Author Topic: Our Opinion: 'Sanctuary' semantics shouldn't hold up good legislation  (Read 196 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Our Opinion: 'Sanctuary' semantics shouldn't hold up good legislation

Posted Saturday, June 10, 2017 12:36 pm

Legislation on Beacon Hill effectively making Massachusetts a "sanctuary state" would protect local and state law enforcement officers from being dragged into federal immigration issues where they risk being compromised. However, the word "sanctuary" is a loaded one that is a misnomer in this case, a misnomer that should not but may contribute to sinking this worthy effort.

The concept of sanctuary cities or states goes back thousands of years and through all manner of religions that established areas, often churches, where those who fear persecution were protected. It is not clear how the term came to be associated with immigration law but it could be interpreted by some as an effort to enable illegal immigrants, including those accused of crimes, to escape justice. This is not the case.

http://www.berkshireeagle.com/stories/our-opinion-sanctuary-semanticsshouldnt-hold-upgood-legislation,510120
« Last Edit: June 12, 2017, 03:40:15 pm by rangerrebew »