out in front on the next era of technological advances coming down the road.  It did this in being the front runner in developments on deep water in the GOM(very successfully), in the first commercial-scale Gas-to-liquids plant(very unsuccessfully) and now with large-scale LNG liquefaction floating facilities.

Much of the world's stranded natural gas (i.e. - no access to pipeline) exists in 3rd world countries where it remains a risky proposition to construct such enormous facilities permanently as LNG requires as fixtures, or exists in areas deemed 'environmentally-sensitive' such as Australia where an onshore LNG project like Gorgon takes 40 years to clear these hurdles to get going and requires much more capital to construct.

This is solving a lot of both problems, and eliminates items such as onshore storage, ports for tankers, etc.

Sure it is expensive, but there are many benefits, which include the security of equipment and personnel being outside the easy range of insurgents(think Nigeria or Angola), like every other ocean-going vessel.


Quote
It will produce 5.3 million mt/year of liquids, of which 3.6 million mt/year will be LNG, 1.3 million mt/year condensate and 0.4 million mt/year LPG.
that is huge, as it is larger Than many land LNG liquefaction plants

Quote
It will operate in 250 meters of water and experience category 5 cyclones over its 20-25 year forecast life, when it is expected to “shelter in place”.
I would certainly not wish to ride out a category five on that vessel.
No punishment, in my opinion, is too great, for the man who can build his greatness upon his country's ruin~  George Washington

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
3.6 million mt/year will be LNG

that is huge, as it is larger Than many land LNG liquefaction plants

1 million tonnes LNG per year (MTPA) = 0.13 billion cubic feet natural gas per day (Bcf/d)
https://www.eia.gov/special/trilat/conversion_table/

3.6 MTPA = 0.47 BCFPD

That would compare to the very small LNG facilities in North America.  Less than a quarter of the Facility being built in Freeport, Texas.

https://www.ferc.gov/industries/gas/indus-act/lng/lng-approved.pdf
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,746
1 million tonnes LNG per year (MTPA) = 0.13 billion cubic feet natural gas per day (Bcf/d)
https://www.eia.gov/special/trilat/conversion_table/

3.6 MTPA = 0.47 BCFPD

That would compare to the very small LNG facilities in North America.  Less than a quarter of the Facility being built in Freeport, Texas.

https://www.ferc.gov/industries/gas/indus-act/lng/lng-approved.pdf
most of the world's LNG liquefaction trains to date are in the neighborhood of 2 mmt/yr.

Assuming this is a single train on Prelude, yes it is very big.
No punishment, in my opinion, is too great, for the man who can build his greatness upon his country's ruin~  George Washington

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
most of the world's LNG liquefaction trains to date are in the neighborhood of 2 mmt/yr.

Assuming this is a single train on Prelude, yes it is very big.

Why do you assume it is a single train?

http://www.upstreamonline.com/upstreamtechnology/1212720/flng-reaches-first-major-mileposts

There are three compressor trains.

http://www.offshore-technology.com/projects/shell-project/
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,746
Why do you assume it is a single train?

http://www.upstreamonline.com/upstreamtechnology/1212720/flng-reaches-first-major-mileposts

There are three compressor trains.

http://www.offshore-technology.com/projects/shell-project/
just reasoned an easier fit on a small space compared to land.

Am talking about liquefaction trains, not compressor trains.
No punishment, in my opinion, is too great, for the man who can build his greatness upon his country's ruin~  George Washington