Study blows 'greenhouse theory out of the water'

[rangerrebew]

Study blows 'greenhouse theory out of the water'
'All observed climatic changes have natural causes completely outside of human control'
Published: 8 hours ago


BOZEMAN, Mont. – A new scientific paper contends the entire foundation of the man-made global-warming theory – the assumption that greenhouse gases warm the atmosphere by trapping heat – is wrong.

If confirmed, the study’s findings would crush the entire “climate change” movement to restrict CO2 emissions, the authors assert

Some experts contacted by WND criticized the paper, while others advised caution.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/07/study-blows-greenhouse-theory-out-of-the-water/#IE2KP7jtcgBFLR8J.99

[Smokin Joe]

Interesting, and will bear watching. I am not so sure the theory accounts for warming, but it is nice to see someone come up with an alternative folks can point to. Solar cycles are my first bet, but people have trouble relaitng to processes which take tens of years, much less tens of thousands.

[Wingnut]

If it comes from the World Nut Daily I like to see another source when I do a search.   DNF.

[Cripplecreek]

If it comes from the World Nut Daily I like to see another source when I do a search.   DNF.

Yeah its hard to see through the usual WND stupid. To declare that there is no greenhouse effect is simply scientific malpractice. The greenhouse effect is proven by the fact that the temperatures don't drop by hundreds of degrees after sunset.

The real debate is over how much heat our atmosphere traps and what proportion of those atmospheric gasses are manmade.

[Smokin Joe]

Yeah its hard to see through the usual WND stupid. To declare that there is no greenhouse effect is simply scientific malpractice. The greenhouse effect is proven by the fact that the temperatures don't drop by hundreds of degrees after sunset.

The real debate is over how much heat our atmosphere traps and what proportion of those atmospheric gasses are manmade.

I have my own pet idea on the self-limiting nature of the planet that works in conjunction with solar activity to regulate temperature, in that when sea levels lower during an ice advance, the pressure drop causes degassing of methane hydrates and the methane release is what causes the climate reversal. I could be wrong, though, at this stage it's really just a wild eyed hypothesis. I'd like the idea to get some serious scrutiny before we go harvesting methane hydrates, though.

[Cripplecreek]

I have my own pet idea on the self-limiting nature of the planet that works in conjunction with solar activity to regulate temperature, in that when sea levels lower during an ice advance, the pressure drop causes degassing of methane hydrates and the methane release is what causes the climate reversal. I could be wrong, though, at this stage it's really just a wild eyed hypothesis. I'd like the idea to get some serious scrutiny before we go harvesting methane hydrates, though.

I agree with being careful

[Suppressed]

I have my own pet idea on the self-limiting nature of the planet that works in conjunction with solar activity to regulate temperature, in that when sea levels lower during an ice advance, the pressure drop causes degassing of methane hydrates and the methane release is what causes the climate reversal. I could be wrong, though, at this stage it's really just a wild eyed hypothesis. I'd like the idea to get some serious scrutiny before we go harvesting methane hydrates, though.

Why would the ice bubbles in the cores not show that methane?

[Wingnut]

Why would the ice bubbles in the cores not show that methane?

Dinosaurs, much like my ex wife, didn't pass gas?

[Smokin Joe]

Why would the ice bubbles in the cores not show that methane?

Did anyone look for methane?